ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Identity federation and privacy: one step beyond
Full text PdfPdf (228 KB)
Source
Conference on Computer and Communications Security archive
Proceedings of the 4th ACM workshop on Digital identity management table of contents
Alexandria, Virginia, USA
SESSION: Federation for services table of contents
Pages 25-32  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-1-60558-294-8
Authors
Sébastien Canard  Orange Labs R&D, Caen, France
Eric Malville  Orange Labs R&D, Caen, France
Jacques Traoré  Orange Labs R&D, Caen, France
Sponsors
SIGSAC: ACM Special Interest Group on Security, Audit, and Control
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 32,   Downloads (12 Months): 191,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1456424.1456430
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Providing Single Sign-On (SSO) between SPs and enabling SPs to share user personal attributes are critical for both users to benefit from a seamless access to their services, and SPs to realize new business opportunities. Today, however, the users have several independent, partial identities spread over different SPs. Providing SSO and attribute sharing requires that links (federations) are established between (partial) identities. In Liberty and SAML, the links between identities are stored and managed at the network side by the IdPs (network-side identity federation). This model prevents the SPs from mass-correlating the partial identities they have, but the users must fully trust the IdPs. In this paper, we propose a complementary approach where the users have a full control of the links between the partial identities. This client-side identity federation approach relies on the introduction of a new cryptographic tool, called invariable partially blind signature scheme, that may be of independent interest.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
Liberty Alliance. http://www.projectliberty.org/.
 
3
 
4
Jan Camenisch, Jean-Marc Piveteau, and Markus Stadler. Blind signatures based on the discrete logarithm problem. In EUROCRYPT'94, pages 428--432, 1994.
 
5
CardSpace. http://netfx3.com/content/windowscardspacehome.aspx.
 
6
David Chaum. Blind signatures for untraceable payments. In CRYPTO, pages 199-203, 1982.
 
7
David Chaum. Blind signature system. In CRYPTO, page 153, 1983.
 
8
 
9
 
10
E. Maler, P. Mishra, and R. Philpott. Assertions and protocol for the oasis security assertion markup language (saml). OASIS Standard, September 2003.
 
11
OpenID. http://openid.net/.
 
12

Collaborative Colleagues:
Sébastien Canard: colleagues
Eric Malville: colleagues
Jacques Traoré: colleagues