ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Can people collaborate to improve the relevance of search results?
Full text PdfPdf (718 KB)
Source
ACM Conference On Recommender Systems archive
Proceedings of the 2008 ACM conference on Recommender systems table of contents
Lausanne, Switzerland
SESSION: Short papers table of contents
Pages 283-286  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-1-60558-093-7
Authors
Arun Kumar Agrahri  University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
Divya Anand Thattandi Manickam  Amrita School of Engineering, Coimbatore, India
John Riedl  University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGKDD: ACM Special Interest Group on Knowledge Discovery in Data
SIGART: ACM Special Interest Group on Artificial Intelligence
SIGWEB: ACM Special Interest Group on Hypertext, Hypermedia, and Web
SIGIR: ACM Special Interest Group on Information Retrieval
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 18,   Downloads (12 Months): 205,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1454008.1454052
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Search engines are among the most-used resources on the internet. However, even today's most successful search engines struggle to provide high quality search results. According to recent studies as many as 50 percent of web search sessions fail to find any relevant results for the searcher. Researchers have proposed social search techniques, in which early searchers provide feedback that is used to improve relevance for later searchers. In this paper we investigate foundational questions of social search. In particular, we directly assess the degree of agreement among users about the relevance ranking of search results. We developed a simulated search engine interface that systematically randomizes Google's normal relevance ordering of the items presented to users. Our results show that (a) people are biased toward items in the top of the search lists, even if the list is randomized; (b) people explicit feedback is not biased and (c) people's shared preferences do not always agree with Google's result order. These results suggest that social search techniques might improve the effectiveness of web search engines.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Pass, G., Chowdhury, A., Torgeson, C. 2006. Picture of Search. In Proceedings of InfoScale 2006
 
2
3
4
 
5
6
 
7
8
9
 
10
11
12

Collaborative Colleagues:
Arun Kumar Agrahri: colleagues
Divya Anand Thattandi Manickam: colleagues
John Riedl: colleagues