ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
The effect of violating visual conventions of a website on user performance and disorientation: how bad can it be?
Full text PdfPdf (437 KB)
Source
ACM Special Interest Group for Design of Communication archive
Proceedings of the 26th annual ACM international conference on Design of communication table of contents
Lisbon, Portugal
SESSION: Usability table of contents
Pages 47-54  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-1-60558-083-8
Authors
Luis Santa-Maria  University of Reading, Earley Gate, Whiteknights, Reading, United Kingdom
Mary C. Dyson  University of Reading, Earley Gate, Whiteknights, Reading, United Kingdom
Sponsor
SIGDOC: ACM Special Interest Group for Design of Communications
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 3,   Downloads (12 Months): 85,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1456536.1456547
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

This experiment investigates what happens to user performance and disorientation when visual conventions of a genre are violated. It also looks at what happens to the user performance and disorientation over time. Twenty-eight participants were randomly allocated to two independent groups: one was tested with a conventional website and the other with a convention-violating website. The study comprised of two parts and on each part participants were tested on a different website. Results showed that in the first part participants who used the violating site performed worse and were more disoriented than participants who used the conventional version. But the performance of the participants of the convention-violating group improved over time so that by the end of the first part performance on both groups were equivalent. In the second part performance and disorientation on both groups were equivalent suggesting that users might rapidly adapt to visual convention violations.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Ahuja, J. S. and Webster, J. Perceived disorientation: an examination of a new measure to assess web design effectiveness. Interacting with Computers, 14. 15--29.
 
2
Bartoshuk, L. M., Duffy, V. B., Fast, K., Green, B. G., Prutkin, J. and Snyder, D. J. Labeled scales (e.g., category, Likert, VAS) and invalid across-group comparisons: what we have learned from genetic variation in taste. Food Quality and Preference, 14 (2). 125--138.
 
3
Bernard, M. Developing schemas for the location of common web objects. Usability News, 3 (1).
 
4
Busch, M. and Turner, J. Using Likert scales in L2 research. TESOL Quarterly, 27 (4). 733--736.
 
5
 
6
Constantine, L. L. and Lockwood, L. A. D. Instructive interaction: Making innovative interfaces self-teaching. User Experience Magazine, 1 (3).
 
7
Delin, J., Bateman, J. and Allen, P. A Model of genre in document layout. Information Design Journal, 11 (1). 54 -- 66.
 
8
DeVigal, A. Putting the eyetrack study to good use, Poynter Institute, 2003.
 
9
 
10
Dillon, A. and Vaughan, M. It's the journey and the destination: Shape and the emergent property of genre in evaluating digital documents. New Review of Multimedia and Hypermedia, 3. 91--106.
11
 
12
 
13
Gu, Y., Wen, Q. and Wu, D. How Often Is Often? Reference Ambiguities of the Likert-Scale in Language Learning Strategy Research. Occasional Papers in English Language Teaching, 5. 19--35.
 
14
 
15
Herder, E., Revisitation patterns and disorientation. in German Workshop on Adaptivity and User Modeling in Interactive Systems: ABIS 2003, (Karlsruhe, 2003), 291--294.
 
16
Kalbach, J. and Bosenick, T. Web page layout: A comparison between left- and right-justified site navigation menus Journal of Digital Information, Texas Digital Library, 2006.
 
17
Markum, J. and Hall, R. H. E-commerce web objects: Importance and expected placement Laboratory for Information Technology Evaluation Technical Report, University of Missoury, 2003.
 
18
McCarthy, J. D., Sasse, A. M. and Riegelsberger, J., Could I have the Menu Please? An Eye Tracking Study of Design Conventions. in HCI2003, (Bath, UK, 2003).
 
19
Miller, C. R. Genre as a social action. Quarterly journal of speech, 70 (2). 151--167.
20
 
21
Nielsen, J. Do interface standards stifle design creativity? The alertbox: Current issues in Web usability, 1999.
 
22
Nielsen, J. When bad design elements become the standard The alertbox: Current issues in web usability, 1999.
 
23
Oulasvirta, A., Kärkkäinen, L. and Laarni, J. Expectations and memory in link search. Computer in Human Behaviour, 21. 773--789.
24
 
25
 
26
Santini, M., Genres In Formation? An Exploratory Study of Web Pages using Cluster Analysis. in CLUK - 8th Annual Computational Linguistics Research Colloquium, (Manchester, 2005).
 
27
Swales, J. M. Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1990.
 
28
Toms, E. G. Recognizing Digital Genres. Bulletin - American Society for Information Science.
 
29
 
30
Vickers, A. J. Comparison of an ordinal and a continuous outcome measure of muscle soreness. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 15 (04). 709--716.
 
31
Waller, R. The typographic contribution to language: towards a model of typographic genres and their underlying structures Department of Typography and Graphic Communication, University of Reading, Reading, 1987, 360.
32
 
33
Xu, G., Cockburn, A. and McKenzie, B., Lost on the web: An introduction to web navigation research. in 4th New Zealand Computer Science Research Students Conference, (Christchurch, New Zealand, 2001), University of Canterbury.
 
34
Yates, J. and Orlikowski, W. J. Genres of Organizational Communication: A Structurational Approach to Studying Communication and Media. Academy of Management Review, 17 (2). 299.

Collaborative Colleagues:
Luis Santa-Maria: colleagues
Mary C. Dyson: colleagues