ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Robust remote data checking
Full text PdfPdf (495 KB)
Source
Conference on Computer and Communications Security archive
Proceedings of the 4th ACM international workshop on Storage security and survivability table of contents
Alexandria, Virginia, USA
SESSION: Untrusted storage table of contents
Pages 63-68  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-1-60558-299-3
Authors
Reza Curtmola  New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, NJ, USA
Osama Khan  Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
Randal Burns  Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGSAC: ACM Special Interest Group on Security, Audit, and Control
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 10,   Downloads (12 Months): 98,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1456469.1456481
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Remote data checking protocols, such as provable data possession (PDP) [1], allow clients that outsource data to untrusted servers to verify that the server continues to correctly store the data. Through the careful integration of forward error-correcting codes and remote data checking, a system can prove possession with arbitrarily high probability. We formalize this notion in the robust data possession guarantee. We distill the key performance and security requirements for integrating forward error-correcting codes into PDP and describe an encoding scheme and file organization for robust data possession that meets these requirements. We give a detailed analysis of this scheme and build a Monte-Carlo simulation to evaluate tradeoffs in reliability, space overhead, and performance. A practical way to evaluate these tradeoffs is an essential input to system design, allowing the designer to choose the encoding and data checking protocol parameters that realize robust data possession.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
2
 
3
K. Bowers, A. Juels, and A. Oprea. Proofs of retrievability: Theory and implementation. ePrint Archive Report, (2008/175), 2008.
 
4
 
5
E.-J. Goh, H. Shacham, N. Modadugu, and D. Boneh. Sirius: Securing remote untrusted storage. In Proc. of NDSS'03, 2003.
6
 
7
 
8
M. N. Krohn, M. J. Freedman, and D. Mazières. On-the-fly verification of rateless erasure codes for efficient content distribution. In IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, 2004.
9
 
10
P. Maymounkov and D. Mazieres. Rateless codes and big downloads. In International Workshop on Peer-to-Peer Systems, 2003.
11
 
12
M. Mitzenmacher. Digital fountains: A survey and look forward. In IEEE Information Theory Workshop, 2004.
 
13
I. S. Reed and G. Solomon. Polynomial codes over certain finite fields. Journal of the Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, 8(2):300--304, 1960.
 
14
 
15
H. Shacham and B. Waters. Compact proofs of retrievability. ePrint Archive Report, (2008/073), 2008.
 
16
M. A. Shah, R. Swaminathan, and M. Baker. Privacy-preserving audit and extraction of digital contents. ePrint Archive Report, (2008/186).

Collaborative Colleagues:
Reza Curtmola: colleagues
Osama Khan: colleagues
Randal Burns: colleagues