ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Enforcing a security pattern in stakeholder goal models
Full text PdfPdf (534 KB)
Source
Conference on Computer and Communications Security archive
Proceedings of the 4th ACM workshop on Quality of protection table of contents
Alexandria, Virginia, USA
SESSION: Security measurement table of contents
Pages 9-14  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-1-60558-321-1
Authors
Yijun Yu  The Open University, Milton Keynes, United Kngdm
Haruhiko Kaiya  Shinshu University, Nagano City, Japan
Hironori Washizaki  Waseda University, Tokyo, Japan
Yingfei Xiong  University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
Zhenjiang Hu  NII, Tokyo, Japan
Nobukazu Yoshioka  NII, Tokyo, Japan
Sponsors
SIGSAC: ACM Special Interest Group on Security, Audit, and Control
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 10,   Downloads (12 Months): 130,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1456362.1456366
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Patterns are useful knowledge about recurring problems and solutions. Detecting a security problem using patterns in requirements models may lead to its early solution. In order to facilitate early detection and resolution of security problems, in this paper, we formally describe a role-based access control (RBAC) as a pattern that may occur in stakeholder requirements models. We also implemented in our goal-oriented modeling tool the formally described pattern using model-driven queries and transformations. Applied to a number of requirements models published in literature, the tool automates the detection and resolution of the security pattern in several goal-oriented stakeholder requirements.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
E. B. Fernandez and R. Pan. A pattern language for security models. In Proc. of Conference on Pattern Languages of Programs (PLoP), 2001.
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
F. Massacci, M. Prest, and N. Zannone. Using a security requirements engineering methodology in practice: The compliance with the Italian data protection legislation. Computer Standards & Interfaces, 27(5):445--455, 2005.
 
12
Y. Asnar, P. Giorgini, F. Massacci, A. Saidane, R. Bonato, V. Meduri, and C. Riccucci. Secure and Dependable Patterns in Organizations: An Empirical Approach. In Proc. of RE, pages 287--292, 2007.
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
17
 
18
 
19
L. Liu, E. Yu, and J. Mylopoulos. Security Design Based on Social Modeling. pages 71--78, 2006.
 
20
 
21
 
22
Hugo Estrada et al. An empirical evaluation of the i* framework in a model-based software generation environment. In Proc. of CAiSE, pages 513--527, 2006.
 
23
Volha Bryl, Fabio Massacci, John Mylopoulos, and Nicola Zannone. Designing security requirements models through planning. In Proc. of CAiSE, 2006.
 
24
Haralambos Mouratidis, Jan Jurjens, and Jorge Fox. Towards a comprehensive framework for secure systems development. In Proc. of CAiSE, 2006.
 
25
 
26
Thongchai Rojkangsadan Kawin Supaporn, Nakornthip Prompoon. An Approach: Constructing the Grammar from Security Pattern. In Proc. of International Joint Conference on Computer Science and Software Engineering (JCSSE2007), 2007.
 
27
Ivan Araujo and Michael Weiss. Linking Patterns and Non-Functional Requirements. In Proc. of PLoP, 2002.
 
28
Xavier Franch Gemma Grau. A Goal-Oriented Approach for the Generation and Evaluation of Alternative Architectures. In Proc. of European Conference on Software Architecture (ECSA), 2007.
29

Collaborative Colleagues:
Yijun Yu: colleagues
Haruhiko Kaiya: colleagues
Hironori Washizaki: colleagues
Yingfei Xiong: colleagues
Zhenjiang Hu: colleagues
Nobukazu Yoshioka: colleagues