ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
An approach for promoting contribution in GAF-based ad hoc networks: design and implementation
Full text PdfPdf (245 KB)
Source
International Workshop on Modeling Analysis and Simulation of Wireless and Mobile Systems archive
Proceedings of the 11th international symposium on Modeling, analysis and simulation of wireless and mobile systems table of contents
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
SESSION: Energy awareness table of contents
Pages 375-379  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-1-60558-235-1
Authors
Chalermek Intanagonwiwat  Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
Sutthipong Lertmanorat  Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGSIM: ACM Special Interest Group on Simulation and Modeling
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 8,   Downloads (12 Months): 33,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1454503.1454566
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

In wireless ad hoc networks, all nodes are routers that are required to forward packets for each other. Undoubtedly, nodes that forward more packets will run out of power before others will. To save energy, some nodes may become selfish and refuse to forward packets. As a result, the overall system performance will be degraded with the increased number of selfish nodes. This problem is more severe in networks that employ a wake-sleep schedule for energy savings (e.g., GAF-based networks). Even if a few of active nodes (leader nodes in GAF) are selfish, such a network may be virtually partitioned. Therefore, we propose two schemes to detect and to punish selfish nodes as well as to reduce the possibility of virtual network partition: SWD and GAFSWD. In SWD, only GAF-leader nodes are watchdogs. This watchdog concept is further developed into GAFSWD whereby non-leader nodes take turn to be additional watchdogs for detecting selfish nodes and to be candidates for alternative routes when needed. The results indicate that our schemes achieve significantly better fair ratio and delivery ratio while incurring small false conviction under investigated scenarios.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
K. Balakrishnan, J. Deng, and P.K. Varshney, "TWOACK: Preventing Selfishness in Mobile Ad Hoc Networks," in WCNC, New Orleans, LA, USA, 2005.
2
 
3
J.-P. Hubaux, J.-Y.L. Boudec, S. Giordano, and M. Hamdi, "The Terminode Project: Towards Mobile Ad-Hoc WANs," in MOMUC, San Diego, 1999.
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
B. Raghavan and A.C. Snoeren, "Priority Forwarding in Ad Hoc Networks with Self-Interested Parties," in P2PECON, 2003.
 
9
Y. Wang, V. Giruka, and M. Singhal, "A Fair Distributed Solution for Selfish Nodes Problem in Wireless Ad-Hoc Networks," in ADHOC-NOW, Vancouver, British Columbia, 2004, pp. 211--224.
 
10
Y. Xu, J. Heidemann, and D. Estrin, "Adaptive Energy-Conserving Routing for Multihop Ad Hoc Networks," Technical Report 527, USC/ISI, 2000.
11
 
12
S. Zhong, J. Chen, and Y.R. Yang, "Sprite: a simple, cheat-proof, credit-based system for mobile ad-hoc networks," in the 22th IEEE INFOCOM, 2003, pp. 1987 -- 1997.

Collaborative Colleagues:
Chalermek Intanagonwiwat: colleagues
Sutthipong Lertmanorat: colleagues