Forensic genomics: kin privacy, driftnets and other open questions

ABSTRACT

DNA analysis is increasingly used in forensics, where it is being pushed as the holy grail of identification. But we are approaching a dramatic "phase change" as we move from genetics to genomics: when sequencing the entire genome of a person becomes sufficiently cheap as to become a routine operation, as is likely to happen in the coming decades, then each DNA examination will expose a wealth of very sensitive personal information about the examined individual, as well as her relatives. In this interdisciplinary discussion paper we highlight the complexity of DNA-related privacy issues as we move into the genomic (as opposed to genetic) era: the "driftnet" approach of comparing scene-of-crime samples against the DNA of the whole population rather than just against that of chosen suspects; the potential for errors in forensic DNA analysis and the consequences on security and privacy; the civil liberties implications of the interaction between medical and forensic applications of genomics. For example, your kin can provide valuable information in a database matching procedure against you even if you don't; and being able to read the whole of a sampled genome, rather than just 13 specific markers from it, provides information about the medical and physical characteristics of the individual.

Our aim is to offer a simple but thought-provoking and technically accurate summary of the many issues involved, hoping to stimulate an informed public debate on the statutes by which DNA collection, storage and processing should be regulated.

REFERENCES

• 1: "New Grants Drive Development Of Rapid, Cost-Effective Sequencing Technologies", Medical News Today, 2008--08--23, http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/118963.php
• 2: http://www.iht.com/articles/2007/06/01/america/dna.php
• 3: http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/12/science/12watson.html
• 4: Gill P, Ivanov PL, Kimpton C, Piercy R, Benson N, Tully G, Evett I, Hagelberg E, Sullivan K. "Identification of the remains of the Romanov family by DNA analysis". Nat Genet. 1994 Feb;6(2):130--5.
• 5: Balding, D. J. and Donnelly, P. (1995). "Inference in forensic identification". Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A 158, 21--53.
• 6: BBC News. "Germany adopts Stasi scent tactic". 2007--05--23. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/6683803.stm
• 7: Philip Bohannon , Markus Jakobsson , Sukamol Srikwan, Cryptographic Approaches to Provacy in Forensic DNA Databases, Proceedings of the Third International Workshop on Practice and Theory in Public Key Cryptography: Public Key Cryptography, p.373-390, January 18-20, 2000
• 8: Helm, T.: "Outrage at 500,000 DNA database mistakes". Telegraph, 2007-08-27 http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/08/27/ndna127.xml
• 9: Balding D., Donnelly P. (1996) "Evaluating DNA Profile Evidence When the Suspect Is Identified Through a Database Search". J Forensic Sci 41, 603--607.
• 10: National Research Council (NRC). "The evaluation of forensic DNA evidence". Technical report, National Academy Press, Washington D. C., 1996.
• 11: Singh SM, Murphy B, O'Reilly R. "Epigenetic contributors to the discordance of monozygotic twins". Clin Genet. 2002 Aug; 62(2):97--103.
• 12: Phillip R. Garrison (Judge), Adams vs Miller and Miller, Case number 27188, 2007--03--14, Missouri Court of Appeals Southern District, http://www.courts.mo.gov/Courts/PubOpinions. nsf/8e937ac7ce0301288625661f004bc963/67393c1c232272598625729e0075ff81? OpenDocument.
• 13: Hsien-Hsien Lei, "Genetic Differences Between Identical Twins", http://www.eyeondna.com/2008/02/page/2/, 2008--02--20.
• 14: Testimony of Philip R. Zimmermann to the Subcommittee on Science, Technology, and Space of the US Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. 1996--06--26. http://www.philzimmermann.com/EN/testimony/index.html
• 15: Frederick R Bieber, Charles H Brenner and David Lazer, "Finding Criminals Through DNA of Their Relatives", Sciencexpress, 2006--05--11.
• 16: Donnelly, P. and Friedman, D. "DNA database searches and the legal consumption of scientific evidence", Michigan Law Review 97, 931--984, 1999.
• 17: Storvik, G. and Egeland, TB. "The DNA database search controversy revisited: Bridging the Bayesian - Frequentistic gap". Biometrics 63 pp 922--925, 2007.
• 18: Pan Q, Luo X, Chegini N. "Genomic and proteomic profiling I: leiomyomas in African Americans and Caucasians". Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2007 Aug 23; 5:34.
