ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Some rewrite optimizations of DB2 XQuery navigation
Full text PdfPdf (3.57 MB)
Source
Conference on Information and Knowledge Management archive
Proceeding of the 17th ACM conference on Information and knowledge management table of contents
Napa Valley, California, USA
SESSION: DB/industry: XML data integration and XML query optimization table of contents
Pages 531-540  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-1-59593-991-3
Authors
Guangjun Xie  IBM Canada, Toronto, ON, Canada
Qi Cheng  IBM Canada, Toronto, ON, Canada
Jarek Gryz  York University, Toronto, ON, Canada
Calisto Zuzarte  IBM Canada, Toronto, ON, Canada
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGWEB: ACM Special Interest Group on Hypertext, Hypermedia, and Web
SIGIR: ACM Special Interest Group on Information Retrieval
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 11,   Downloads (12 Months): 99,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1458082.1458153
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

IBM® DB2® 9 is a truly hybrid commercial database system that combines XML and relational data. It provides native support for XML storage and indexing, and query evaluation support for XQuery. By building a hybrid system, the designers of DB2 9 were able to use the existing SQL query evaluation and optimization techniques to develop similar methods for XQuery. However, SQL and XQuery are sufficiently different that new optimization techniques can and are being developed in the new XQuery domain. This paper describes a few such techniques, all based on static rewrites of XQuery expressions.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
3
4
5
 
6
7
 
8
 
9
B. Choi, M. Fernandez, J. Simeon. The XQuery Formal Semantics: A Foundation for Implementation and Optimization. Technical Report MS-CIS-02-25, University of Pennsylvania, 2002.
10
 
11
 
12
P. Gassner, G. M. Lohman, B. Schiefer, Y. Wang. Query Optimization in the IBM DB2 Family. IEEE Data Eng. Bulletin Journal 1993, Volume 16, number 4: 4--18.
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
17
 
18
A. Kwong, M. Gertz. Schema-based Optimization of XPath Expressions. Technical report, University of California at Davis, Dept. of Computer Science, 2001
19
 
20
P. Michiels. XQuery Optimization. Proceedings of the VLDB 2003 PhD Workshop.
 
21
22
 
23
24
25
 
26
27
 
28
29
 
30
Y. Wu, J. Patel, H. V. Jagadish. Structured Join Order Selection for XML Query Optimization. ICDE 2003: 443--454.
 
31
World Wide Web Consortium (W3C). XQuery 1.0 and XPath 2.0 Data Model (XDM). W3C Recommendation 23 January 2007. http://www.w3.org/TR/xpath-datamodel/
 
32
World Wide Web Consortium (W3C). XQuery 1.0: An XML Query Language. W3C Recommendation 23 January 2007. http://www.w3.org/TR/xquery/
 
33
World Wide Web Consortium (W3C). XQuery 1.0 and XPath 2.0 Formal Semantics. World Wide Web Consortium (W3C). http://www.w3.org/TR/xquery-semantics/
 
34

Collaborative Colleagues:
Guangjun Xie: colleagues
Qi Cheng: colleagues
Jarek Gryz: colleagues
Calisto Zuzarte: colleagues