ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
A survey of state-of-the-art in anonymity metrics
Full text PdfPdf (410 KB)
Source
Conference on Computer and Communications Security archive
Proceedings of the 1st ACM workshop on Network data anonymization table of contents
Alexandria, Virginia, USA
SESSION: Anonymization techniques and metrics table of contents
Pages 31-40  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-1-60558-301-3
Authors
Douglas J. Kelly  Air Force Institute of Technology, Dayton, OH, USA
Richard A. Raines  Air Force Institute of Technology, Dayton, OH, USA
Michael R. Grimaila  Air Force Institute of Technology, Dayton, OH, USA
Rusty O. Baldwin  Air Force Institute of Technology, Dayton, OH, USA
Barry E. Mullins  Air Force Institute of Technology, Dayton, OH, USA
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGSAC: ACM Special Interest Group on Security, Audit, and Control
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 43,   Downloads (12 Months): 272,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1456441.1456453
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Anonymization enables organizations to protect their data and systems from a diverse set of attacks and preserve privacy; however, in the area of anonymized network data, few, if any, are able to precisely quantify how anonymized their information is for any particular dataset. Indeed, recent research indicates that many anonymization techniques leak some information. An ability to confidently measure this information leakage and any changes in anonymity levels plays a crucial role in facilitating the free-flow of cross-organizational network data sharing and promoting wider adoption of anonyimzation techniques. Fortunately, multiple methods of analyzing anonymity exist. Typical approaches use simple quantifications and probabilistic models; however, to the best of our knowledge, only one network data anonymization metric has been proposed. More importantly, no one-stop-shop paper exists that comprehensively surveys this area for other candidate measures; therefore, this paper explores the state-of-the-art of anonymity metrics. The objective is to provide a macro-level view of the systematic analysis of anonymity preservation, degradation, or elimination for data anonymization as well as network communciations anonymization.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
G. F. Coull, C. V. Wright, A. D. Keromytis, F. Monrose, and M. Reiter, "Taming the Devil: Techniques for Evaluating Anonymized Network Data," presented at Internet Society (ISOC) Symposium on Network and Distributed Systems Security (SNDSS), San Diego, CA, 2008.
 
2
C. E. Shannon, "A Mathematical Theory of Communication," Bell System Technical Journal, vol. 27, pp. 379--423, 623--656, 1948.
 
3
C. Diaz, S. Seys, J. Claessens, and B. Preneel, "Towards Measuring Anonymity," presented at Privacy Enhancing Technologies Workshop (PET), 2002.
 
4
C. Diaz, J. Claessens, S. Seys, and B. Preneel, "Information Theory and Anonymity," presented at 23rd Symposium on Information Theory in the Benelux, Louvain la Neuve, Belgium, 2002.
5
 
6
M. Wright, M. Adler, B. Levine, and C. Shields, "An Analysis of the Degradation of Anonymous Protocols," presented at Network and Distributed Security Symposium (NDSS), 2002.
 
7
 
8
G. Shafer, A Mathematical Theory of Evidence. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1976.
 
9
R. Yager, "Entropy and Specificity in a Mathematical Theory of Evidence," International Journal of General Systems, vol. 9, pp. 249--260, 1983.
 
10
F. Cuzzolin, "The Theory of Evidence," 2005.
 
11
H. Dijiang, "On Measuring Anonymity For Wireless Mobile Ad-hoc Networks," presented at 31st IEEE Local Computer Networks Conference, 2006.
 
12
 
13
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
A. Pfitzmann and M. Kohntopp, "Anonymity, Unobservability, and Pseudonymity -- A Proposal for Terminology," presented at Workshop on Design Issues in Anonymity and Unobservability, Berkeley, CA, USA, 2000.
 
19
 
20
21
 
22
A. Serjantov and G. Danezis, "Towards an Information Theoretic Metric for Anonymity," presented at Privacy Enhancing Technologies Workshop (PET), 2002.
 
23
N. Li, T. Li, and S. Venkatasubramanian, "t-Closeness: Privacy Beyond k-Anonymity and l-Diversity," presented at IEEE 23rd International Conference on Data Engineering, 2007.
24
 
25
M. Edman, F. Sivrikaya, and B. Yener, "A Combinatorial Approach to Measuring Anonymity," presented at IEEE Intelligence and Security Informatics, 2007.
 
26
W. Xiaoxin and E. Bertino, "Achieving K-anonymity in Mobile Ad Hoc Networks," presented at 1st IEEE ICNP Workshop on Secure Network Protocols (NPSec'05). , 2005.

Collaborative Colleagues:
Douglas J. Kelly: colleagues
Richard A. Raines: colleagues
Michael R. Grimaila: colleagues
Rusty O. Baldwin: colleagues
Barry E. Mullins: colleagues