ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Personalized recommendation in social tagging systems using hierarchical clustering
Full text PdfPdf (570 KB)
Source
ACM Conference On Recommender Systems archive
Proceedings of the 2008 ACM conference on Recommender systems table of contents
Lausanne, Switzerland
POSTER SESSION: Posters table of contents
Pages 259-266  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-1-60558-093-7
Authors
Andriy Shepitsen  DePaul University, Chicago, IL, USA
Jonathan Gemmell  DePaul University, Chicago, IL, USA
Bamshad Mobasher  DePaul University, Chicago, IL, USA
Robin Burke  DePaul University, Chicago, IL, USA
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGKDD: ACM Special Interest Group on Knowledge Discovery in Data
SIGART: ACM Special Interest Group on Artificial Intelligence
SIGWEB: ACM Special Interest Group on Hypertext, Hypermedia, and Web
SIGIR: ACM Special Interest Group on Information Retrieval
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 74,   Downloads (12 Months): 527,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1454008.1454048
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Collaborative tagging applications allow Internet users to annotate resources with personalized tags. The complex network created by many annotations, often called a folksonomy, permits users the freedom to explore tags, resources or even other user's profiles unbound from a rigid predefined conceptual hierarchy. However, the freedom afforded users comes at a cost: an uncontrolled vocabulary can result in tag redundancy and ambiguity hindering navigation. Data mining techniques, such as clustering, provide a means to remedy these problems by identifying trends and reducing noise. Tag clusters can also be used as the basis for effective personalized recommendation assisting users in navigation. We present a personalization algorithm for recommendation in folksonomies which relies on hierarchical tag clusters. Our basic recommendation framework is independent of the clustering method, but we use a context-dependent variant of hierarchical agglomerative clustering which takes into account the user's current navigation context in cluster selection. We present extensive experimental results on two real world dataset. While the personalization algorithm is successful in both cases, our results suggest that folksonomies encompassing only one topic domain, rather than many topics, present an easier target for recommendation, perhaps because they are more focused and often less sparse. Furthermore, context dependent cluster selection, an integral step in our personalization algorithm, demonstrates more utility for recommendation in multi-topic folksonomies than in single-topic folksonomies. This observation suggests that topic selection is an important strategy for recommendation in multi-topic folksonomies.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
G. Begelman, P. Keller, and F. Smadja. Automated Tag Clustering: Improving search and exploration in the tag space. Proc. of the Collaborative Web Tagging Workshop at WWW, 6, 2006.
3
 
4
J. Gemmell, A. Shepitsen, B. Mobasher, and R. Burke. Personalization in Folksonomies Based on Tag Clustering. Intelligent Techniques for Web Personalization & Recommender Systems, 2008.
 
5
 
6
T. Hammond, T. Hannay, B. Lund, and J. Scott. Social Bookmarking Tools (I). D-Lib Magazine, 11(4):1082--9873, 2005.
 
7
C. Hayes and P. Avesani. Using tags and clustering to identify topic-relevant blogs. International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, March 2007.
 
8
P. Heymann and H. Garcia-Molina. Collaborative Creation of Communal Hierarchical Taxonomies in Social Tagging Systems. Technical report, Technical Report 2006-10, Computer Science Department, April 2006.
 
9
A. Hotho, R. Jaschke, C. Schmitz, and G. Stumme. Information retrieval in folksonomies: Search and ranking. The Semantic Web: Research and Applications, 4011:411--426, 2006.
 
10
A. Mathes. Folksonomies - Cooperative Classification and Communication Through Shared Metadata. Computer Mediated Communication, LIS590CMC (Doctoral Seminar), Graduate School of Library and Information Science, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, December, 2004.
 
11
12
 
13
 
14
15
 
16
 
17
E. Voorhees. The TREC-8 Question Answering Track Report. Proceedings of TREC, 8:77--82, 1999.
18
 
19
Z. Xu, Y. Fu, J. Mao, and D. Su. Towards the semantic web: Collaborative tag suggestions. Collaborative Web Tagging Workshop at WWW2006, Edinburgh, Scotland, May, 2006.
 
20
R. Yan, A. Natsev, and M. Campbell. An efficient manual image annotation approach based on tagging and browsing. 2007.

Collaborative Colleagues:
Andriy Shepitsen: colleagues
Jonathan Gemmell: colleagues
Bamshad Mobasher: colleagues
Robin Burke: colleagues