| Efficient security primitives derived from a secure aggregation algorithm |
| Full text |
Pdf
(940 KB)
|
Source
|
Conference on Computer and Communications Security
archive
Proceedings of the 15th ACM conference on Computer and communications security
table of contents
Alexandria, Virginia, USA
SESSION: Applied cryptography 2
table of contents
Pages 521-534
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-1-59593-810-7
|
|
Authors
|
|
Haowen Chan
|
Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
|
|
Adrian Perrig
|
Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
|
|
| Sponsors |
|
| Publisher |
|
| Bibliometrics |
Downloads (6 Weeks): 30, Downloads (12 Months): 334, Citation Count: 0
|
|
|
ABSTRACT
By functionally decomposing a specific algorithm (the hierarchical secure aggregation algorithm of Chan et al. [3] and Frikken et al. [7]), we uncover a useful general functionality which we use to generate various efficient network security primitives, including: a signature scheme ensuring authenticity, integrity and non-repudiation for arbitrary node-to-node communications; an efficient broadcast authentication algorithm not requiring time synchronization; a scheme for managing public keys in a sensor network without requiring any asymmetric cryptographic operations to verify the validity of public keys, and without requiring nodes to maintain node revocation lists. Each of these applications uses the same basic data aggregation primitive and thus have O(log n) congestion performance and require only that symmetric secret keys are shared between each node and the base station. We thus observe the fact that the optimizations developed in the application area of secure aggregation can feed back into creating more optimized versions of highly general, basic security functions.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
|
| |
2
|
|
 |
3
|
|
 |
4
|
|
| |
5
|
W. Du, J. Deng, Y. Han, and P. K. Varshney. A witness-based approach for data fusion assurance in wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference, 2003.
|
 |
6
|
|
 |
7
|
|
| |
8
|
G. Gaubatz, J. Kaps, and B. Sunar. Public keys cryptography in sensor networks -- revisited. In Proceedings of European Workshop on Security in Ad-Hoc and Sensor Networks (ESAS), 2004.
|
| |
9
|
Vipul Gupta , Matthew Millard , Stephen Fung , Yu Zhu , Nils Gura , Hans Eberle , Sheueling Chang Shantz, Sizzle: A Standards-Based End-to-End Security Architecture for the Embedded Internet (Best Paper), Proceedings of the Third IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications, p.247-256, March 08-12, 2005
[doi> 10.1109/PERCOM.2005.41]
|
| |
10
|
L. Hu and D. Evans. Secure aggregation for wireless networks. In Workshop on Security and Assurance in Ad hoc Networks, 2003.
|
| |
11
|
P. Jadia and A. Mathuria. Efficient secure aggregation in sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on High Performance Computing, 2004.
|
| |
12
|
|
 |
13
|
|
| |
14
|
|
 |
15
|
|
 |
16
|
|
| |
17
|
A. Mahimkar and T. Rappaport. SecureDAV: A secure data aggregation and verification protocol for sensor networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference, 2004.
|
| |
18
|
D. Malan, M. Welsh, and M. Smith. A public-key infrastructure for key distribution in TinyOS based on elliptic curve cryptography. In Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Sensor and Ad hoc Communications and Networks (SECON), Oct. 2004.
|
| |
19
|
M. Manulis and J. Schwenk. Provably secure framework for information aggregation in sensor networks. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Computational Science and Its Applications (ICCSA), Aug. 2007.
|
| |
20
|
|
 |
21
|
|
| |
22
|
|
 |
23
|
|
 |
24
|
|
 |
25
|
|
| |
26
|
S. Zhu, S. Setia, S. Jajodia, and P. Ning. An interleaved hop-by-hop authentication scheme for filtering false data in sensor networks. In Proceedings of IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, pages 259--271, May 2004.
|
|