ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Resisting structural re-identification in anonymized social networks
Full text PdfPdf (1.45 MB)
Source
Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment archive
Volume 1 ,  Issue 1  (August 2008) table of contents
SESSION: Privacy and authentication table of contents
Pages 102-114  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISSN:2150-8097
Authors
Michael Hay  University of Massachusetts Amherst
Gerome Miklau  University of Massachusetts Amherst
David Jensen  University of Massachusetts Amherst
Don Towsley  University of Massachusetts Amherst
Philipp Weis  University of Massachusetts Amherst
Publisher
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 16,   Downloads (12 Months): 239,   Citation Count: 5
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1453856.1453873
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

We identify privacy risks associated with releasing network data sets and provide an algorithm that mitigates those risks. A network consists of entities connected by links representing relations such as friendship, communication, or shared activity. Maintaining privacy when publishing networked data is uniquely challenging because an individual's network context can be used to identify them even if other identifying information is removed. In this paper, we quantify the privacy risks associated with three classes of attacks on the privacy of individuals in networks, based on the knowledge used by the adversary. We show that the risks of these attacks vary greatly based on network structure and size. We propose a novel approach to anonymizing network data that models aggregate network structure and then allows samples to be drawn from that model. The approach guarantees anonymity for network entities while preserving the ability to estimate a wide variety of network measures with relatively little bias.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
R. Albert, H. Jeong, and A.-L. Barabasi. Error and attack tolerance of complex networks. Nature, 406:378, 2000.
 
3
4
 
5
A. Barabási and R. Albert. Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science, 286, 1999.
 
6
G. Bianconi and M. Marsili. Emergence of large cliques in random scale-free networks. Europhysics Letters, 74(4):740--746, 2006.
 
7
W. W. Cohen. Enron email dataset, 2005.
8
 
9
C. Dwork, F. McSherry, K. Nissim, and A. Smith. Calibrating noise to sensitivity in private data analysis. In TCC, 2006.
 
10
P. Erdős and A. Rényi. On the evolution of random graphs. Publ. Math. Inst. Hung. Acad. Sci, 5:17--61, 1960.
 
11
N. Friedkin. Horizons of observability and limits of informal control in organizations. Social Forces, 62(1):54--77, 1983.
12
 
13
J. Grochow and M. Kellis. Network motif discovery using subgraph enumeration and symmetry-breaking. In RECOMB, 2007.
 
14
M. Hay, G. Miklau, D. Jensen, P. Weis, and S. Srivastava. Anonymizing social networks. Technical Report 07--19, UMass Amherst, 2007.
 
15
N. Immerman and E. Lander. Describing graphs: A first-order approach to graph canonization. In Complexity Theory Retrospective. Springer-Verlag, 1990.
 
16
A. Korolova, R. Motwani, S. Nabar, and Y. Xu. Link privacy in social networks. In ICDE, 2008.
17
 
18
 
19
D. Martin, D. Kifer, A. Machanavajjhala, J. Gehrke, and J. Halpern. Worst-case background knowledge. ICDE, 2007.
 
20
M. E. J. Newman. The structure and function of complex networks. SIAM Review, 45(2):167--256, 2003.
 
21
J. J. Potterat, L. Phillips-Plummer, S. Q. Muth, R. B. Rothenberg, D. E. Woodhouse, T. S. Maldonado-Long, H. P. Zimmerman, and J. B. Muth. Risk network structure in the early epidemic phase of HIV transmission in Colorado Springs. Sexually Trans. Infections, 2002.
 
22
 
23
S. Russell and P. Norvig. AI: A Modern Approach. 2003.
 
24
 
25
 
26
D.-W. Wang, C.-J. Liau, and T.-S. Hsu. Privacy protection in social network data disclosure based on granular computing. In International Conference on Fuzzy Systems, 2006.
 
27
D. J. Watts and S. H. Strogatz. Collective dynamics of 'small-world' networks. Nature, 393:440--442, 1998.
 
28
D. B. West. Introduction to Graph Theory. August 2000.
 
29
X. Ying and X. Wu. Randomizing social networks: a spectrum preserving approach. In SIAM Conf. on Data Mining, 2007.
 
30
E. Zheleva and L. Getoor. Preserving the privacy of sensitive relationships in graph data. In PinKDD Workshop, 2007.
 
31
B. Zhou and J. Pei. Preserving privacy in social networks against neighborhood attacks. In ICDE, 2008.

CITED BY  7

Collaborative Colleagues:
Michael Hay: colleagues
Gerome Miklau: colleagues
David Jensen: colleagues
Don Towsley: colleagues
Philipp Weis: colleagues