Personalization and choice behavior: the role of personality traits

ABSTRACT

Online merchants use personalization technologies to gain knowledge of an individual customer and then generate preference-matched web content for the customer. Among the various types of personalization technologies, this research focuses on personalization engines that generate preference-matched content based on a customer's prior transactions. Extant research in this area has focused on how to maximize knowledge mined from transaction logs to generate content that is highly similar to the customer's past revealed preferences. However, it remains an empirical question as to whether the content closely matched with previous transactions is most likely to influence choice behavior. In this study, we postulate that the content closely matched with previous transactions may not be the most influential in biasing a customer. In the consideration and choice process, an individual's personality traits play a pivotal role in moderating the effect of personalized content. Drawing on research in marketing, we examine three key personality traits: need for cognition; variety seeking, and need for uniqueness; and explore their effects on choice behavior in the context of transaction-driven personalization. Research hypotheses are tested with over 2,000 pre-selected subjects in an online experiment based on a ringtone download website. We find that individual personality traits moderate content consideration and choice. Theoretical and practical implications of the findings are discussed.

REFERENCES

• 1: Albert, T.C., Goes, P.B. and Gupta, A. (2004). "GIST: A Model for Design and Management of Content and Interactivity of Customer-Centric Websites," MIS Quarterly, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp. 161--182.
• 2: Elisabeth André , Thomas Rist, From adaptive hypertext to personalized web companions, Communications of the ACM, v.45 n.5, May 2002 [doi>10.1145/506218.506243]
• 3: Anonymous (2003). "Jupiter Research Reports That Website 'Personalization' Does Not Always Provide Positive Results", Retrieved May 1, 2005, from http://www.jupitermedia.com/corporate/releases/03.10.14-newjupresearch.html.
• 4: Liliana Ardissono , Anna Goy , Giovanna Petrone , Marino Segnan, Personalization in business-to-customer interaction, Communications of the ACM, v.45 n.5, May 2002 [doi>10.1145/506218.506245]
• 5: Areni, C.S., Ferrell, M.E. and Wilcox, J.B. (2000). "The Persuasive Impact of Reported Group Opinions on Individuals Low vs. High in Need for Cognition: Rationalization vs. Biased Elaboration?" Psychology and Marketing, Vol. 17, No. 10, pp. 855--875.
• 6: J. Yannis Bakos, A strategic analysis of electronic marketplaces, MIS Quarterly, v.15 n.3, p.295-310, Sept. 1991 [doi>10.2307/249641]
• 7: Ranieri Baraglia , Fabrizio Silvestri, Dynamic personalization of web sites without user intervention, Communications of the ACM, v.50 n.2, p.63-67, February 2007 [doi>10.1145/1216016.1216022]
• 8: Baumgartner, H. and Steenkamp, E.M. (1996). "Exploratory Consumer Buying Behavior: Conceptualization and Measurement," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Vol. 13, No. 2, pp. 121--137.
• 9: Benbasat, I. and Dexter, A.S. (1982). "Individual Differences in the Use of Decision Support Aids," Journal of Accounting Research, Vol. 20, No. 1, pp. 1--11.
• 10: Izak Benbasat , Robert W. Zmud, Empirical research in information systems: the practice of relevance, MIS Quarterly, v.23 n.1, p.3-16, March 1999 [doi>10.2307/249403]
• 11: Berlyne, D. E. Conflict, Arousal, and Curiosity, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY. 1960.
• 12: Daniel Billsus , Clifford A. Brunk , Craig Evans , Brian Gladish , Michael Pazzani, Adaptive interfaces for ubiquitous web access, Communications of the ACM, v.45 n.5, May 2002 [doi>10.1145/506218.506240]
• 13: Burns, A.T. and Stollak, M.J. (1998). "Development of a Web-Based Intelligent Agent for the Fashion Selection and Purchasing Process via Electronic Commerce," The Proceedings of Americas Conference on Information Systems, pp. 140--142.
• 14: Cacioppo, J.T. and Petty, R.E. (1982). "The Need for Cognition," Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 42, No. 1, pp. 116--131.
• 15: Cacioppo, J.T., Petty, R.E. and Kao, C.F. (1984). "The Efficient Assessment of Need for Cognition," Journal of Personality Assessment, Vol. 48, No. 3, pp. 306--307.
• 16: Roman Kapuscinski , Sridhar Tayur , Pradeep K. Chintagunta, Variety Seeking, Purchase Timing, and the "Lightning Bolt" Brand Choice Model, Management Science, v.45 n.4, p.486-498, April 1999 [doi>10.1287/mnsc.45.4.486]
• 17: Cohen, J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd Ed. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ. 1988.
