ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
An access control reference architecture
Full text PdfPdf (342 KB)
Source
Conference on Computer and Communications Security archive
Proceedings of the 2nd ACM workshop on Computer security architectures table of contents
Alexandria, Virginia, USA
SESSION: Host Security architecture table of contents
Pages 17-24  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-1-60558-300-6
Authors
Amir Jerbi  CA Inc., Herzilya, Israel
Ethan Hadar  CA Inc., Herzilya, Israel
Carrie Gates  CA Inc., Islandia, NY, USA
Dmitry Grebenev  CA inc., Islandia, NY, USA
Sponsors
SIGSAC: ACM Special Interest Group on Security, Audit, and Control
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 15,   Downloads (12 Months): 160,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1456508.1456513
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

System administrators typically have unrestricted access to all files and programs on a system, with no enforced principle of least privilege. Additionally, this unrestricted access causes challenges for audit as many different users might have superuser access and the audit trail may not distinguish between the actual users, recording instead all access as being by "superuser". These two issues result in further concerns regarding compliance for those organizations subject to government regulations (such as Sarbanes-Oxley in the United States). In this paper we present a reference architecture for an access control mechanism that addresses this issue by focusing specifically on the control and audit of system administrators. This reference architecture has been implemented and widely deployed. We describe some of its capabilities through a case study.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Stephen R. Band, Dawn M. Cappelli, Lynn F. Fischer, Andrew P. Moore, Eric D. Shaw, and Randall F. Trzeciak. Comparing insider it sabotage and espionage: A model-based analysis. Technical Report CMU/SEI--2006--TR--026, CERT, Carnegie Mellon University, 2006.
 
2
D. Elliott Bell and Leonard J. LaPadula. Secure computer systems: Mathematical foundations. Technical Report 2547, MITRE, March 1973.
 
3
Dawn Cappelli, Andrew Moore, Timothy J. Shimeall, and Randall Trzeciak. Common sense guide to prevention and detection of insider threats. Technical report, Cylab, Carnegie Mellon University, July 2006.
4
5
 
6
Department of Defense. Department of defense trusted computer system evaluation criteria. Technical Report DoD 5200.28-STD, Department of Defense, December 1985.
 
7
 
8
David Ferraiolo and Richard Kuhn. Role-based access control. In Proceedings of 15th National Computer Security Conference, 1992.
 
9
10
 
11
Butler W. Lampson. Dynamic protection structures. In Proceedings of AFIPS Conference, pages 27--38, 1969.
 
12
Peter A. Loscocco and Stephen D. Smalley. Meeting critical security objectives with security-enhanced linux. In Proceedings of the 2001 Ottawa Linux Symposium, 2001.
 
13
Jerome H. Saltzer and Michael D. Schroeder. The protection of information in computer systems. Proceedings of the IEEE, 63(9):1278--1308, September 1975.
 
14
 
15
 
16

Collaborative Colleagues:
Amir Jerbi: colleagues
Ethan Hadar: colleagues
Carrie Gates: colleagues
Dmitry Grebenev: colleagues