ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Privacy-preserving social network analysis for criminal investigations
Full text PdfPdf (285 KB)
Source
Conference on Computer and Communications Security archive
Proceedings of the 7th ACM workshop on Privacy in the electronic society table of contents
Alexandria, Virginia, USA
SESSION: Social networking and emerging social issues table of contents
Pages 9-14  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-1-60558-289-4
Authors
Florian Kerschbaum  SAP Research, Karlsruhe, Germany
Andreas Schaad  SAP Research, Karlsruhe, Germany
Sponsors
SIGSAC: ACM Special Interest Group on Security, Audit, and Control
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 24,   Downloads (12 Months): 242,   Citation Count: 1
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1456403.1456406
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Social network analysis (SNA) is now a commonly used tool in criminal investigations, but evidence gathering and analysis is often restricted by data privacy laws. We consider the case where multiple investigators want to collaborate, but do not yet have sufficient evidence that justifies a plaintext data exchange. This paper proposes a solution for privacy-preserving social network analysis where several investigators can collaborate without actually exchanging sensitive private information. An investigator can request data from other sites to augment his view without revealing personally identifiable data. The investigator can compute important metrics by means of a SNA on the subject while keeping the entire social network unknown him.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Directive 95--46-EC on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data. Available at http://ec.europa.eu/justice home/fsj/privacy, 1995.
 
2
IBM Entity Analytic Solutions. Available at http://ibm.com/db2/eas, 2005.
3
4
 
5
J. Brickell, and V. Shmatikov. Privacy-Preserving Graph Algorithms in the Semi-honest Model. Proceedings of AsiaCrypt, 2005.
 
6
R. Cramer, I. Damgard, and U. Maurer. General Secure Multi-party Computation from any Linear Secret-Sharing Scheme. Proceedings of EuroCrypt, 2000.
 
7
 
8
9
 
10
I. Damgard, M. Fitzi, E. Kiltz, J. Nielsen, and T. Toft. Unconditionally Secure Constant-Rounds Multi-party Computation for Equality, Comparison, Bits and Exponentiation. Proceedings of Theoretical Cryptography Conference, 2006.
 
11
 
12
13
 
14
15
 
16
O. Goldreich. Secure Multi-party Computation. Available at www.wisdom.weizmann.ac.il/?oded/pp.html, 2002.
17
 
18
W. Harper, and D. Harris. The application of link analysis to police intelligence. Human Factors 17(2), 1975.
 
19
L. Kissner, and D. Song. Privacy-Preserving Set Operations. Proceedings of CRYPTO, 2005.
 
20
P. Paillier. Public-Key Cryptosystems Based on Composite Degree Residuosity Classes. Proceedings of EUROCRYPT, 1999.
 
21
S. Pohlig, and M. Hellman. An improved algorithm for computing logarithms over GF(p) and its cryptographic significance. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 24, 1978.
 
22
 
23
M. Sparrow. The application of network analysis to criminal intelligence: an assessment of the prospects. Social Networks 13, 1991.
 
24
T. Toft. Primitives and Applications for Multi-party Computation. PhD dissertation, University of Aarhus, 2007.
 
25
T. Van Cangh, A. Boujraf. The Eurojust-Europol Case Study. Available at http://www.r4egov.eu/resources/details.php?Id taxonomy=6, 2007.
26
 
27


Collaborative Colleagues:
Florian Kerschbaum: colleagues
Andreas Schaad: colleagues