• 18: Weiguo Fan , Michael D. Gordon , Praveen Pathak, Personalization of search engine services for effective retrieval and knowledge management, Proceedings of the twenty first international conference on Information systems, p.20-34, December 2000, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
• 19: Fan, H and M.S. Poole (2006). "What Is Personalization? Perspectives on the Design and Implementation of Personalization in Information Systems," Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, Vol. 16, No. 3/4, pp. 179--202
• 20: Fazlollahi, B., Parikh, M. and Vahidov, R. "Intelligent Guidance in Adaptive Decision Support Systems," The Proceedings of Americas Conference on Information Systems, August 16 - 18: Phoenix, Arizona. 1996.
• 21: Finn, A. and Louviere, J. (1990). "Shopping-Center Patronage Models: Fashioning A Consideration Set Segmentation Solution," Journal of Business Research, Vol. 21, No. 3, pp. 259--275.
• 22: Fletcher, G.J.O., Danilovis, P., Fernandez, G., Peterson, D. and Reeder, G.D., (1986). "Attributional Complexity: An Individual Difference Measure," Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 51, No. 4, pp. 875--884.
• 23: Gensch, D.H. (1987). "A Two-Stage Disaggregate Attribute Choice Model," Marketing Science, Vol. 7, No. 3, pp. 299--310.
• 24: Haugtvedt, C., Petty, R. and Cacioppo, R. (1992). "Need for Cognition and Advertising: Understanding the Role of Personality Variables in Consumer Behavior," Journal of Consumer Psychology, Vol. 1, No. 3, pp. 239--260.
• 25: Traci J. Hess , Mark A. Fuller , John Mathew, Involvement and Decision-Making Performance with a Decision Aid: The Influence of Social Multimedia, Gender, and Playfulness, Journal of Management Information Systems, v.22 n.3, p.15-54, Number 3/Winter 2005-6 [doi>10.2753/MIS0742-1222220302]
• 26: Homburg, C. and Giering, A. (2001). "Personal Characteristics as Moderators of the Relationship between Customer Satisfaction and Loyalty - An Empirical Analysis," Psychology and Marketing, Vol. 18, No. 1, pp. 43--66.
• 27: Howard, J.A. and Sheth, J.N. (1969). The theory of buyer behavior. New York, NY: Wiley.
• 28: Howard, J.A. (1989). Consumer behavior in marketing strategy. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
• 29: Hunt, R.G., Krzystofiak, F.J., Meindl, J.R. and Yousry, A.M. (1989). "Cognitive Style and Decision Making," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Making, Vol. 44, pp. 436--453.
• 30: Alfred Kobsa, Privacy-enhanced personalization, Communications of the ACM, v.50 n.8, p.24-33, August 2007 [doi>10.1145/1278201.1278202]
• 31: Larsen, V., Wright, N.D., Hergert, T.R. (2004). "Advertising Montage: Two Theoretical Perspectives," Psychology and Marketing, Vol. 21, No. 1, pp. 1--15.
• 32: Lehmann, D.R. and Pan, Y. (1994). "Context Effects, New Brand Entry, and Consideration Sets," Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 31, No. 3, pp. 364--374.
• 33: Marc Light , Mark T. Maybury, Personalized multimedia information access, Communications of the ACM, v.45 n.5, May 2002 [doi>10.1145/506218.506246]
• 34: Lu, H.P., Yu, H.J. and Lu, S.S.K. (2001). "The Effects of Cognitive Style and Model Type on DSS Acceptance: An Empirical Study," European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 131, No. 3, pp. 649--663.
• 35: Lynn, M. and Harris, J. (1997). "The Desire for Unique Consumer Products: A New Individual Differences Scale," Psychology and Marketing, Vol. 14, No. 6, pp. 601--616.
• 36: Udi Manber , Ash Patel , John Robison, Experience with personalization of Yahoo!, Communications of the ACM, v.43 n.8, p.35-39, Aug. 2000 [doi>10.1145/345124.345136]
• 37: Lorraine Mcginty , Barry Smyth, Adaptive Selection: An Analysis of Critiquing and Preference-Based Feedback in Conversational Recommender Systems, International Journal of Electronic Commerce, v.11 n.2, p.35-57, Number 2 / Winter 2006-7 [doi>10.2753/JEC1086-4415110202]
• 38: Mitra, A. (1995). "Advertising and Stability of Consideration Sets Over Multiple Purchase Occasions," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 81--94.
• 39: Bamshad Mobasher , Robert Cooley , Jaideep Srivastava, Automatic personalization based on Web usage mining, Communications of the ACM, v.43 n.8, p.142-151, Aug. 2000 [doi>10.1145/345124.345169]
• 40: Moon, Y. (2002). "Personalization and Personality: Some Effects of Customizing Message Style Based on Consumer Personality," Journal of Consumer Psychology, Vol. 12, No. 4, pp. 313--326.
• 41: McAlister, L. and Pessemier, E. (1982). "Variety Seeking Behavior: An Interdisciplinary Review," Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 9, No. 3, pp. 311--322.
• 42: Maurice D. Mulvenna , Sarabjot S. Anand , Alex G. Büchner, Personalization on the Net using Web mining: introduction, Communications of the ACM, v.43 n.8, p.122-125, Aug. 2000 [doi>10.1145/345124.345165]
