|
ABSTRACT
Internet users often face the challenge of identifying the most suitable product out of some product assortment available on a certain e-sales platform. Recommender systems can substantially alleviate this typically complex task. Since the rise of such systems a lot of effort has been done in developing different recommendation approaches and algorithms, which all of them have certain strengths and weaknesses. What has been widely ignored by the recommender community so far are the potentials and impacts of psychological and decision theoretical phenomenons, which already have been investigated and applied in the field of marketing. Such phenomenons promise big capability to support users in decision making when facing a comparison situation. This paper concentrates on two classes of phenomenons, which are decoy effects and serial position effects. Tightly coupled to these phenomenons is the problem of getting the utility function of a recommender right, as this function serves both as the basis of result set calculation as well as the fundament of exploitation of above mentioned phenomenons. Putting all these aspects together an extended architecture for recommender systems will be proposed in the end of the paper.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
D. Ariely, T. Wallsten, Seeking subjective dominance in multidimensional space: An exploration of the asymmetric dominance effect, Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, 63(3), 223--232, 1995.
|
| |
2
|
A. D. Baddeley and G. Hitch. Recency re-examined. I S. Dornic (Ed.), Attentional and performance VI, pp. 647--667. Hillsdale. New York: Erlbaum, 1977.
|
| |
3
|
R. Burke, Knowledge-based Recommender Systems. Encyclopedia of Lib. and Information Syst., 69(32), 180--200, 2000.
|
| |
4
|
|
| |
5
|
|
| |
6
|
Alexander Felfernig , Bartosz Gula , Gerhard Leitner , Marco Maier , Rudolf Melcher , Erich Teppan, Persuasion in Knowledge-Based Recommendation, Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on Persuasive Technology, June 04-06, 2008, Oulu, Finland
[doi> 10.1007/978-3-540-68504-3_7]
|
 |
7
|
|
| |
8
|
|
| |
9
|
A. Felfernig, B. Gula, E. Teppan, Knowledge-based recommender technologies for marketing and sales, in International Journal of Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence (21), pp. 333--355, World Scientific Publishing, 2007.
|
| |
10
|
A. Felfernig, B. Gula, G. Leitner, R. Melcher, S. Strauß, E.Teppan, O. Vitouch, Reihenfolgeeffekte bei Produktattributen -Eine Pilotstudie zur Untersuchung von Reihenfolgeeffektenim Kontext von Recommender Systemen, Beiträge zur 49.Tagung experimentell arbeitender Psychologen, pp. 320, PapstScience Publishers, 2007.
|
| |
11
|
Alexander Felfernig , Bartosz Gula , Gerhard Leitner , Marco Maier , Rudolf Melcher , Erich Teppan, Persuasion in Knowledge-Based Recommendation, Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on Persuasive Technology, June 04-06, 2008, Oulu, Finland
[doi> 10.1007/978-3-540-68504-3_7]
|
| |
12
|
A. Felfernig, B. Gula, G. Leitner, M. Maier, R. Melcher, E.C. Teppan, A Dominance Model for the Calculation of Decoy Products in Recommendation Environments, Proceedings of the AISB conference, 2008.
|
| |
13
|
Felfernig A. and Kiener A. Knowledge-based InteractiveSelling of Financial Services using FSAdvisor. Proceedings of IAAI'05, pp. 1475--1482, 2005.
|
| |
14
|
F. B. Gershberg and A. P. Shimamura. Serial position effects in implicit and explicit tests of memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20: 1370--1378, 1994.
|
 |
15
|
|
 |
16
|
|
| |
17
|
E. Maylor. Serial position effects in semantic memory: reconstructing the order of verses of hymns. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9: 816--820, 2002.
|
| |
18
|
M. Papagelis,D. Plexousakis, T. Kutsuras, Alleviating the Sparsity Problem of Collaborative Filtering using Trust Interfaces, Trust Management, ISBN: 978-3-540-26042-4, Springer Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2005.
|
| |
19
|
|
| |
20
|
H. Pechtl, Definitions- und Wirkungsbereiche des decoy-Effekts eine empirisch-explorative Untersuchung, Nov. 2004, Diskussionspapier 10/04 ISSN 1437-6989.
|
| |
21
|
J. Reilly, K. McCarthy, L. McGinty, B. Smyth, Incremental Critiquing, Knowledge Based Systems, 18(2-3), 143--151, 2005.
|
| |
22
|
|
| |
23
|
I. Simonson, A. Tversky, Choice in context: Tradeoff contrast and extremeness aversion, in: Journal of Marketing Research (39), 281--292, 1992.
|
| |
24
|
|
| |
25
|
C. Tan, Y. Chan, X. Yang, H. Chan, H. Teo, Effects of Choice Contrast and Order Sequence on Consumer Judgement and Decision in Comparison-Shopping Assisted Environment, Third Annual Workshop on HCI Research in MIS, 2004.
|
| |
26
|
Winterfeldt D., Edwards W. Decision Analysis and Behavioral Research, Cambridge University Press,Cambridge, England, 1986.
|
|