ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Practical issues in subjective video quality evaluation: human factors vs. psychophysical image quality evaluation
Full text PdfPdf (192 KB)
Source
ACM International Conference Proceeding Series; Vol. 291 archive
Proceeding of the 1st international conference on Designing interactive user experiences for TV and video table of contents
Silicon Valley, California, USA
SESSION: TV viewer studies table of contents
Pages 1-4  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-1-60558-100-2
Authors
Marc Sullivan  AT&T Laboratories, Austin, TX, USA
James Pratt  AT&T Laboratories, Austin, TX, USA
Philip Kortum  Rice University, Houston, TX, USA
Sponsor
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 18,   Downloads (12 Months): 119,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1453805.1453807
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

In this paper, we describe subjective video quality testing using naturally occurring, realistic, video content. The use of realistic content poses a number of challenges that are not encountered when using standard video test clips. The methods that we have developed are targeted to define levels of video quality that will be acceptable to customers of a video service. The methods were developed in the context of home TV viewing, but are applicable to other emerging areas such as mobile video.

Some of the key elements of testing with natural content are controlling for natural content variability, measuring content desirability, and using a testing method that encourages natural viewing behaviors.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
ITU -T Rec. P.500-11, "Methodology for the subjective assessment of the quality of television pictures," International Telecommunications Union, Geneva, Switzerland, 1996
 
2
Kortum, P. and Sullivan, M. (2004) Content is King: The Effect of Content on the Perception of Video Quality. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
 
3
ITU- T Rec. P.800, "Methods for subjective determination of transmission quality," International Telecommunications Union, Geneva, Switzerland, 1996.
 
4
Celis, R. L. and Olson, J. C. (2006) The role of Involvement in Attention and Comprehension Processes. The Journal of Consumer Research 15(2) pp
 
5
Rohaly, , A. M., Corriveau, P. J., Libert, J. M., Webster, A. A., Baroncini, V., Beerends, J., Blin, J., Contin, L., Hamada, T., Harrison, D., Hekstra, A. P., Lubin, J., Nishida, Y.,Nishihara, R., Pearson, J. C., Pessoa, A. F., Pickford, N., Schertz, A., Visca, M., Watson, A. B., and Winkler, S. (2000). Video Quality Experts Group: current results and future directions Proc. SPIE Vol. 4067, Visual Communications and Image Processing 2000. p. 742--75

Collaborative Colleagues:
Marc Sullivan: colleagues
James Pratt: colleagues
Philip Kortum: colleagues