ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Towards a meaningful MRA of traffic matrices
Full text PdfPdf (381 KB)
Source
Internet Measurement Conference archive
Proceedings of the 8th ACM SIGCOMM conference on Internet measurement table of contents
Vouliagmeni, Greece
SESSION: Routing and network topology table of contents
Pages 331-336  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-1-60558-334-1
Authors
David Rincón  Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain
Matthew Roughan  University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
Walter Willinger  AT&T Labs - Research, Florham Park, NJ, USA
Sponsors
SIGCOMM: ACM Special Interest Group on Data Communication
SIGMETRICS: ACM Special Interest Group on Measurement and Evaluation
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 70,   Downloads (12 Months): 305,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1452520.1452559
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Most research on traffic matrices (TM) has focused on finding models that help with inference, but not with other important tasks such as synthesis of TMs, traffic prediction, or anomaly detection. In this paper we approach the problem of a general model for traffic matrices, and argue that such a model must be sparse, i.e., have a small number of parameters in comparison to the size of the TM. A Multi-Resolution Analysis (MRA) of TMs can provide such a sparse representation. The Diffusion Wavelet (DW) transform is a good choice as a MRA tool here, because it inherently adapts to the structure of the underlying network. The paper describes our construction of the two-dimensional version of the DW transform and shows how to use it for our proposed MRA of TMs. The results obtained with operational networks confirm the sparseness of the DW-based TM analysis approach and its applicability to other TM-related tasks.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
D. L. Alderson, H. Chang, M. Roughan, S. Uhlig, and W. Willinger. The many facets of Internet topology and traffic. Networks and Heterogeneous Media, 1(4):569--600, December 2006.
 
2
J. Cao, D. Davis, S. V. Wiel, and B. Yu. Time-varying network tomography. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 95(452):1063--1075, 2000.
 
3
F. Chung. Spectral Graph Theory (CBMS Regional Conference Series in Mathematics, No. 92). American Mathematical Society, February 1997.
4
 
5
R. R. Coifman and M. Maggioni. Diffusion Wavelets. Applied and Computational Harmonic Analysis, 21(1):53--94, July 2006.
 
6
M. Crovella and E. Kolaczyk. Graph wavelets for spatial traffic analysis. In Proceedings of IEEE Infocom, pages 1848--1857, Apr. 2003.
 
7
J. C. Doyle, D. Alderson, L. Li, S. H. Low, M. Roughan, S. Shalunov, R. Tanaka, and W. Willinger. The "robust yet fragile" nature of the Internet. In Procs. of the Natl. Academy of Sciences, volume 102(40), pages 14123--14475, Oct. 2005.
 
8
 
9
B. Fortz, J. Rexford, and M. Thorup. Traffic engineering with traditional IP routing protocols. IEEE Comm. Magazine, 40(10):118--124, Oct. 2002.
10
11
 
12
 
13
S. Mallat. A Wavelet Tour of Signal Processing. Academic Press, 1999.
14
15
 
16
M. Roughan, A. Greenberg, C. Kalmanek, M. Rumsewicz, J. Yates, and Y. Zhang. Experience in measuring Internet backbone traffic variability: Models, metrics, measurements and meaning. In Procs. of ITC-18, pages 379--388, Berlin, Germany, 2003.
17
18
 
19
Y. Vardi. Network tomography: estimating source-destination traffic intensities from link data. J. of the Am. Statistical Association, 91:365--377, 1996.
20
21

Collaborative Colleagues:
David Rincón: colleagues
Matthew Roughan: colleagues
Walter Willinger: colleagues