| Solving summarizability problems in fact-dimension relationships for multidimensional models |
| Full text |
Pdf
(302 KB)
|
Source
|
Data Warehousing and OLAP
archive
Proceeding of the ACM 11th international workshop on Data warehousing and OLAP
table of contents
Napa Valley, California, USA
SESSION: Multidimensional design and ETL
table of contents
Pages: 57-64
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-1-60558-250-4
|
|
Authors
|
|
| Sponsors |
|
| Publisher |
|
| Bibliometrics |
Downloads (6 Weeks): 17, Downloads (12 Months): 148, Citation Count: 0
|
|
|
ABSTRACT
Multidimensional analysis allows decision makers to efficiently and effectively use data analysis tools, which mainly depend on multidimensional (MD) structures of a data warehouse such as facts and dimension hierarchies to explore the information and aggregate it at different levels of detail in an accurate way. A conceptual model of such MD structures serves as abstract basis of the subsequent implementation according to one specific technology. However, there is a semantic gap between a conceptual model and its implementation which complicates an adequate treatment of summarizability issues, which in turn may lead to erroneous results of data analysis tools and cause the failure of the whole data warehouse project. To bridge this gap for relationships between facts and dimension, we present an approach at the conceptual level for (i) identifying problematic situations in fact-dimension relationships, (ii) defining these relationships in a conceptual MD model, and (iii) applying a normalization process to transform this conceptual MD model into a summarizability-compliant model that avoids erroneous analysis of data. Furthermore, we also describe our Eclipsebased implementation of this normalization process.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
|
| |
2
|
Samira Si-Said Cherfi and Nicolas Prat. Multidimensional schemas quality: Assessing and balancing analyzability and simplicity. In ER (Workshops), pages 140--151, 2003.
|
| |
3
|
John Horner and Il-Yeol Song. A taxonomy of inaccurate summaries and their management in OLAP systems. In ER, pages 433--448, 2005.
|
 |
4
|
|
| |
5
|
R. Kimball and M. Ross. The Data Warehouse Toolkit. Wiley & Sons, 2002.
|
| |
6
|
|
| |
7
|
|
| |
8
|
|
| |
9
|
|
| |
10
|
|
| |
11
|
Svetlana Mansmann, Thomas Neumuth, and Marc H. Scholl. Multidimensional data modeling for business process analysis. In ER, pages 23--38, 2007.
|
| |
12
|
Svetlana Mansmann and Marc H. Scholl. Extending visual OLAP for handling irregular dimensional hierarchies. In DaWaK, pages 95--105, 2006.
|
| |
13
|
|
| |
14
|
|
| |
15
|
OMG. Unified Modeling Language Specification 2.0. http://www.omg.org/cgi-bin/doc?formal/05-07-04.
|
| |
16
|
OMG. MDA Guide 1.0.1. http://www.omg.org/cgi-bin/doc?omg/03-06-01
|
| |
17
|
OMG. MOF 2.0 Query/View/Transformation. http://www.omg.org/cgi-bin/doc?ptc/2005-11-0.
|
| |
18
|
|
| |
19
|
|
| |
20
|
|
 |
21
|
Stefano Rizzi , Alberto Abelló , Jens Lechtenbörger , Juan Trujillo, Research in data warehouse modeling and design: dead or alive?, Proceedings of the 9th ACM international workshop on Data warehousing and OLAP, November 10-10, 2006, Arlington, Virginia, USA
[doi> 10.1145/1183512.1183515]
|
| |
22
|
Il-Yeol Song, William Rowen, Carl Medsker, and Edward F. Ewen. An analysis of many-to-many relationships between fact and dimension tables in dimensional modeling. In DMDW, page 6, 2001.
|
| |
23
|
|
|