ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Thinning akamai
Full text PdfPdf (505 KB)
Source
Internet Measurement Conference archive
Proceedings of the 8th ACM SIGCOMM conference on Internet measurement table of contents
Vouliagmeni, Greece
SESSION: Peer to peer and content distribution networks table of contents
Pages 29-42  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-1-60558-334-1
Authors
Ao-Jan Su  Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA
Aleksandar Kuzmanovic  Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA
Sponsors
SIGCOMM: ACM Special Interest Group on Data Communication
SIGMETRICS: ACM Special Interest Group on Measurement and Evaluation
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 66,   Downloads (12 Months): 588,   Citation Count: 2
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1452520.1452525
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Global-scale Content Distribution Networks (CDNs), such as Akamai, distribute thousands of servers worldwide providing a highly reliable service to their customers. Not only has reliability been one of the main design goals for such systems - they are engineered to operate under severe and constantly changing number of server failures occurring at all times. Consequently, in addition to being resilient to component or network outages, CDNs are inherently considered resilient to denial-of-service (DoS) attacks as well.

In this paper, we focus on Akamai's (audio and video) streaming service and demonstrate that the current system design is highly vulnerable to intentional service degradations. We show that (i) the discrepancy among streaming flows' lifetimes and DNS redirection timescales, (ii) the lack of isolation among customers and services, (e.g., video on demand vs. live streaming), (iii) a highly transparent system design, (iv) a strong bias in the stream popularity, and (v) minimal clients' tolerance for low-quality viewing experiences, are all factors that make intentional service degradations highly feasible. We demonstrate that it is possible to impact arbitrary customers' streams in arbitrary network regions: not only by targeting appropriate points at the streaming network's edge, but by effectively provoking resource bottlenecks at a much higher level in Akamai's multicast hierarchy. We provide countermeasures to help avoid such vulnerabilities and discuss how lessons learned from this research could be applied to improve DoS-resiliency of large-scale distributed and networked systems in general.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
 
3
Akamai. http://www.akamai.com.
 
4
End System Multicast. http://esm.cs.cmu.edu/.
 
5
Joost. http://www.joost.com/.
 
6
MiMMS. http://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/mimms.
 
7
Rinera Networks. http://www.rinera.com/.
 
8
URL Snooper. http://www.donationcoder.com/Software/Mouser/urlsnooper/index.html.
 
9
YouTube. http://www.youtube.com/.
 
10
Zattoo. http://zattoo.com/.
 
11
Akamai Technologies. Akamai Media Delivery. http://www.akamai.com/html/solutions/media_delivery.html.
 
12
Akamai Technologies. How ""Akamaization" "Works, 2000. http://www.akamai.com/html/about/press/releases/2000/press_061300.html.
 
13
Akamai Technologies. Akamai study uncovers critical link between video quality and audience retention, revenue opportunities, 2007. http://www.akamai.com/html/about/press/releases/2007/press_080707.html.
14
15
 
16
Cisco Systems, Inc. Configuring server load balancing. http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios122/122cgcr/fipr_c/ipcprt1/1cfsflb.htm.
 
17
Cisco Systems, Inc. How does load balancing work? http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/105/46.html.
 
18
 
19
Ellacoya Networks. Web traffic overtakes peer-to-peer (p2p) as largest percentage of bandwidth on the network, June 2007. http://www.ellacoya.com/news/pdf/2007/NXTcommEllacoyaMediaAlert.pdf.
20
 
21
 
22
L. Kontothanassis, R. Sitaraman, J. Wein, D. Hong, R. Kleinberg, B. Mancuso, D. Shaw, and D. Stodolsky. A Transport Layer for Live Streaming in a Content Delivery Network. Proceedings of the IEEE, 92(9):1408--1419, 2004.
23
 
24
J. Liu, S. G. Rao, B. Li, and H. Zhang. Opportunities and Challenges of Peer-to-Peer Internet Video Broadcast. In Proceedings of the IEEE Special Issue on Recent Advances in Distributed Multimedia Communications, 2007.
 
25
26
27
 
28
 
29
Y. Zhang, Z. Mao, and J. Wang. Low-rate tcp-targeted dos attack disrupts internet routing. In Proceedings of ISOC NDSS '07, San Diego, CA, Feb. 2007.


Collaborative Colleagues:
Ao-Jan Su: colleagues
Aleksandar Kuzmanovic: colleagues