| Robust remote data checking |
| Full text |
Pdf
(495 KB)
|
Source
|
Conference on Computer and Communications Security
archive
Proceedings of the 4th ACM international workshop on Storage security and survivability
table of contents
Alexandria, Virginia, USA
SESSION: Untrusted storage
table of contents
Pages 63-68
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-1-60558-299-3
|
|
Authors
|
|
Reza Curtmola
|
New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, NJ, USA
|
|
Osama Khan
|
Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
|
|
Randal Burns
|
Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
|
|
| Sponsors |
|
| Publisher |
|
| Bibliometrics |
Downloads (6 Weeks): 10, Downloads (12 Months): 98, Citation Count: 0
|
|
|
ABSTRACT
Remote data checking protocols, such as provable data possession (PDP) [1], allow clients that outsource data to untrusted servers to verify that the server continues to correctly store the data. Through the careful integration of forward error-correcting codes and remote data checking, a system can prove possession with arbitrarily high probability. We formalize this notion in the robust data possession guarantee. We distill the key performance and security requirements for integrating forward error-correcting codes into PDP and describe an encoding scheme and file organization for robust data possession that meets these requirements. We give a detailed analysis of this scheme and build a Monte-Carlo simulation to evaluate tradeoffs in reliability, space overhead, and performance. A practical way to evaluate these tradeoffs is an essential input to system design, allowing the designer to choose the encoding and data checking protocol parameters that realize robust data possession.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
 |
1
|
Giuseppe Ateniese , Randal Burns , Reza Curtmola , Joseph Herring , Lea Kissner , Zachary Peterson , Dawn Song, Provable data possession at untrusted stores, Proceedings of the 14th ACM conference on Computer and communications security, October 28-31, 2007, Alexandria, Virginia, USA
[doi> 10.1145/1315245.1315318]
|
 |
2
|
|
| |
3
|
K. Bowers, A. Juels, and A. Oprea. Proofs of retrievability: Theory and implementation. ePrint Archive Report, (2008/175), 2008.
|
| |
4
|
|
| |
5
|
E.-J. Goh, H. Shacham, N. Modadugu, and D. Boneh. Sirius: Securing remote untrusted storage. In Proc. of NDSS'03, 2003.
|
 |
6
|
|
| |
7
|
|
| |
8
|
M. N. Krohn, M. J. Freedman, and D. Mazières. On-the-fly verification of rateless erasure codes for efficient content distribution. In IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, 2004.
|
 |
9
|
Michael G. Luby , Michael Mitzenmacher , M. Amin Shokrollahi , Daniel A. Spielman , Volker Stemann, Practical loss-resilient codes, Proceedings of the twenty-ninth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing, p.150-159, May 04-06, 1997, El Paso, Texas, United States
[doi> 10.1145/258533.258573]
|
| |
10
|
P. Maymounkov and D. Mazieres. Rateless codes and big downloads. In International Workshop on Peer-to-Peer Systems, 2003.
|
 |
11
|
|
| |
12
|
M. Mitzenmacher. Digital fountains: A survey and look forward. In IEEE Information Theory Workshop, 2004.
|
| |
13
|
I. S. Reed and G. Solomon. Polynomial codes over certain finite fields. Journal of the Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, 8(2):300--304, 1960.
|
| |
14
|
|
| |
15
|
H. Shacham and B. Waters. Compact proofs of retrievability. ePrint Archive Report, (2008/073), 2008.
|
| |
16
|
M. A. Shah, R. Swaminathan, and M. Baker. Privacy-preserving audit and extraction of digital contents. ePrint Archive Report, (2008/186).
|
|