ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Identifying video spammers in online social networks
Full text PdfPdf (9.56 MB)
Source AIRWeb; Vol. 295 archive
Proceedings of the 4th international workshop on Adversarial information retrieval on the web table of contents
Beijing, China
SESSION: Social networks table of contents
Pages 45-52  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-1-60558-159-0
Authors
Fabricio Benevenuto  Federal University of Minas Gerais, Brazil
Tiago Rodrigues  Federal University of Minas Gerais, Brazil
Virgilio Almeida  Federal University of Minas Gerais, Brazil
Jussara Almeida  Federal University of Minas Gerais, Brazil
Chao Zhang  Polytechnic University, Brooklyn, NY
Keith Ross  Polytechnic University, Brooklyn, NY
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 19,   Downloads (12 Months): 119,   Citation Count: 4
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1451983.1451996
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

In many video social networks, including YouTube, users are permitted to post video responses to other users' videos. Such a response can be legitimate or can be a video response spam, which is a video response whose content is not related to the topic being discussed. Malicious users may post video response spam for several reasons, including increase the popularity of a video, marketing advertisements, distribute pornography, or simply pollute the system.

In this paper we consider the problem of detecting video spammers. We first construct a large test collection of YouTube users, and manually classify them as either legitimate users or spammers. We then devise a number of attributes of video users and their social behavior which could potentially be used to detect spammers. Employing these attributes, we apply machine learning to provide a heuristic for classifying an arbitrary video as either legitimate or spam. The machine learning algorithm is trained with our test collection. We then show that our approach succeeds at detecting much of the spam while only falsely classifying a small percentage of the legitimate videos as spam. Our results highlight the most important attributes for video response spam detection.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Alexa. http://www.alexa.com.
 
2
 
3
 
4
5
6
 
7
 
8
9
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
R. Jain. The Art of Computer Systems Performance Analysis: Techniques for Experimental Design, Measurement, Simulation, and Modeling. John Wiley and Sons, INC, 1991.
16
17
18
 
19
A. Thomason. Blog spam: A review. In Proc. of Conf. on Email and Anti-Spam (CEAS), 2007.
 
20
 
21
 
22
C. Wu, K. Cheng, Q. Zhu, and Y. Wu. Using visual features for anti-spam filtering. In Proc. of IEEE Int'l Conf. on Image Processing (ICIP), 2005.
 
23
24


Collaborative Colleagues:
Fabricio Benevenuto: colleagues
Tiago Rodrigues: colleagues
Virgilio Almeida: colleagues
Jussara Almeida: colleagues
Chao Zhang: colleagues
Keith Ross: colleagues