ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Uniform sensing protocol for autonomous rechargeable sensor networks
Full text PdfPdf (187 KB)
Source
International Workshop on Modeling Analysis and Simulation of Wireless and Mobile Systems archive
Proceedings of the 11th international symposium on Modeling, analysis and simulation of wireless and mobile systems table of contents
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
SESSION: Wireless sensor networks table of contents
Pages 92-99  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-1-60558-235-1
Authors
Volodymyr Pryyma  University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, USA
Ladislau Bölöni  University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, USA
Damla Turgut  University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, USA
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGSIM: ACM Special Interest Group on Simulation and Modeling
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 1,   Downloads (12 Months): 63,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1454503.1454523
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Autonomous rechargeable sensor networks are becoming a feasible solution to many real world applications. In this paper, we propose a Uniform Sensing Protocol for autonomous rechargeable sensor networks. Our protocol aims to provide uniformly distributed sensing throughout the entire life-time of the network, thus increasing the overall network reliability. It considers the amount of available energy in the environment as well as the probability of encountering a specific number of threats. Using these parameters, each node estimates its own active period, such that uniform sensing is established. We compare the performance of our protocol with static and dynamic active time slot approaches. The simulation results show that the Uniform Sensing Protocol generates fewer failures and has a significantly longer mean time to failure than the other two schemes.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
3
 
4
5
6
7
 
8
A. Kansal and M. B. Srivastava. Wireless sensor networks: A systems perspective, chapter 9. Artech House, April 2005.
 
9
 
10
C. Moser, D. Brunelli, L. Thiele, and L. Benini. Lazy scheduling for energy harvesting sensor nodes. In IFIP International Federation for Information Processing, volume 225, pages 125--134, 2006.
 
11
 
12
 
13
S. Olariu, A. Wadaa, L. Wilson, and M. Eltoweissy. Wireless sensor networks: leveraging the virtual infrastructure. In IEEE Network, pages 51--56, July-August 2004.
 
14
S. Olariu, Q. Xu, and A. Y. Zomaya. An energy-efficient self-organization protocol for wireless sensor networks. In ISSNIP '04: Proceedings of the Intelligent Sensors, Sensor Networks and Information Processing Conference, pages 55--60, December 2004.
 
15
16
 
17
 
18
H. Zafar and D. Corkill. Simplifying solar harvesting model-development in situated agents using pre-deployment learning and information sharing. In ATSN '08: Proceedings of 2nd International Workshop on Agent Technology for Sensor Networks, pages 41--48, May 2008.
19

Collaborative Colleagues:
Volodymyr Pryyma: colleagues
Ladislau Bölöni: colleagues
Damla Turgut: colleagues