ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Non-local evidence for expert finding
Full text PdfPdf (433 KB)
Source
Conference on Information and Knowledge Management archive
Proceeding of the 17th ACM conference on Information and knowledge management table of contents
Napa Valley, California, USA
SESSION: KM: web mining table of contents
Pages 489-498  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-1-59593-991-3
Authors
Krisztian Balog  ISLA, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
Maarten de Rijke  ISLA, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGWEB: ACM Special Interest Group on Hypertext, Hypermedia, and Web
SIGIR: ACM Special Interest Group on Information Retrieval
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 57,   Downloads (12 Months): 198,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1458082.1458148
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

The task addressed in this paper, finding experts in an enterprise setting, has gained in importance and interest over the past few years. Commonly, this task is approached as an association finding exercise between people and topics. Existing techniques use either documents (as a whole) or proximity-based techniques to represent candidate experts. Proximity-based techniques have shown clear precision-enhancing benefits. We complement both document and proximity-based approaches to expert finding by importing global evidence of expertise, i.e., evidence obtained using information that is not available in the immediate proximity of a candidate expert's name occurrence or even on the same page on which the name occurs. Examples include candidate priors, query models, as well as other documents a candidate expert is associated with.

Using the CERC data set created for the TREC 2007 Enterprise track we identify examples of non-local evidence of expertise. We then propose modified expert retrieval models that are capable of incorporating both local (either document or snippet-based) evidence and non-local evidence of expertise. Results show that our refined models significantly outperform existing state-of-the-art approaches.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
P. Bailey, N. Craswell, A. P. de Vries, and I. Soboroff. Overview of the TREC 2007 Enterprise Track. In The Sixteenth Text REtrieval Conference Proc. (TREC 2007), 2008.
 
3
K. Balog. People Search in the Enterprise. PhD thesis, University of Amsterdam, 2008.
 
4
K. Balog and M. de Rijke. Associating people and documents. In Proc. 30th European Conference on Information Retrieval, pages 296--308, 2008.
5
6
7
 
8
K. Balog, L. Azzopardi, and M. de Rijke. A language modeling framework for expertise search. In Information Processing & Management, To Appear.
 
9
Y. Cao, J. Liu, S. Bao, and H. Li. Research on Expert Search at Enterprise Track of TREC 2005. In The Fourteenth Text REtrieval Conference Proceedings (TREC 2005), 2006.
 
10
N. Craswell, D. Hawking, A. M. Vercoustre, and P. Wilkins. P@noptic expert: Searching for experts not just for documents. In Ausweb, 2001.
 
11
N. Craswell, A. P. de Vries, and I. Soboroff. Overview of the TREC-2005 Enterprise Track. In The Fourteenth Text REtrieval Conference Proceedings (TREC 2005), 2006.
 
12
H. Fang and C. Zhai. Probabilistic models for expert finding. In Proc. 29th European Conference on Information Retrieval, pages 418--430, 2007.
13
 
14
C. Macdonald and I. Ounis. A belief network model for expert search. In Proceedings of 1st conference on Theory of Information Retrieval (ICTIR), 2007.
 
15
16
 
17
C. Macdonald, D. Hannah, and I. Ounis. High quality expertise evidence for expert search. In Proc. 30th European Conference on Information Retrieval, 2008.
 
18
D. J. C. Mackay and L. Peto. A hierarchical Dirichlet language model. Nat. Language Engin., 1(3):1--19, 1994.
 
19
20
 
21
J. Rocchio. Relevance feedback in information retrieval. In The SMART Retrieval System: Experiments in Automatic Document Processing. Prentice Hall, 1971.
 
22
H. Rode, P. Serdyukov, D. Hiemstra, and H. Zaragoza. Entity ranking on graphs: Studies on expert finding. Technical Report TR-CTIT-07-81, University of Twente, 2007.
 
23
P. Serdyukov and D. Hiemstra. Modeling documents as mixtures of persons for expert finding'. In Proc. 30th European Conference on Information Retrieval, pages 309--320, 2008.
 
24
P. Serdyukov, H. Rode, and D. Hiemstra. Modeling relevance propagation for the expert search task. In The Sixteenth Text REtrieval Conference Proceedings (TREC 2007), 2008.
25
 
26
I. Soboroff, A. de Vries, and N. Crawell. Overview of the TREC 2006 Enterprise Track. In The Fifteenth Text REtrieval Conference Proceedings (TREC 2006), 2007.
27
 
28
J. Zhu, D. Song, S. Ruger, M. Eisenstadt, and E. Motta. The Open University at TREC 2006 Enterprise Track Expert Search Task. In The Fourteenth Text REtrieval Conference Proceedings (TREC 2006), 2007.
 
29
J. Zhu, D. Song, and S. Rüger. The Open University at TREC 2007 Enterprise Track. In The Fifteenth Text REtrieval Conference Proceedings (TREC 2007), 2008.

Collaborative Colleagues:
Krisztian Balog: colleagues
Maarten de Rijke: colleagues