ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Analysis of a mixed-use urban wifi network: when metropolitan becomes neapolitan
Full text PdfPdf (1.69 MB)
Source
Internet Measurement Conference archive
Proceedings of the 8th ACM SIGCOMM conference on Internet measurement table of contents
Vouliagmeni, Greece
SESSION: Wireless table of contents
Pages 85-98  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-1-60558-334-1
Authors
Mikhail Afanasyev  UC San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
Tsuwei Chen  Google, Inc., Mountain View, CA, USA
Geoffrey M. Voelker  UC San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
Alex C. Snoeren  UC San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
Sponsors
SIGCOMM: ACM Special Interest Group on Data Communication
SIGMETRICS: ACM Special Interest Group on Measurement and Evaluation
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 58,   Downloads (12 Months): 487,   Citation Count: 2
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1452520.1452531
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

While WiFi was initially designed as a local-area access network, mesh networking technologies have led to increasingly expansive deployments of WiFi networks. In urban environments, the WiFi mesh frequently supplements a number of existing access technologies, including wired broadband networks, 3G cellular, and commercial WiFi hotspots. It is an open question what role city-wide WiFi deployments play in the increasingly diverse access network spectrum. We study the usage of the Google WiFi network deployed in Mountain View, California, and find that usage naturally falls into three classes, based almost entirely on client device type. Moreover, each of these classes of use has significant geographic locality, following the distribution of residential, commercial, and transportation areas of the city. Finally, we find a diverse set of mobility patterns that map well to the archetypal use cases for traditional access technologies.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
M. Allman, K. Christensen, B. Nordman, and V. Paxson. Enabling an energy-efficient future internet. In Proceedings of HotNets, Nov. 2007.
3
4
5
6
7
 
8
J. Camp, V. Mancuso, O. Gurewitz, and E. Knightly. A measurement study of multiplicative overhead effects in wireless networks. In Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM, Apr. 2008.
9
10
11
12
 
13
F. Hernández-Campos and M. Papadopouli. A Comparative Measurement Study of the Workload of Wireless Access Points in Campus Networks. In Proceedings of IEEE PIMRC, Sept. 2005.
 
14
15
16
 
17
C. R. Livingston. Radius accounting. RFC 2866, IETF, June 2000.
18
19
 
20
K. N. Ramachandran, E. M. Belding-Royer, and K. C. Almeroth. DAMON: A Distributed Architecture for Monitoring Multi-hop Mobile Networks. In Proceedings of IEEE SECON, Oct. 2004.
21
 
22
B. Raman and K. Chebrolu. Experiences in using WiFi for rural internet in India. IEEE Communications Magazine, Special Issue on New Directions In Networking Technologies In Emerging Economies, 45(1):104--110, Jan. 2007.
23
24
 
25
D. Schwab and R. Bunt. Characterising the Use of a Campus Wireless Network. In Proceedings of IEEE Infocom, 2004.
26
27
 
28
 
29
S. Thajchayapong and J. M. Peha. Mobility Patterns in Microcellular Wireless Networks. In Proceedings of IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking, Mar. 2003.


Collaborative Colleagues:
Mikhail Afanasyev: colleagues
Tsuwei Chen: colleagues
Geoffrey M. Voelker: colleagues
Alex C. Snoeren: colleagues