ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Flexible and secure enterprise rights management based on trusted virtual domains
Full text PdfPdf (1.82 MB)
Source
Conference on Computer and Communications Security archive
Proceedings of the 3rd ACM workshop on Scalable trusted computing table of contents
Alexandria, Virginia, USA
SESSION: Applications of trusted computing table of contents
Pages 71-80  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-1-60558-295-5
Authors
Yacine Gasmi  Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
Ahmad-Reza Sadeghi  Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
Patrick Stewin  Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
Martin Unger  Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
Marcel Winandy  Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
Rani Husseiki  Sirrix AG security technologies, Bochum, Germany
Christian Stüble  Sirrix AG security technologies, Bochum, Germany
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGSAC: ACM Special Interest Group on Security, Audit, and Control
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 22,   Downloads (12 Months): 219,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1456455.1456467
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

The requirements for secure document workflows in enterprises become increasingly sophisticated, with employees performing different tasks under different roles using the same proprietary platform. Particularly, fine-grained access control to document information is necessary in certain scenarios where the integrity and confidentiality of parts of documents is of high priority.

In this paper, we present a secure and flexible Enterprise Rights Management (ERM) system based on a refined version of the Trusted Virtual Domains (TVDs) security model that allows to establish isolated execution environments spanning over virtual entities across separate physical resources. Our security concept achieves a two-layered policy enforcement on documents: a TVD Policy ensuring isolation of the workflow from other tasks on the user platforms, and a role-based document-policy ensuring both confidentiality and integrity of document parts. Moreover, in contrast to existing solutions, our architecture offers advanced features for secure document workflows such as offline access to documents and transparent encryption of documents exchanged via USB, external storage or VPN communication between peer platforms. We also shed the light on key management, document structure and document policy enforcement mechanisms to support the ERM infrastructure. Finally, we prove our concept based on an implementation.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Adobe Systems Inc. Adobe LiveCycle Policy Server: Document-level persistent protection and dynamic control for multiformat enterprise rights management. http://www.adobe.com/de/products/server/policy/pdfs/ps_datasheet.pdf, 2006.
 
2
A. Arnab and A. Hutchison. Requirement analysis of enterprise DRM systems. In Information Security South Africa, 2005.
 
3
Authentica Inc. Page Recall: The Key to Document Protection. http://www.adobe.com/de/products/server/policy/pdfs/ps_datasheet.pdf, 2002.
 
4
 
5
6
 
7
D. F. C. Brewer and M. J. Nash. The Chinese Wall Security Policy. In Proceedings of the 1989 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, pages 206--214. IEEE, 1989.
 
8
A. Bussani, J. L. Griffin, B. Jasen, K. Julisch, G. Karjoth, H. Maruyama, M. Nakamura, R. Perez, M. Schunter, A. Tanner, L. V. Doorn, E. V. Herreweghen, M. Waidner, and S. Yoshihama. Trusted Virtual Domains: Secure Foundations for Business and IT Services. Technical Report Research Report RC23792, November 2005.
9
 
10
Y. Dodis and N. Fazio. Public key broadcast encryption for stateless receivers. In Proceedings of the Digital Rights Management Workshop 2002, volume 2696 of LNCS, pages 61--80, 2002.
 
11
European Multilaterally Secure Computing Base (EMSCB) Project. Towards Trustworthy Systems with Open Standards and Trusted Computing, 2008. http://www.emscb.de.
12
13
 
14
E. Gaudet. DRM vs. ERM: battle to control data. http://www.networkworld.com/news/tech/2006/121806techupdate.html, December 2006.
 
15
J. L. Griffin, T. Jaeger, R. Perez, R. Sailer, L. van Doorn, , and R. C-aceres. Trusted Virtual Domains: Toward Secure Distributed Services. In 1st IEEE Workshop on Hot Topics in System Dependability, June 2005.
 
16
17
 
18
Y. Katsuno, M. Kudo, P. Perez, and R. Sailer. Towards Multi-Layer Trusted Virtual Domains, 2006.
 
19
The 2nd Workshop on Advances in Trusted Computing.
20
 
21
V. Likitalo. Remote Attestation and Peer-to-Peer Net. http://www.tml.tkk.fi/Publications/C/18/likitalo.pdf, 2005.
22
 
23
Microsoft. Microsoft Windows Rights Management Services for Windows Server 2003 -- Helping Organizations Safeguard Digital Information from Unauthorized Use. Whitepaper, 2003.
 
24
 
25
 
26
J. Reid and W. Caelli. DRM, Trusted Computing and Operating System Architecture. 2005.
 
27
A. Sadeghi, M. Wolf, C. Stuble, N. Asokan, and J. Ekberg. Enabling Fairer Digital Rights Management with Trusted Computing, October 2007.
 
28
 
29
30
31
 
32
S. Schechter, R. Greenstadt, and M. Smith. Trusted Computing, Peer-To-Peer Distribution, and the Economics of Pirated Entertainment. In The Second Annual Workshop on Economics and Information Security, May 2003.
 
33
E. Sebes and M. Stamp. Solvable Problems in Enterprise Digital Rights Management. http://home.earthlink.net/~mstamp1/papers/DRMsebes.pdf, 2004.
 
34
 
35
Trusted Computing Group. TCG Specification Architecture Overview. Trusted Computing Group: https://www.trustedcomputinggroup.org/groups/TCG_1_3_Architecture_Overview.pdf, Mar. 2003. Specification Revision 1.3 28th March 2007.
 
36
Trusted Computing Group. TPM Main Specification v1.2. https://www.trustedcomputinggroup.org, November 2003.
 
37
Y. Yu and T. Chiueh. Display-Only File Server: A Solution against Information Theft Due to Insider Attack. October 2004.

Collaborative Colleagues:
Yacine Gasmi: colleagues
Ahmad-Reza Sadeghi: colleagues
Patrick Stewin: colleagues
Martin Unger: colleagues
Marcel Winandy: colleagues
Rani Husseiki: colleagues
Christian Stüble: colleagues