ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Success and failure of audience response systems in the classroom
Full text PdfPdf (213 KB)
Source
User Services Conference archive
Proceedings of the 36th annual ACM SIGUCCS conference on User services conference table of contents
Portland, OR, USA
SESSION: Track D (Monday, 10:30 am) table of contents
Pages 33-38  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISBN:978-1-60558-074-6
Author
Trevor Murphy  Williams College, Williamstown, MA, USA
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGUCCS: ACM Special Interest Group on University and College Computing Services
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 16,   Downloads (12 Months): 116,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1449956.1449969
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Williams College has been working with audience response systems or "clickers" for three years. Initial experiments with the clickers had mixed results in both performance and faculty enthusiasm for the technology. In the last two years, Williams moved from an infrared system to a radio system that was more portable. After some favorable demos, key faculty tried the technology in their classes. Clicker use spread and is now used in classes as small as 10 students and as large as 180 students.

The primary functionality of the system is to collect and present live data collected in the classroom. In its simplest form, faculty could use the system to review student comprehension of content. At Williams though, faculty have used the system in a variety of interesting ways. The system has been used for psychology research, peer instruction, student presentation feedback, and in class discussion.

The process of adapting audience response systems to the classroom and the support of faculty using these systems has evolved over time. While some challenges remain, this technology has changed the way some faculty teach at Williams College.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Bruff, Derek. (2008) Classroom Response System ("Clickers") Bibliography. Website. http://www.vanderbilt.edu/cft/resources/teaching_resources/technology/crs_biblio.htm
 
2
Crouch, C. H., & Mazur, E. (2001). Peer instruction: Ten years of experience and results. American Journal of Physics, 69(9), 970--977. Website. http://web.mit.edu/jbelcher/www/TEALref/Crouch_Mazur.pdf
 
3
eInstruction, Website. http://www.educue.com/.
 
4
Journal of Chemical Education, Website. http://www.jce.divched.org/JCEDLib/QBank/collection/ConcepTests/
 
5
North East Regional Computing Program (NERCOMP) Website. http://www.nercomp.org/events/event_single.aspx?id=40
 
6
Swoap, Steven.(2007) Polling Students in Class with the Clickers. PowerPoint presentation, Williams College. November 2, 2007.
 
7
Turning Technologies, Website. http://www.turningtechnologies.com/.