ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
A questionnaire-based study on delayed reciprocity in a P2P-tv system
Full text PdfPdf (946 KB)
Source
ACM International Conference Proceeding Series; Vol. 291 archive
Proceeding of the 1st international conference on Designing interactive user experiences for TV and video table of contents
Silicon Valley, California, USA
SESSION: iTV design table of contents
Pages 151-154  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-1-60558-100-2
Authors
Jenneke E. Fokker  Delft University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands
Piet H. Westendorp  Delft University of Technology and Eindhoven University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands
Johan A. Pouwelse  Delft University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands
Huib de Ridder  Delft University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands
Sponsor
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 5,   Downloads (12 Months): 66,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1453805.1453836
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Using peer-to-peer (P2P) technology for distributing video files to many viewers simultaneously can only be successful if users cooperate voluntarily and massively. The current BitTorrent protocol enforces instantaneous bandwidth exchange within the context of one video file. To better exploit available resources for P2P-TV systems, such as our Tribler (www.tribler.org) software, we explore ways to induce user cooperation flexible over time and resources. The research is based on the social exchange theory and is done in two steps. First, the impact of social distance expressed in the degrees of separation (DoS) on the trust in reciprocity is investigated. Second, the DoS are combined with the kind of exchangeable resources typical for P2P-TV systems (i.e. injections and bandwidth) to find the influence of these variables on the accepted delay in reciprocity. The discussion will focus on the relation between trust in reciprocity and the accepted delay in reciprocity.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Clark, M. S. and Mills, J. The difference between communal and exchange relationships: What it is and is not. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19. 684--691.
 
2
Fokker, J., De Ridder, H., Westendorp, P. and Pouwelse, J. Psychological Backgrounds for Inducing Cooperation in Peer-to-Peer Television. Cesar, P., Chorianopoulos, K. and Jensen, J. F. eds. EuroITV'07, Springer Verlag, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2007, 136--145.
 
3
Gouldner, A. W. The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. American Sociological Review, 25. 161--178.
 
4
Hamilton, W. D. The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 7 (1). 1--16.
 
5
Homans, G. C. Social Behavior as Exchange. American Journal of Sociology, 63 (6). 597--606.
 
6
Milgram, S. The small world problem. Psychology Today, 1. 61--67.
 
7
Sahlins, M. in Stone Age Economics, Aldine, Chicago, 1972, 193--194.

Collaborative Colleagues:
Jenneke E. Fokker: colleagues
Piet H. Westendorp: colleagues
Johan A. Pouwelse: colleagues
Huib de Ridder: colleagues