ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Design and trial evaluation of the user interface for MusicReader
Full text PdfPdf (873 KB)
Source
MindTrek archive
Proceedings of the 12th international conference on Entertainment and media in the ubiquitous era table of contents
Tampere, Finland
SESSION: Ubimedia track table of contents
Pages 95-99  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-1-60558-197-2
Authors
Marco Leoné  Leoné MusicReader B.V., JC Borne, The Netherlands
Betsy van Dijk  University of Twente, AE Enschede, The Netherlands
Bert-Jan van Beijnum  University of Twente, AE Enschede, The Netherlands
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGMULTIMEDIA: ACM Special Interest Group on Multimedia
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 2,   Downloads (12 Months): 46,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1457199.1457220
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

This paper describes the design and trial results of MusicReader, a networked application realizing sheet music related services for supporting rehearsals and performances of orchestras and ensembles. To this end, MusicReader presents sheet music on computer screens and supports annotations, sheet music retrieval, and sheet music management and library functionalities. MusicReader thus replaces traditional paper based sheet music, and provides additional functionality made possible as a result of adopting ICT. Our focus here is on the Human Computer Interaction aspects of MusicReader. The design of the interface supports various input devices such as digitized pen and touch screen, and uses a mixture of interaction modes and styles. The design presented in this paper, is based on a pre-trial evaluation among the envisioned target user group, and has been implemented. The interface design has been validated in rehearsal and performance trials. The results demonstrate the viability of the system and interface and give directions for future improvements.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Graefe C, Wahila D, Maguire J & Dasna O. Designing the muse:CHI - Proceedings Volume 1996: pp. 436--441.
 
2
Bellini P, Fioravanti F & Nesi P. Public final report moods version 1.0 (25/2/99). Universita' di Firenze. 1999b.
 
3
Offermans A. Electronic music book. Delft University of Technology. 2005.
 
4
McPherson J. Page turning - score automation for musicians. University of Canterbury. 1999.
 
5
Freehand Musicpad Pro. http://www.freehandsystems.com.
 
6
Estand website. http://www.estandmusic.com/.
 
7
 
8
Marinilli M. Mastering interaction modes (2003). http://developer.com/design/article.php/10925_1578681_2
 
9
Interaction-Design.org (2007). Interaction Styles. Retrieved 30 Aug 2008 from: http://www.interaction-design.org/encyclopedia/interaction_styles.html
 
10
Screen size measures. Visited October 2007. http://users.tkk.fi/~tgustafs/screensize.html.
11
 
12
 
13
MSDN - designing for touch input. http://msdn2.microsoft.om/en-us/library/ms695008.aspx.
 
14
15

Collaborative Colleagues:
Marco Leoné: colleagues
Betsy van Dijk: colleagues
Bert-Jan van Beijnum: colleagues