ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Protecting privacy with protocol stack virtualization
Full text PdfPdf (377 KB)
Source
Conference on Computer and Communications Security archive
Proceedings of the 7th ACM workshop on Privacy in the electronic society table of contents
Alexandria, Virginia, USA
SESSION: Data privacy table of contents
Pages 65-74  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-1-60558-289-4
Authors
Janne Lindqvist  Helsinki University of Technology, Espoo, Finland
Juha-Matti Tapio  Helsinki University of Technology, Espoo, Finland
Sponsors
SIGSAC: ACM Special Interest Group on Security, Audit, and Control
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 9,   Downloads (12 Months): 152,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1456403.1456416
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Previously proposed host-based privacy protection mechanisms use pseudorandom or disposable identifiers on some or all layers of the protocol stack. These approaches either require changes to all hosts participating in the communication or do not provide privacy for the whole protocol stack or the system. Building on previous work, we propose a relatively simple approach: protocol stack virtualization. The key idea is to provide isolation for traffic sent to the network. The granularity of the isolation can be, for example, flow or process based. With process based granularity, every application uses a distinct identifier space on all layers of the protocol stack. This approach does not need any infrastructure support from the network and requires only minor changes to the single host that implements the privacy protection mechanism. To show that no changes to typical applications are required, we implemented the protocol stack virtualization as a user space daemon and tested it with various legacy applications.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
2
 
3
J. Arkko, P. Nikander, and M. N0slund. Enhancing Privacy with Shared Pseudo Random Sequences (preliminary version). In Security Protocols, 13rd International Workshop, Apr. 2005.
 
4
 
5
T. Aura, M. Roe, and S. J. Murdoch. Securing Network Location Awareness with Authenticated DHCP. In 3rd International Conference on Security and Privacy in Communication Networks (SecureComm), Sept. 2007.
 
6
T. Aura and A. Zugenmaier. Privacy, Control and Internet Mobility. In Security Protocols, 12th International Workshop, Apr. 2004.
7
8
 
9
R. Dingledine and N. Mathewson. Anonymity Loves Company: Usability and the Network Effect. In Workshop on the Economics of Information Security, June 2006.
 
10
 
11
N. Droux, S. Tripathi, and K. Belgaied. Crossbow: Network virtualization and resource control. http://www.usenix.org/events/usenix07/posters/droux.pdf.
 
12
13
 
14
R. Gerdes, T. Daniels, M. Mina, and S. Russell. Device identification via analog signal fingerprinting: A matched filter approach. In Network and Distributed System Security Symposium (NDSS), Feb. 2006.
 
15
 
16
J. A. Goguen and J. Meseguer. Security policies and security models. In IEEE Symposium on Research in Security and Privacy, Apr. 1982.
 
17
 
18
 
19
S. Guha and P. Francis. Identity Trail: Covert Surveillance Using DNS. In Workshop on Privacy Enhancing Technologies (PET), June 2007.
 
20
 
21
 
22
T. Jiang, H. J. Wang, and Y.-C. Hu. Location privacy in wireless networks. In MobiSys, June 2007.
 
23
S. Katti, J. Cohen, and D. Katabi. Information Slicing: Anonymity Using Unreliable Overlays. In NSDI, Apr. 2007.
 
24
25
 
26
27
28
 
29
T. Narten, R. Draves, and S. Krishnan. RFC 4941: Privacy Extensions for Stateless Address Autoconfiguration in IPv6, Sept. 2007. Status: Draft Standard.
 
30
Nmap. http://www.insecure.org/nmap/.
31
 
32
 
33
Planetlab. https://www.planet-lab.org/.
34
 
35
36
 
37
 
38
G. Su and J. Nieh. Mobile communication with virtual network address translation. CUCS--003--02, Columbia University Department of Computer Science, Feb. 2002.
 
39
S. Thomson, T. Narten, and T. Jinmei. RFC 4862: IPv6 Stateless Address Autoconfiguration, Sept. 2007. Status: Draft Standard.
 
40
VMware. http://www.vmware.com.
 
41
 
42
A. R. Yumerefendi, B. Mickle, and L. P. Cox. TightLip: Keeping Applications from Spilling the Beans. In NSDI, Apr. 2007.
 
43
K. Zetter. Rogue nodes turn tor anonymizer into eavesdropper's paradise. Wired, Sept. 2007.

Collaborative Colleagues:
Janne Lindqvist: colleagues
Juha-Matti Tapio: colleagues