ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Automated creation of a forms-based database query interface
Full text PdfPdf (584 KB)
Source
Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment archive
Volume 1 ,  Issue 1  (August 2008) table of contents
SESSION: IR and forms table of contents
Pages 695-709  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISSN:2150-8097
Authors
Magesh Jayapandian  University of Michigan
H. V. Jagadish  University of Michigan
Publisher
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 23,   Downloads (12 Months): 134,   Citation Count: 1
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1453856.1453932
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Forms-based query interfaces are widely used to access databases today. The design of a forms-based interface is often a key step in the deployment of a database. Each form in such an interface is capable of expressing only a very limited range of queries. Ideally, the set of forms as a whole must be able to express all possible queries that any user may have. Creating an interface that approaches this ideal is surprisingly hard. In this paper, we seek to maximize the ability of a forms-based interface to support queries a user may ask, while bounding both the number of forms and the complexity of any one form. Given a database schema and content we present an automated technique to generate a good set of forms that meet the above desiderata. While a careful analysis of real or expected query workloads are useful in designing the interface, these query sets are often unavailable or hard to obtain prior to the database even being deployed. Hence generating a good set of forms just using the database itself is a challenging yet important problem. Our experimental analysis shows that our techniques can create a reasonable set of forms, one that can express 60--90% of user queries, without any input from the database administrator. Human experts, without support from software such as ours, are often unable to support as high a fraction of user queries.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Geoquery Database: http://www.cs.utexas.edu/users/ml/geo.html.
 
2
Jobsquery Database: http://www.cs.utexas.edu/users/ml/nldata/jobquery.html.
 
3
MiMI - Michigan Molecular Interaction Database: http://mimi.ctaalliance.org.
 
4
NCBI BLAST: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/blast/Blast.cgi.
 
5
XMark: An XML Benchmark Project: http://www.xml-benchmark.org/.
 
6
 
7
Francesca Benzi, Dario Maio, and Stefano Rizzi. VISIONARY: a Viewpoint-based Visual Language for Querying Relational Databases. Journal of Visual Languages and Computing, 10(2), 1999.
8
 
9
Mary Elaine Califf and Raymond J. Mooney. Relational Learning of Pattern-Match Rules for Information Extraction. In AAAI, 1999.
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
Harald Schöning. A Graphical Interface to a Complex-Object Database Management System. In IDS, 1992.
 
16
D. J. Helm and B. W. Thompson. An Approach for Totally Dynamic Forms Processing in Web-Based Applications. In ICEIS (2), 2001.
 
17
 
18
Magesh Jayapandian, Adriane Chapman, et al. Michigan Molecular Interactions (MiMI): Putting the Jigsaw Puzzle Together. Nucleic Acids Research (Database Issue), 35, 2007.
 
19
Sergey Melnik. Generic Model Management: Concepts and Algorithms. Chapter 7. PhD thesis, University of Leipzig, 2004.
20
21
22
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
29


Collaborative Colleagues:
Magesh Jayapandian: colleagues
H. V. Jagadish: colleagues