ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Demarcating curves for shape illustration
Full text MovMov (26:28),  PdfPdf (9.55 MB)
Source International Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques archive
ACM SIGGRAPH Asia 2008 papers table of contents
Singapore
SESSION: Non-photorealistic rendering table of contents
Article No. 157  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISSN:0730-0301
Also published in ...
Authors
Michael Kolomenkin  Technion
Ilan Shimshoni  University of Haifa
Ayellet Tal  Technion
Sponsor
SIGGRAPH: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 24,   Downloads (12 Months): 232,   Citation Count: 4
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1457515.1409110
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Curves on objects can convey the inherent features of the shape. This paper defines a new class of view-independent curves, denoted demarcating curves. In a nutshell, demarcating curves are the loci of the "strongest" inflections on the surface. Due to their appealing capabilities to extract and emphasize 3D textures, they are applied to artifact illustration in archaeology, where they can serve as a worthy alternative to the expensive, time-consuming, and biased manual depiction currently used.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Bartesaghi, A., and Sapiro, G. 2001. A system for the generation of curves on 3D brain images. Human brain mapping 14, 1, 1--15.
2
3
4
5
6
 
7
Deussen, O., Hiller, S., van Overveld, C., and Strothotte, T. 2000. Floating points: A method for computing stipple drawings. Computer Graphics Forum 19, 3, 40--51.
 
8
Do Carmo, M. P. 1976. Differential geometry of curves and surfaces. Prentice-Hall.
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
13
14
 
15
 
16
Koenderink, J. J. 1984. What does the occluding contour tell us about solid shape? Perception 13, 3, 321--330.
 
17
 
18
Koller, D., Trimble, J., Najbjerg, T., Gelfand, N., and Levoy, M. 2006. Fragments of the city: Stanford's digital forma urbis romae project. J. of Roman Arch. 61, 237--252.
19
 
20
Maaten, L. J. P., Boon, P. J., Paijmans, J. J., Lange, A. G., and Postma, E. O. 2006. Computer vision and machine learning for archaeology. In Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology, 112--130.
 
21
Mehlum, E., and Tarrou, C. 2006. Invariant smoothness measures for surfaces. Advances in Comp. Math. 8, 1-2, 49--63.
22
 
23
Page, D., Koschan, A., Abidi, M., and Overhiolt, J. 2006. Ridge-valley path planning for 3D terrains. In IEEE Int. Conf. on Robotics and Automation, 119--124.
 
24
Pauly, M., Keiser, R., and Gross. 2003. Multi-scale feature extraction on point-sampled surfaces. Computer Graphics Forum 22, 3, 281--290.
 
25
Pearson, D. E., and Robinson, J. A. 1985. Visual communication at very low data rates. Proceedings of IEEE 73, 795--812.
 
26
 
27
Rushmeier, H. 2005. Eternal Egypt: experiences and research directions. In Modeling and Visualization of Cultural Heritage, 22--27.
28
 
29
30
 
31
Stern, E. 1995. Excavations at Dor. Jerusalem: Institute of Archaeology of the Hebrew University.
 
32
 
33
 
34
35


Collaborative Colleagues:
Michael Kolomenkin: colleagues
Ilan Shimshoni: colleagues
Ayellet Tal: colleagues