|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ABSTRACT
Williams College has been working with audience response systems or "clickers" for three years. Initial experiments with the clickers had mixed results in both performance and faculty enthusiasm for the technology. In the last two years, Williams moved from an infrared system to a radio system that was more portable. After some favorable demos, key faculty tried the technology in their classes. Clicker use spread and is now used in classes as small as 10 students and as large as 180 students. The primary functionality of the system is to collect and present live data collected in the classroom. In its simplest form, faculty could use the system to review student comprehension of content. At Williams though, faculty have used the system in a variety of interesting ways. The system has been used for psychology research, peer instruction, student presentation feedback, and in class discussion. The process of adapting audience response systems to the classroom and the support of faculty using these systems has evolved over time. While some challenges remain, this technology has changed the way some faculty teach at Williams College. REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
INDEX TERMS
Primary Classification:
General Terms:
Keywords:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||