Peer review assessment standard for object oriented analysis and design

ABSTRACT

In this paper, the author discusses some peer review pitfalls, as well as, the key elements in an effective peer review session. The paper also provides the assessment standard checklist for object-oriented (OO) analysis and design professionals during a peer review inspection.

REFERENCES

• 1: Coleman, Deborah G., "Dimensions of Interactive Software Requirements: Synergistic Opportunity," in IEEE, August 2005, pp.397--405.
• 2: Stumpf Robert V. and Teague, Lavette C., "Object-Oriented Systems Analysis And Design With UML," Pearson Prentice Hall publisher, 2005.
• 3: Karl Wiegers, Improving quality with software inspections, Software Development, v.3 n.4, p.55-64, April 1995
• 4: Karl Wiegers, The seven deadly sins of software reviews, Software Development, v.6 n.3, p.44-47, March 1998
• 5: Wiegers, Karl E., "Seven Truths About Peer Reviews," in Software Development magazine, July 2002.
• 6: Wiegers, Karl E., " When Two Eyes Aren't Engough," in Software Development magazine, October 2001.

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  D. Software
  D.2 SOFTWARE ENGINEERING
      D.2.2 Design Tools and Techniques
          Subjects: Object-oriented design methods

Additional Classification:
  D. Software
  D.2 SOFTWARE ENGINEERING
      D.2.3 Coding Tools and Techniques
          Subjects: Object-oriented programming

General Terms:
Design, Experimentation, Measurement, Performance, Standardization