ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Can developer-module networks predict failures?
Full text PdfPdf (413 KB)
Source Foundations of Software Engineering archive
Proceedings of the 16th ACM SIGSOFT International Symposium on Foundations of software engineering table of contents
Atlanta, Georgia
SESSION: Social structures table of contents
Pages 2-12  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-1-59593-995-1
Authors
Martin Pinzger  University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
Nachiappan Nagappan  Microsoft Research, Redmond
Brendan Murphy  Microsoft Research, Cambridge, UK
Sponsor
SIGSOFT: ACM Special Interest Group on Software Engineering
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 18,   Downloads (12 Months): 246,   Citation Count: 1
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1453101.1453105
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Software teams should follow a well defined goal and keep their work focused. Work fragmentation is bad for efficiency and quality. In this paper we empirically investigate the relationship between the fragmentation of developer contributions and the number of post-release failures. Our approach is to represent developer contributions with a developer-module network that we call contribution network. We use network centrality measures to measure the degree of fragmentation of developer contributions. Fragmentation is determined by the centrality of software modules in the contribution network. Our claim is that central software modules are more likely to be failure-prone than modules located in surrounding areas of the network. We analyze this hypothesis by exploring the network centrality of Microsoft Windows Vista binaries using several network centrality measures as well as linear and logistic regression analysis. In particular, we investigate which centrality measures are significant to predict the probability and number of post-release failures. Results of our experiments show that central modules are more failure-prone than modules located in surrounding areas of the network. Results further confirm that number of authors and number of commits are significant predictors for the probability of post-release failures. For predicting the number of post-release failures the closeness centrality measure is most significant.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
3
 
4
 
5
P. Bonacich. Power and Centrality: A family of Measures. American Journal of Sociology 92, pp. 1170--1182, 1987.
 
6
S. P. Borgatti, M. G. Everett, and L. C. Freeman. Ucinet for Windows: Software for Social Network Analysis. Analytic Technologies, Harvard, MA, 2002.
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
L. C. Freeman. Centrality in social networks: Conceptual clarification. Social Networks, 1(3), pp. 215--239, 1979.
 
14
R. A. Ghosh. Clustering and dependencies in free/open source software development: Methodology and tools. First Monday, 8(4), 2003.
 
15
 
16
D. M. Green and J. M. Swets. Signal detection theory and psychophysics. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. New York, 1966.
 
17
R. A. Hanneman and M. Riddle. Introduction to social network methods. University of California, Riverside, California, 2005.
 
18
 
19
J. Howison, K. Inoue, and K. Crowston. Social Dynamics of Free and Open Source Team Communication. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Open Source Software (OSS), pp. 319--330, 2006.
20
 
21
 
22
J. E. Jackson. A User's Guide to Principal Components. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 1991.
 
23
24
 
25
 
26
L. Lopez-Fernandez, G. Robles, and J. M. Gonzalez-Barahona. Applying Social Network Analysis to the Information in CVS Repositories. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Mining Software Repositories (MSR), pp. 101--105, 2004.
 
27
 
28
A. Mockus and D. M. Weiss: Predicting risk of software changes. Bell Labs Technical Journal, 5(2), pp. 169--180, 2000.
29
 
30
 
31
32
33
34
35
 
36
 
37
J. Ratzinger, M. Pinzger, and H. C. Gall. EQ-Mine: Predicting short-term defects for software evolution. In Proceedings of the Fundamental Approaches to Software Engineering (FASE), pp. 12--26, LNCS, Springer, 2007.
 
38
 
39
 
40
S. Wasserman and K. Faust. Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. Cambridge University Press, New York, 1994.
 
41
 
42
43


Collaborative Colleagues:
Martin Pinzger: colleagues
Nachiappan Nagappan: colleagues
Brendan Murphy: colleagues