ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
To swing or not to swing: learning when (not) to advertise
Full text PdfPdf (230 KB)
Source
Conference on Information and Knowledge Management archive
Proceeding of the 17th ACM conference on Information and knowledge management table of contents
Napa Valley, California, USA
SESSION: IR: advertising & filtering table of contents
Pages 1003-1012  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-1-59593-991-3
Authors
Andrei Broder  Yahoo! Research, Santa Clara, CA, USA
Massimiliano Ciaramita  Yahoo! Research Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
Marcus Fontoura  PUC-Rio, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Evgeniy Gabrilovich  Yahoo! Research, Santa Clara, CA, USA
Vanja Josifovski  Yahoo! Research, Santa Clara, CA, USA
Donald Metzler  Yahoo! Research, Santa Clara, CA, USA
Vanessa Murdock  Yahoo! Research Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
Vassilis Plachouras  Yahoo! Research Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGWEB: ACM Special Interest Group on Hypertext, Hypermedia, and Web
SIGIR: ACM Special Interest Group on Information Retrieval
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 23,   Downloads (12 Months): 201,   Citation Count: 4
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1458082.1458216
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Web textual advertising can be interpreted as a search problem over the corpus of ads available for display in a particular context. In contrast to conventional information retrieval systems, which always return results if the corpus contains any documents lexically related to the query, in Web advertising it is acceptable, and occasionally even desirable, not to show any results. When no ads are relevant to the user's interests, then showing irrelevant ads should be avoided since they annoy the user and produce no economic benefit. In this paper we pose a decision problem "whether to swing", that is, whether or not to show any of the ads for the incoming request. We propose two methods for addressing this problem, a simple thresholding approach and a machine learning approach, which collectively analyzes the set of candidate ads augmented with external knowledge. Our experimental evaluation, based on over 28,000 editorial judgments, shows that we are able to predict, with high accuracy, when to "swing" for both content match and sponsored search advertising.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Y. Al-Onaizan, J. Curin, M. Jahr, K. Knight, J. Lafferty, D. Melamed, F.-J. Och, D. Purdy, N. A. Smith, and D. Yarowsky. Statistical machine translation, final report, JHU workshop, 1999.
2
3
 
4
 
5
6
 
7
J. Carrasco, D. Fain, K. Lang, and L. Zhukov. Clustering of bipartite advertiser-keyword graph. In ICDM Workshop on Clustering Large Datasets. IEEE Comp. Soc. Press, 2003.
 
8
9
 
10
M. Ciaramita, V. Murdock, and V. Plachouras. Semantic associations for contextual advertising. International Journal of Electronic Commerce Research - Special Issue on Online Advertising and Sponsored Search, 2008. To Appear.
11
 
12
 
13
K. Gallagher, D. Foster, and J. Parsons. The medium is not the message: Advertising effectiveness and content evaluation in print and on the web. Journal Of Advertising Research, 41(4):57--70, 2001.
 
14
B. He and I. Ounis. Inferring query performance using pre-retrieval predictors. In 11th Symposium on String Processing and Information Retrieval, 2004.
15
 
16
17
18
19
20
 
21
D. Metzler, S. Dumais, and C. Meek. Similarity measures for short segments of text. In ECIR, pages 16--27, 2007.
22
23
24
25
 
26
C. Wang, P. Zhang, R. Choi, and M. D. Eredita. Understanding consumers attitude toward advertising. In Proc. of the 8th Americas Conf. on Information System, pages 1143--1148, 2002.
27
 
28
29


Collaborative Colleagues:
Andrei Broder: colleagues
Massimiliano Ciaramita: colleagues
Marcus Fontoura: colleagues
Evgeniy Gabrilovich: colleagues
Vanja Josifovski: colleagues
Donald Metzler: colleagues
Vanessa Murdock: colleagues
Vassilis Plachouras: colleagues