ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Depicting procedural caustics in single images
Full text MovMov (23:04),  PdfPdf (16.13 MB)
Source International Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques archive
ACM SIGGRAPH Asia 2008 papers table of contents
Singapore
SESSION: Fun with single images table of contents
Article No. 120  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISSN:0730-0301
Also published in ...
Authors
Diego Gutierrez  Universidad de Zaragoza
Francisco J. Seron  Universidad de Zaragoza
Jorge Lopez-Moreno  Universidad de Zaragoza
Maria P. Sanchez  Universidad de Zaragoza
Jorge Fandos  Universidad de Zaragoza
Erik Reinhard  University of Bristol
Sponsor
SIGGRAPH: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 17,   Downloads (12 Months): 226,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1457515.1409073
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

We present a powerful technique to simulate and approximate caustics in images. Our algorithm is designed to produce good results without the need to painstakingly paint over pixels. The ability to edit global illumination through image processing allows interaction with images at a level which has not yet been demonstrated, and significantly augments and extends current image-based material editing approaches. We show by means of a set of psychophysical experiments that the resulting imagery is visually plausible and on par with photon mapping, albeit without the need for hand-modeling the underlying geometry.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Born, M., and Wolf, E. 1999. Principles of Optics: Electromagnetic Theory of Propagation, Interference and Diffraction of Light, 7th ed. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
 
2
David, H. A. 1988. The Method of Paired Comparisons. Charles Griffin & Company, London.
3
 
4
 
5
Kendall, M. G., and Babington-Smith, B. 1940. On the method of paired comparisons. Biometrica 31, 3/4, 324--345.
6
 
7
Kovesi, P. 1996. Invariant measures of image features from phase information. PhD thesis, The University of Western Australia.
 
8
Kovesi, P. 1997. Symmetry and asymmetry from local phase. In 10th Australian Joint Converence on Artificial Intelligence, 2--4.
 
9
Kovesi, P. 1999. Image features from phase congruency. Videre: Journal of Computer Vision Research 1, 3, 2--26.
 
10
Kruger, J., Burger, K., and Westermann, R. 2006. Interactive screen-space accurate photon tracing. In Proceedings of the Eurographics Symposium on Rendering, 319--329.
 
11
Langer, M., and Bülthoff, H. H. 2000. Depth discrimination from shading under diffuse lighting. Perception 29, 6, 649--660.
12
 
13
 
14
Morrone, M. C., and Burr, D. C. 1988. Feature detection in human vision: A phase-dependent energy model. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 235, 1280, 221--245.
15
 
16
Openheim, A. V., and Lim, J. S. 1981. The importance of phase in signals. Proceedings of the IEEE 69, 5, 529--541.
 
17
Te Pas, S. F., and Pont, S. C. 2005. Estimations of light source direction depend critically on material brdfs. Perception. Supplement ECVP05 34, 212.
 
18
Pearson, E. S., and Hartley, H. O. 1966. Biometrika Tables for Statisticians, 3rd ed., vol. 1. Cambridge University Press.
 
19
Piotrowski, L. N., and Campbell, F. W. 1982. A demonstration of the visual importance and flexibility of spatial-frequency amplitude and phase. Perception 11, 3, 337--346.
 
20
 
21
Setyawan, I., and Lagendijk, R. L. 2004. Human perception of geometric distortions in images. In Proceedings of SPIE, Security, Steganography and Watermarking of Multimedia Contents VI, 256--267.
 
22
 
23
Szirmay-Kalos, L., Aszódi, B., Lazányi, I., and Premecz, M. 2005. Approximate ray-tracing on the GPU with distance impostors. Computer Graphics Forum 24, 3, 695--704.
 
24
 
25
Tyler, C. W., Ed. 1996. Human Symmetry Perception and its Computational Analysis. VSP International Science Publishers, Utrecht.
 
26
Wagemans, J. 1995. Detection of visual symmetries. Spatial Vision 9, 1, 9--32.
 
27
 
28
Wichmann, F. A., Braun, D. I., and Gegenfurtner, K. R. 2006. Phase noise and the classication of natural images. Vision Research 46, 8/9, 1520--1529.
 
29
Wu, J., and Yang, C.-X. 2005. Detecting image symmetry based on phase information. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Machine Learning and Cybernetics, 5150--5153.
 
30
Wyman, C., and Dachsbacher, C. 2008. Improving image-space caustics via variable-sized splatting. Journal of Graphics Tools 13, 1, 1--17.
31
32
 
33
Wyman, C. 2007. Interactive refractions and caustics using image-space techniques. In ShaderX5: Advanced Rendering Techniques, W. Engel, Ed. Charles River Media, 359--371.
34
 
35
 
36
 
37
Zabrodsky, H. 1993. Computational Aspects of Pattern Characterization. Continuous Symmetry. PhD thesis, Hebrew University in Jerusalem.
 
38

Collaborative Colleagues:
Diego Gutierrez: colleagues
Francisco J. Seron: colleagues
Jorge Lopez-Moreno: colleagues
Maria P. Sanchez: colleagues
Jorge Fandos: colleagues
Erik Reinhard: colleagues