ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Matching task profiles and user needs in personalized web search
Full text PdfPdf (296 KB)
Source
Conference on Information and Knowledge Management archive
Proceeding of the 17th ACM conference on Information and knowledge management table of contents
Napa Valley, California, USA
SESSION: IR: web search 2 table of contents
Pages 689-698  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-1-59593-991-3
Authors
Julia Luxenburger  Max-Planck Institut für Informatik, Saarbrücken, Germany
Shady Elbassuoni  Max-Planck Institut für Informatik, Saarbrücken, Germany
Gerhard Weikum  Max-Planck Institut für Informatik, Saarbrücken, Germany
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGWEB: ACM Special Interest Group on Hypertext, Hypermedia, and Web
SIGIR: ACM Special Interest Group on Information Retrieval
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 19,   Downloads (12 Months): 247,   Citation Count: 2
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1458082.1458175
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Personalization has been deemed one of the major challenges in information retrieval with a significant potential for providing better search experience to individual users. Especially, the need for enhanced user models better capturing elements such as users' goals, tasks, and contexts has been identified. In this paper, we introduce a statistical language model for user tasks representing different granularity levels of a user profile, ranging from very specific search goals to broad topics. We propose a personalization framework that selectively matches the actual user information need with relevant past user tasks, and allows to dynamically switch the course of personalization from re-finding very precise information to biasing results to general user interests. In the extreme, our model is able to detect when the user's search and browse history is not appropriate for aiding the user in satisfying her current information quest. Instead of blindly applying personalization to all user queries, our approach refrains from undue actions in these cases, accounting for the user's desire of discovering new topics, and changing interests over time. The effectiveness of our method is demonstrated by an empirical user study.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
G. Amati, C. Carpineto, and G. Romano. Query difficulty, robustness, and selective application of query expansion. In ECIR, 2004.
2
 
3
4
5
 
6
B. Carterette and R. Jones. Evaluating search engines by modeling the relationship between relevance and clicks. In NIPS, 2007.
7
8
9
10
11
 
12
S. Elbassuoni, J. Luxenburger, and G. Weikum. Adaptive personalization of web search. In 1st SIGIR Workshop on Web Information Seeking and Interaction, 2007.
 
13
J. Grivolla, P. Jourlin, and R. de Mori. Automatic classification of queries by expected retrieval performance. In SIGIR, 2005.
 
14
15
 
16
B. He and I. Ounis. Inferring query performance using pre-retrieval predictors. In SPIRE, 2004.
17
18
 
19
H. Kim and P. Chan. Personalized ranking of search results with learned user interest hierarchies from bookmarks. In WebKDD, 2005.
 
20
21
 
22
23
24
 
25
F. Scholer, M. Shokouhi, B. Billerbeck, and A. Turpin. Using clicks as implicit judgements: Expectations versus observations. In ECIR, 2008.
26
27
28
29
30
31
32


Collaborative Colleagues:
Julia Luxenburger: colleagues
Shady Elbassuoni: colleagues
Gerhard Weikum: colleagues