• 19: Collins-Schramm HE, Phillips CM, Operario DJ, Lee JS, Weber JL, Hanson RL, Knowler WC, Cooper R, Li H, Seldin MF. "Ethnic-difference markers for use in mapping by admixture linkage disequilibrium". Am J Hum Genet. 2002 Mar;70(3):737--50. Epub 2002 Feb 11.
• 20: Collins T, "Loss of 1.3 million sensitive medical files in the US", ComputerWeekly, July 2007, http://www.computerweekly.com/blogs/tony_collins/2007/07/loss-of-13-million-sensitive-m.html.
• 21: BBC, "Thousands of driver details lost", 2007-12-11, http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/northern_ireland/7138408.stm.
• 22: B. Heffernan and E. Kennedy, "Alert as 170,000 blood donor files are stolen", 2008-02-20, http://www.independent.ie/national-news/alert-as-170000-blood-donor-files-are-stolen-1294079.html.
• 23: Council of Europe, European Convention on Bio-medicine (ETS 164, the "Oviedo Convention"), Art. 11.
• 24: EU Charter of Fundamental Rights, Art. 21.
• 25: UNESCO, "Universal Declaration on Human Genome and Human Rights", Article 6.
• 26: "US House Passes Genetic Discrimination Bill", Genome Web News, New York, 1 May 2008.
• 27: Article 29 Working Party (WP), "Working Document on Genetic Data" (WP 91 of 17 March 2004).
• 28: Article 29 Working Party (WP), "Opinion 6/2000 on the Genome Issue" (WP 34 of 13th July 2000)
• 29: Article 29 Working Party (WP), "Working Document on Biometrics" (WP 80 of 1 August 2003).
• 30: D. Korff, "The need to apply UK data protection law in accordance with European law", Data Protection Law & Policy, May 2008.
• 31: D. Korff, "Study on Implementation of Data Protection Directive -- Comparative Summary of National Laws", Study for the EC Commission, 2003.
• 32: R Anderson, I Brown, R Clayton, T Dowty, D Korff, E Munro. "Children's Databases -- Safety and Privacy" (2006), FIPR study for the UK Information Commissioner.
• 33: BBC, "All UK must be on DNA database", BBC News, 5 September 2007 http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/6979138.stm
• 34: "Britain needs DNA database, says officer who headed Sally Anne murder inquiry", Times Online, 22 February 2008.
• 35: "Mandatory DNA database rejected", BBC News, 23 February 2008 http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7260164.stm.
• 36: Genewatch, "The UK Police National DNA Database" http://www.genewatch.org/sub-539478.
• 37: "The 100 dollars Genome". Technology Review, published by MIT, April 17, 2008. http://www.technologyreview.com/Biotech/20640/page1/
• 38: P. Kuzniar, E. Jastrzebska, R. Ploski. "Validation of nine non-CODIS STR loci for forensic use in a population from Central Poland". Forensic Science International, Volume 159, Issue 2--3 , Pages 258--260.
• 39: J S. Barnholtz-Sloan, R Chakraborty, T A. Sellers and A G.Schwartz. "Examining Population Stratification via Individual Ancestry Estimates versus Self-Reported Race". Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention Vol. 14, 1545--1551, June 2005.
• 40: Harris MA et al., Gene Ontology Consortium. "The Gene Ontology (GO) database and informatics resource". Nucleic Acids Res. 2004 Jan 1;32 (Database issue): D258--61.
• 41: Ashburner M, Lewis S. "On ontologies for biologists: the Gene Ontology-untangling the web". Novartis Found Symp. 2002;247:66--80; discussion 80-3, 84--90, 244--52.
• 42: Gilks WR, Audit B, de Angelis D, Tsoka S, Ouzounis CA. "Percolation of annotation errors through hierarchically structured protein sequence databases." Math Biosci. 2005 Feb;193(2):223--34.
• 43: Jacoby E. "Chemogenomics: drug discovery's panacea?" Mol Biosyst. 2006 May;2(5):218--20. Epub 2006 Mar 30.
• 44: "Simpson lawyers switch emphasis to police errors". USA Today http://www.usatoday.com/news/index/nns133.htm
• 45: "What is the chance of your being guilty?" Financial Times 19 June 2003. http://www.johnkay.com/society/287
• 46: "Evaluating Legal Evidence". Department of Computer Science, Queen Mary University 9 May 2008. http://www.dcs.qmul.ac.uk/researchgp/spotlight/legal.html
• 47: Levinson DF, Holmans P. "The effect of linkage disequilibrium on linkage analysis of incomplete pedigrees." BMC Genet. 2005 Dec 30;6 Suppl 1:S6.
• 48: Gasbarra D, Pirinen M, Sillanpää MJ, Arjas E. "Estimating genealogies from linked marker data: a Bayesian approach." BMC Bioinformatics. 2007 Oct 25;8:41.
• 49: Nebel A, Filon D, Brinkmann B, Majumder PP, Faerman M, Oppenheim A. "The Y chromosome pool of Jews as part of the genetic landscape of the Middle East." Am J Hum Genet. 2001 Nov;69(5):1095--112.
• 50: R v Doheny and Adams {1997} 1 Crim App R 369.

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  K. Computing Milieux
  K.4 COMPUTERS AND SOCIETY

General Terms:
Legal Aspects, Security

Keywords:
cold and hot hits, data protection, dna database, forensic genomics, human genome project, informational privacy, kin privacy