ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Minimum-effort driven dynamic faceted search in structured databases
Full text PdfPdf (371 KB)
Source
Conference on Information and Knowledge Management archive
Proceeding of the 17th ACM conference on Information and knowledge management table of contents
Napa Valley, California, USA
SESSION: DB: faceted search, web query results presentation table of contents
Pages 13-22  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-1-59593-991-3
Authors
Senjuti Basu Roy  University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX, USA
Haidong Wang  University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX, USA
Gautam Das  University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX, USA
Ullas Nambiar  IBM India Research Lab, New Delhi, India
Mukesh Mohania  IBM India Research Lab, New Delhi, India
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGWEB: ACM Special Interest Group on Hypertext, Hypermedia, and Web
SIGIR: ACM Special Interest Group on Information Retrieval
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 24,   Downloads (12 Months): 224,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1458082.1458088
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

In this paper, we propose minimum-effort driven navigational techniques for enterprise database systems based on the faceted search paradigm. Our proposed techniques dynamically suggest facets for drilling down into the database such that the cost of navigation is minimized. At every step, the system asks the user a question or a set of questions on different facets and depending on the user response, dynamically fetches the next most promising set of facets, and the process repeats. Facets are selected based on their ability to rapidly drill down to the most promising tuples, as well as on the ability of the user to provide desired values for them. Our facet selection algorithms also work in conjunction with any ranked retrieval model where a ranking function imposes a bias over the user preferences for the selected tuples. Our methods are principled as well as efficient, and our experimental study validates their effectiveness on several application scenarios.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
2
3
 
4
W. Dakka, P. G. Ipeirotis and K. R. Wood. Faceted Browsing over Large Databases of Text-Annotated Objects. ICDE 2007.
5
 
6
E. Stoica, M. Hearst and M. Richardson. Automating Creation of Hierarchical Faceted Metadata Structures. In the proceedings of NAACL-HLT 2007.
7
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
B. Aditya, G. Bhalotia, S. Chakrabarti, A. Hulgeri, C. Nakhe, P. S. Sudarshan. BANKS: Browsing and Keyword Searching in Relational Databases. ICDE 2003.
 
14
C. L. Lucchesi and S. L. Osborn. Candidate Keys for Relations. J. Comput. Syst. Sci., 17(2): 1978.
 
15
 
16
 
17
J. Shlens. A Tutorial on Principal Component Analysis. Institute for Nonlinear Science, UCSD, 2005.
18
 
19
 
20
S. Agrawal, S. Chaudhuri, G. Das, A. Gionis. Automated Ranking of Database Query Results. CIDR 2003.
 
21
 
22
E. N. Efthimiadis. Query Expansion. Annual Review of Information Systems and Technology 1996.
23
24
25

Collaborative Colleagues:
Senjuti Basu Roy: colleagues
Haidong Wang: colleagues
Gautam Das: colleagues
Ullas Nambiar: colleagues
Mukesh Mohania: colleagues