ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
TwoKind authentication: protecting private information in untrustworthy environments
Full text PdfPdf (346 KB)
Source
Conference on Computer and Communications Security archive
Proceedings of the 7th ACM workshop on Privacy in the electronic society table of contents
Alexandria, Virginia, USA
SESSION: Usability table of contents
Pages 39-44  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-1-60558-289-4
Authors
Katelin Bailey  Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA
Apu Kapadia  Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA
Linden Vongsathorn  Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA
Sean W. Smith  Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA
Sponsors
SIGSAC: ACM Special Interest Group on Security, Audit, and Control
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 9,   Downloads (12 Months): 78,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1456403.1456412
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Users often log in to Internet sites from insecure computers and more recently have started divulging their email passwords to social-networking sites, thereby putting their private communications at risk. We propose and evaluate TwoKind Authentication, a simple and effective technique for limiting access to private information in untrustworthy environments. In its simplest form, TwoKind offers two modes of authentication by providing a low and a high authenticator. By using a low authenticator, users can signal to the server that they are in an untrusted environment, following which the server restricts the user's actions.

We seek to evaluate the effectiveness of multiple authenticators in promoting safer behavior in users. We demonstrate the effectiveness of this approach through a user experiment - we find that users make a distinction between the two authenticators and generally behave in a security-conscious way, protecting their high authenticator the ma jority of the time. Our study suggests that TwoKind will be beneficial to several Internet applications, particularly if the privileges associated with the low authenticator can be customized to a user's security preferences.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
K. Bailey, A. Kapadia, L. Vongsathorn, and S. W. Smith. TwoKind authentication: Protecting private information in untrustworthy environments (extended version). Technical Report TR2008--632, Dartmouth College, Aug 2008.
2
 
3
4
 
5
eTrade Trading Passwords. https://www.etradeaustralia.com.au/EStation/hep aec connecting.asp.
 
6
7
8
 
9
J. Marchesini and S. W. Smith. SHEMP: Secure Hardware Enhanced MyProxy. In PST, 2005.
 
10
J. Marchesini, S. W. Smith, and M. Zhao. Keyjacking: the surprising insecurity of client-side SSL. Computers and Security, 24(2):109--123, 2005.
 
11
RSA SecurID. http://www.rsa.com/node.aspx?id=1156.
 
12
J. H. Saltzer and M. D. Schroeder. The protection of information in computer systems. Communications of the ACM, 17(7), July 1974.
 
13
A. Seshadri, A. Perrig, L. van Doorn, and P. Khosla. SWAtt: Software-based attestation for embedded devices. In Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, May 2004.
 
14
 
15

Collaborative Colleagues:
Katelin Bailey: colleagues
Apu Kapadia: colleagues
Linden Vongsathorn: colleagues
Sean W. Smith: colleagues