Attribute gates

ABSTRACT

Attribute gates are a new user interface element designed to address the problem of concurrently setting attributes and moving objects between territories on a digital tabletop. Motivated by the notion of task levels in activity theory, and crossing interfaces, attribute gates allow users to operationalize multiple subtasks in one smooth movement. We present two configurations of attribute gates; (1) grid gates which spatially distribute attribute values in a regular grid, and require users to draw trajectories through the attributes; (2) polar gates which distribute attribute values on segments of concentric rings, and require users to align segments when setting attribute combinations. The layout of both configurations was optimised based on targeting and steering laws derived from Fitts' Law. A study compared the use of attribute gates with traditional contextual menus. Users of attribute gates demonstrated both increased performance and higher mutual awareness.

REFERENCES

• 1: Johnny Accot , Shumin Zhai, Beyond Fitts' law: models for trajectory-based HCI tasks, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, p.295-302, March 22-27, 1997, Atlanta, Georgia, United States [doi>10.1145/258549.258760]
• 2: Johnny Accot , Shumin Zhai, Scale effects in steering law tasks, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, p.1-8, March 2001, Seattle, Washington, United States [doi>10.1145/365024.365027]
• 3: Johnny Accot , Shumin Zhai, More than dotting the i's --- foundations for crossing-based interfaces, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems: Changing our world, changing ourselves, April 20-25, 2002, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA [doi>10.1145/503376.503390]
• 4: Georg Apitz , François Guimbretière, CrossY: a crossing-based drawing application, Proceedings of the 17th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology, October 24-27, 2004, Santa Fe, NM, USA [doi>10.1145/1029632.1029635]
• 5: William A. S. Buxton, Chunking and phrasing and the design of human-computer dialogues, Human-computer interaction: toward the year 2000, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco, CA, 1995
• 6: Morgan Dixon , François Guimbretière , Nicholas Chen, Optimal parameters for efficient crossing-based dialog boxes, Proceeding of the twenty-sixth annual SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, April 05-10, 2008, Florence, Italy [doi>10.1145/1357054.1357307]
• 7: Drury, C. G. Movements with lateral constraint. Ergonomics, 14(2), 1971. p. 293--305.
• 8: Fitts, P. M. The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. Journal of Experimental Psychology 47. 1954. p 381--391.
• 9: François Guimbretiére , Terry Winograd, FlowMenu: combining command, text, and data entry, Proceedings of the 13th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology, p.213-216, November 06-08, 2000, San Diego, California, United States [doi>10.1145/354401.354778]
• 10: Don Hopkins, The design and implementation of pie menus, Dr. Dobb's Journal, v.16 n.12, p.16-26, Dec. 1991
• 11: Victor Kaptelinin, Activity theory: implications for human-computer interaction, Context and consciousness: activity theory and human-computer interaction, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, 1995
• 12: Gordon Paul Kurtenbach, The design and evaluation of marking menus, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont., Canada, 1993
• 13: Kari Kuutti, Activity theory as a potential framework for human-computer interaction research, Context and consciousness: activity theory and human-computer interaction, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, 1995
• 14: Russell Kruger , Sheelagh Carpendale , Stacey D. Scott , Saul Greenberg, Roles of Orientation in Tabletop Collaboration: Comprehension, Coordination and Communication, Computer Supported Cooperative Work, v.13 n.5-6, p.501-537, December 2004 [doi>10.1007/s10606-004-5062-8]
• 15: Russell Kruger , Sheelagh Carpendale , Stacey D. Scott , Anthony Tang, Fluid integration of rotation and translation, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, April 02-07, 2005, Portland, Oregon, USA [doi>10.1145/1054972.1055055]
• 16: Meredith June Morris , Terry Winograd, Supporting effective interaction with tabletop groupware, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 2006
• 17: Stuart Pook , Eric Lecolinet , Guy Vaysseix , Emmanuel Barillot, Control menus: excecution and control in a single interactor, CHI '00 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems, April 01-06, 2000, The Hague, The Netherlands [doi>10.1145/633292.633446]
• 18: Meredith Ringel , Kathy Ryall , Chia Shen , Clifton Forlines , Frederic Vernier, Release, relocate, reorient, resize: fluid techniques for document sharing on multi-user interactive tables, CHI '04 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems, April 24-29, 2004, Vienna, Austria [doi>10.1145/985921.986085]
• 19: Scott, S. D. Territory-Based Interaction Techniques for Tabletop Collaboration. Conference Companion of the ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. UIST 2003.
• 20: Shen, C., Everitt, K., and Ryall, K. UbiTable: Impromptu Face-to-Face Collaboration on Horizontal Interactive Surfaces. TR-2003-49, Mitsubishi Electric Research laboratories (2003).
• 21: Vernier, F, Lesh, N., Shen, C. Visualization Techniques for Circular Tabletop Interfaces. Proc. AVI 2002, 257--263.
• 22: Terry Winograd , François Guimbretière, Visual instruments for an interactive mural, CHI '99 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems, May 15-20, 1999, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania [doi>10.1145/632716.632861]

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  H. Information Systems
  H.5 INFORMATION INTERFACES AND PRESENTATION (I.7)
      H.5.2 User Interfaces (D.2.2, H.1.2, I.3.6)
          Subjects: Interaction styles (e.g., commands, menus, forms, direct manipulation)

General Terms:
Design

Keywords:
crossing interfaces, digital tabletops, large interactive displays, pen-based input, tabletop territories, user interface components