• 43: Nail, P.R. (1986). "Toward an Integration of Some Models and Theories of Social Response," Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 100, No. 2, pp. 190--206.
• 44: Nutt, P.C. (1986). "Evaluating MIS Design Principles," MIS Quarterly, Vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 139--156.
• 45: Petty, R.E. and Cacioppo, J.T. (1986). Communication and Persuasion: Central and Peripheral Routes to Attitude Change, New York: Springer Verlag.
• 46: Punj, G. and Brookes, R. (2001). "Decision Constraints and Consideration Set Formation in Consumer Durables," Psychology and Marketing, Vol. 18, No. 8, pp. 843--863.
• 47: Michael K. Reiter , Aviel D. Rubin, Anonymous Web transactions with Crowds, Communications of the ACM, v.42 n.2, p.32-48, Feb. 1999 [doi>10.1145/293411.293778]
• 48: Roberts, J. (1989). "A Grounded Model of Consideration Set Size and Composition," Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 16, pp. 749--757.
• 49: Roberts, J. and Lattin, J.M. (1997). "Consideration: Review of Research and Prospects for Future Insights," Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 34, No. 3, pp. 406--410.
• 50: Roehm, M.L. and Sternthal, B., (2001). "The Moderating Effect of Knowledge and Resources on the Persuasive Impact of Analogies," Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp. 257--272.
• 51: Barry Smyth , Paul Cotter, A personalized television listings service, Communications of the ACM, v.43 n.8, p.107-111, Aug. 2000 [doi>10.1145/345124.345161]
• 52: Snyder, C. R. (1992). "Product Scarcity by Need for Uniqueness Interaction: A Consumer Catch-22 Carousel?" Basic and Applied Social Psychology, Vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 9--24.
• 53: Kar Yan Tam , Shuk Ying Ho, Web Personalization as a Persuasion Strategy: An Elaboration Likelihood Model Perspective, Information Systems Research, v.16 n.3, p.271-291, September 2005 [doi>10.1287/isre.1050.0058]
• 54: Tam, K.Y. and Ho, S.Y. (2006). "Understanding the Impact of Web Personalization on User Information Processing, Behavior and Judgment," MIS Quarterly, Vol. 30, No. 4, pp. 865--890.
• 55: Tang, E.P.Y. and Chin, I.O.K. (2007). "Analyzing Variety Seeking Behavior Using Panel Data," Journal of International Consumer Marketing, Vol. 19, No. 4, pp. 7--31.
• 56: Thompson, C.J. and Haytko, D.L. (1997). "Speaking of Fashion: Consumers' Uses of Fashion Discourses and the Appropriation of Countervailing Cultural Meanings," Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 24, No. 1, pp. 15--42.
• 57: Tian, K.T., Bearden, W.O. and Hunter, G.L., (2001). "Consumer's Need for Uniqueness: Scale Development and Validation," Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp. 50--66.
• 58: Tian, K.T. and McKenzie, K., (2001). "The Long-Term Predictive Validity of the Consumers' Need for Uniqueness Scale," Journal of Consumer Psychology, Vol. 10, No. 3, pp. 171--193.
• 59: Tormala, Z.L. and Petty, R.E. (2004). "Resistance to Persuasion and Attitude Certainty: The Moderating Role of Elaboration," Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 30, No. 11, pp. 1446--1457.
• 60: van Trijp, H. C. M., Hoyer, W. D. and Inman, J. J. (1996). "Why Switch? Product Category-Level Explanations for True Variety-Seeking Behaviour," Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 33, No. 3, pp. 281--292.
• 61: Verplanken, B. (1993). "Need for Cognition and External Information Search: Responses to Time Pressure during Decision-Making," Journal of Research in Personality, Vol. 27, pp. 238--252.
• 62: Vinaja, B.R., Raisinghani, M.S. and Slinkman, C., (2000). "Intelligent Agent Based Decision Making on the Internet: An Empirical Study," The Proceedings of Americas Conference on Information Systems, pp. 289--294.
• 63: Wheeler, S.C., Petty, R.E. and Bizer, G.Y. (2005). "Self-Schema Matching and Attitude Change: Situational and Dispositional Determinants of Message Elaboration," Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 31, No. 4, pp. 787--797.
• 64: Jie Zhang , Lakshman Krishnamurthi, Customizing Promotions in Online Stores, Marketing Science, v.23 n.4, p.561-578, Fall 2004 [doi>10.1287/mksc.1040.0055]
• 65: Zuckerman, M. (1979) Sensation Seeking: Beyond the Optimal Level of Arousal, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  C. Computer Systems Organization
  C.1 PROCESSOR ARCHITECTURES
      C.1.3 Other Architecture Styles

Additional Classification:
  H. Information Systems
  H.1 MODELS AND PRINCIPLES
      H.1.2 User/Machine Systems
  H.5 INFORMATION INTERFACES AND PRESENTATION (I.7)
      H.5.1 Multimedia Information Systems

Keywords:
choice behavior, need for cognition, need for uniqueness, personality traits, variety seeking, web personalization