ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Digital Library logoTake a look at the new version of this page: [ beta version ]. Tell us what you think.
Solving summarizability problems in fact-dimension relationships for multidimensional models
Full text PdfPdf (302 KB)
Source
Data Warehousing and OLAP archive
Proceeding of the ACM 11th international workshop on Data warehousing and OLAP table of contents
Napa Valley, California, USA
SESSION: Multidimensional design and ETL table of contents
Pages: 57-64  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-1-60558-250-4
Authors
Jose-Norberto Mazón  University of Alicante, Alicante, Spain
Jens Lechtenbörger  University of Münster, Münster, Germany
Juan Trujillo  University of Alicante, Alicante, Spain
Sponsors
SIGWEB: ACM Special Interest Group on Hypertext, Hypermedia, and Web
SIGIR: ACM Special Interest Group on Information Retrieval
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 17,   Downloads (12 Months): 148,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1458432.1458443
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Multidimensional analysis allows decision makers to efficiently and effectively use data analysis tools, which mainly depend on multidimensional (MD) structures of a data warehouse such as facts and dimension hierarchies to explore the information and aggregate it at different levels of detail in an accurate way. A conceptual model of such MD structures serves as abstract basis of the subsequent implementation according to one specific technology. However, there is a semantic gap between a conceptual model and its implementation which complicates an adequate treatment of summarizability issues, which in turn may lead to erroneous results of data analysis tools and cause the failure of the whole data warehouse project. To bridge this gap for relationships between facts and dimension, we present an approach at the conceptual level for (i) identifying problematic situations in fact-dimension relationships, (ii) defining these relationships in a conceptual MD model, and (iii) applying a normalization process to transform this conceptual MD model into a summarizability-compliant model that avoids erroneous analysis of data. Furthermore, we also describe our Eclipsebased implementation of this normalization process.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
Samira Si-Said Cherfi and Nicolas Prat. Multidimensional schemas quality: Assessing and balancing analyzability and simplicity. In ER (Workshops), pages 140--151, 2003.
 
3
John Horner and Il-Yeol Song. A taxonomy of inaccurate summaries and their management in OLAP systems. In ER, pages 433--448, 2005.
4
 
5
R. Kimball and M. Ross. The Data Warehouse Toolkit. Wiley & Sons, 2002.
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
Svetlana Mansmann, Thomas Neumuth, and Marc H. Scholl. Multidimensional data modeling for business process analysis. In ER, pages 23--38, 2007.
 
12
Svetlana Mansmann and Marc H. Scholl. Extending visual OLAP for handling irregular dimensional hierarchies. In DaWaK, pages 95--105, 2006.
 
13
 
14
 
15
OMG. Unified Modeling Language Specification 2.0. http://www.omg.org/cgi-bin/doc?formal/05-07-04.
 
16
OMG. MDA Guide 1.0.1. http://www.omg.org/cgi-bin/doc?omg/03-06-01
 
17
OMG. MOF 2.0 Query/View/Transformation. http://www.omg.org/cgi-bin/doc?ptc/2005-11-0.
 
18
 
19
 
20
21
 
22
Il-Yeol Song, William Rowen, Carl Medsker, and Edward F. Ewen. An analysis of many-to-many relationships between fact and dimension tables in dimensional modeling. In DMDW, page 6, 2001.
 
23

Collaborative Colleagues:
Jose-Norberto Mazón: colleagues
Jens Lechtenbörger: colleagues
Juan Trujillo: colleagues