| An access control reference architecture |
| Full text |
Pdf
(342 KB)
|
Source
|
Conference on Computer and Communications Security
archive
Proceedings of the 2nd ACM workshop on Computer security architectures
table of contents
Alexandria, Virginia, USA
SESSION: Host Security architecture
table of contents
Pages: 17-24
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-1-60558-300-6
|
|
Authors
|
|
Amir Jerbi
|
CA Inc., Herzilya, Israel
|
|
Ethan Hadar
|
CA Inc., Herzilya, Israel
|
|
Carrie Gates
|
CA Inc., Islandia, NY, USA
|
|
Dmitry Grebenev
|
CA inc., Islandia, NY, USA
|
|
| Sponsors |
|
| Publisher |
|
| Bibliometrics |
Downloads (6 Weeks): 5, Downloads (12 Months): 116, Citation Count: 0
|
|
|
ABSTRACT
System administrators typically have unrestricted access to all files and programs on a system, with no enforced principle of least privilege. Additionally, this unrestricted access causes challenges for audit as many different users might have superuser access and the audit trail may not distinguish between the actual users, recording instead all access as being by "superuser". These two issues result in further concerns regarding compliance for those organizations subject to government regulations (such as Sarbanes-Oxley in the United States). In this paper we present a reference architecture for an access control mechanism that addresses this issue by focusing specifically on the control and audit of system administrators. This reference architecture has been implemented and widely deployed. We describe some of its capabilities through a case study.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
Stephen R. Band, Dawn M. Cappelli, Lynn F. Fischer, Andrew P. Moore, Eric D. Shaw, and Randall F. Trzeciak. Comparing insider it sabotage and espionage: A model-based analysis. Technical Report CMU/SEI--2006--TR--026, CERT, Carnegie Mellon University, 2006.
|
| |
2
|
D. Elliott Bell and Leonard J. LaPadula. Secure computer systems: Mathematical foundations. Technical Report 2547, MITRE, March 1973.
|
| |
3
|
Dawn Cappelli, Andrew Moore, Timothy J. Shimeall, and Randall Trzeciak. Common sense guide to prevention and detection of insider threats. Technical report, Cylab, Carnegie Mellon University, July 2006.
|
 |
4
|
|
 |
5
|
|
| |
6
|
Department of Defense. Department of defense trusted computer system evaluation criteria. Technical Report DoD 5200.28-STD, Department of Defense, December 1985.
|
| |
7
|
|
| |
8
|
David Ferraiolo and Richard Kuhn. Role-based access control. In Proceedings of 15th National Computer Security Conference, 1992.
|
| |
9
|
|
 |
10
|
|
| |
11
|
Butler W. Lampson. Dynamic protection structures. In Proceedings of AFIPS Conference, pages 27--38, 1969.
|
| |
12
|
Peter A. Loscocco and Stephen D. Smalley. Meeting critical security objectives with security-enhanced linux. In Proceedings of the 2001 Ottawa Linux Symposium, 2001.
|
| |
13
|
Jerome H. Saltzer and Michael D. Schroeder. The protection of information in computer systems. Proceedings of the IEEE, 63(9):1278--1308, September 1975.
|
| |
14
|
|
| |
15
|
Ray Spencer , Stephen Smalley , Peter Loscocco , Mike Hibler , David Andersen , Jay Lepreau, The flask security architecture: system support for diverse security policies, Proceedings of the 8th conference on USENIX Security Symposium, p.11-11, August 23-26, 1999, Washington, D.C.
|
| |
16
|
|
|