|
ABSTRACT
We propose a simple but effective upsampling method for automatically enhancing the image/video resolution, while preserving the essential structural information. The main advantage of our method lies in a feedback-control framework which faithfully recovers the high-resolution image information from the input data, without imposing additional local structure constraints learned from other examples. This makes our method independent of the quality and number of the selected examples, which are issues typical of learning-based algorithms, while producing high-quality results without observable unsightly artifacts. Another advantage is that our method naturally extends to video upsampling, where the temporal coherence is maintained automatically. Finally, our method runs very fast. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our algorithm by experimenting with different image/video data.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
 |
1
|
|
| |
2
|
Baker, S., and Kanade, T. 2000. Limits on super-resolution and how to break them. In CVPR, IEEE Computer Society, 2372--2379.
|
| |
3
|
|
| |
4
|
Bhat, P., Zitnick, C. L., Snavely, N., Agarwala, A., Agrawala, M., Curless, B., Cohen, M., and Kang, S. B. 2007. Using photographs to enhance videos of a static scene. In Eurographics Symposium on Rendering, Eurographics, 327--338.
|
| |
5
|
Bishop, C. M., Blake, A., and Marthi, B. 2003. Super-resolutioin enhancement of video. In In 9th Conf. on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics.
|
| |
6
|
Chan, T. F., Osher, S., and Shen, J. 2001. The digital tv filter and nonlinear denoising. IEEE Trans. on Image Processing 10, 2, 231--241.
|
 |
7
|
|
 |
8
|
|
| |
9
|
|
| |
10
|
Frigo, M., and Johnson, S. G., 2006. FFTW Home Page. WWW page. http://www.fftw.org/.
|
 |
11
|
|
| |
12
|
Huang, J. G., and Mumford, D. 1999. Statistics of natural images and models. In CVPR, 1541--1547.
|
| |
13
|
Irani, M., and Peleg, S. 1993. Motion analysis for image enhancement: resolution, occlusion, and transparency. Journal of Visual Communication and Image Representation 4, 324--335.
|
| |
14
|
Keys, R. G. 1981. Cubic convolution interpolation for digital image processing. IEEE Trans. Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing 29, 1153--1160.
|
| |
15
|
Kong, D., Han, M., Xu, W., Tao, H., and Gong, Y. H. 2006. Video super-resolution with scene-specific priors. In BMVC.
|
 |
16
|
|
| |
17
|
Mon, D., 2006. Video enhancer. WWW page. http://www.thedeemon.com/VideoEnhancer/.
|
| |
18
|
Osher, S., Sole, A., and Vese, L. 2003. Image decomposition and restoration using total variation minimization and the H-1. Multiscale Modeling and Simulation 1, 3, 349--370.
|
| |
19
|
Patti, A., Sezan, M., and Tekalp, A. 1997. Super resolution video reconstruction with arbitrary sampling lattices and nonzero aperture time. IEEE Trans. on Image Processing 6, 1064--1076.
|
| |
20
|
QELabs, 2005. Qe super resolution. WWW page. http://www.qelabs.com/index.
|
| |
21
|
Schultz, R. R., and Stevenson, R. L. 1996. Extraction of high-resolution frames from video sequences. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 5, 996--1011.
|
 |
22
|
|
| |
23
|
Sun, J., Sun, J., Xu, Z. B., and Shum, H. Y. 2008. Image super-rosolution using gradient profile prior. In CVPR.
|
| |
24
|
Tappen, M. F., Russell, B. C., and Freeman, W. T. 2003. Exploiting the sparse derivative prior for super-resolution and image demosaicing. In Intl. Workshop on Statistical and Computational Theories of Vision.
|
| |
25
|
Tappen, M. F., Russell, B. C., and Freeman, W. T. 2004. Efficient graphical models for processing images. In CVPR, IEEE Computer Society, 673--680.
|
| |
26
|
Tipping, M. E., and Bishop, C. M. 2002. Bayesian image super resolution. In NIPS, MIT Press, 1279--1286.
|
 |
27
|
|
| |
28
|
|
|