Kinematic templates: end-user tools for content-relative cursor manipulations

ABSTRACT

This paper introduces kinematic templates, an end-user tool for defining content-specific motor space manipulations in the context of editing 2D visual compositions. As an example, a user can choose the "sandpaper" template to define areas within a drawing where cursor movement should slow down. Our current implementation provides templates that amplify or dampen the cursor's speed, attenuate jitter in a user's movement, guide movement along paths, and add forces to the cursor. Multiple kinematic templates can be defined within a document, with overlapping templates resulting in a form of function composition. A template's strength can also be varied, enabling one to improve one's strokes without losing the human element. Since kinematic templates guide movements, rather than strictly prescribe them, they constitute a visual composition aid that lies between unaided freehand drawing and rigid drawing aids such as snapping guides, masks, and perfect geometric primitives.

REFERENCES

• 1: David Ahlström, Modeling and improving selection in cascading pull-down menus using Fitts' law, the steering law and force fields, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, April 02-07, 2005, Portland, Oregon, USA [doi>10.1145/1054972.1054982]
• 2: James Arvo , Kevin Novins, Fluid sketches: continuous recognition and morphing of simple hand-drawn shapes, Proceedings of the 13th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology, p.73-80, November 06-08, 2000, San Diego, California, United States [doi>10.1145/354401.354413]
• 3: Ravin Balakrishnan, "Beating" Fitts' law: virtual enhancements for pointing facilitation, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, v.61 n.6, p.857-874, December 2004 [doi>10.1016/j.ijhcs.2004.09.002]
• 4: Patrick Baudisch , Edward Cutrell , Ken Hinckley , Adam Eversole, Snap-and-go: helping users align objects without the modality of traditional snapping, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, April 02-07, 2005, Portland, Oregon, USA [doi>10.1145/1054972.1055014]
• 5: Eric A. Bier, Snap-dragging in three dimensions, Proceedings of the 1990 symposium on Interactive 3D graphics, p.193-204, February 1990, Snowbird, Utah, United States
• 6: Eric A. Bier , Maureen C. Stone, Snap-dragging, Proceedings of the 13th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques, p.233-240, August 1986
• 7: Eric A. Bier , Maureen C. Stone , Ken Pier , William Buxton , Tony D. DeRose, Toolglass and magic lenses: the see-through interface, Proceedings of the 20th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques, p.73-80, August 02-06, 0093, Anaheim, CA [doi>10.1145/166117.166126]
• 8: Renaud Blanch , Yves Guiard , Michel Beaudouin-Lafon, Semantic pointing: improving target acquisition with control-display ratio adaptation, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, p.519-526, April 24-29, 2004, Vienna, Austria [doi>10.1145/985692.985758]
• 9: Cockburn, A., Firth, A., 2003. Improving the acquisition of small targets. Proceedings of the British HCI Conference, pp. 181--196.
• 10: Yves Guiard , Renaud Blanch , Michel Beaudouin-Lafon, Object pointing: a complement to bitmap pointing in GUIs, Proceedings of Graphics Interface 2004, p.9-16, May 17-19, 2004, London, Ontario, Canada
• 11: Juan Pablo Hourcade, Learning from preschool children's pointing sub-movements, Proceedings of the 2006 conference on Interaction design and children, June 07-09, 2006, Tampere, Finland [doi>10.1145/1139073.1139093]
• 12: Amy Hurst , Jennifer Mankoff , Anind K. Dey , Scott E. Hudson, Dirty desktops: using a patina of magnetic mouse dust to make common interactor targets easier to select, Proceedings of the 20th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology, October 07-10, 2007, Newport, Rhode Island, USA [doi>10.1145/1294211.1294242]
• 13: Illustrator, 2008. Adobe. http://www.adobe.com/illustrator
• 14: Edward W. Ishak , Steven K. Feiner, Content-aware scrolling, Proceedings of the 19th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology, October 15-18, 2006, Montreux, Switzerland [doi>10.1145/1166253.1166277]
• 15: Gordon Kurtenbach , George Fitzmaurice , Thomas Baudel , Bill Buxton, The design of a GUI paradigm based on tablets, two-hands, and transparency, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, p.35-42, March 22-27, 1997, Atlanta, Georgia, United States [doi>10.1145/258549.258574]
• 16: Anatole Lécuyer , Jean-Marie Burkhardt , Laurent Etienne, Feeling bumps and holes without a haptic interface: the perception of pseudo-haptic textures, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, p.239-246, April 24-29, 2004, Vienna, Austria [doi>10.1145/985692.985723]
• 17: MacKenzie, I. S. and Riddersma, S. Effects of output display and control-display gain on human performance in interactive systems. Behaviour & Information Tech., 13:328--337, 1994.
• 18: Toshiyuki Masui, HyperSnapping, Proceedings of the IEEE 2001 Symposia on Human Centric Computing Languages and Environments (HCC'01), p.188, September 05-07, 2001
• 19: Meyer, D. E., Abrams, R. A., Komblum, S., Wright, C. E. & Smith, J. E. K. (1988). Optimality in human motor performance: ideal control of rapid aimed movements, Psychological Review, 95, 340--370.
• 20: Office, 2007. Microsoft. http://www.microsoft.com/office
• 21: Photoshop, 2008. Adobe. http://www.adobe.com/photoshop
• 22: Karan Singh, Interactive curve design using digital French curves, Proceedings of the 1999 symposium on Interactive 3D graphics, p.23-30, April 26-29, 1999, Atlanta, Georgia, United States [doi>10.1145/300523.300525]
• 23: Ir. Mfa Koert van Mensvoort, What you see is what you feel: exploiting the dominance of the visual over the haptic domain to simulate force-feedback with cursor displacements, Proceedings of the 4th conference on Designing interactive systems: processes, practices, methods, and techniques, June 25-28, 2002, London, England [doi>10.1145/778712.778761]
• 24: van Mensvoort, I. M. PowerCursor, 2008. http://www.powercursor.com
• 25: Visio, 2008. Microsoft. http://www.microsoft.com/visio
• 26: Walker, N., Meyer, D. E & Smelter, J. B. Spatial and temporal characteristics of rapid cursor-positioning movements with electromechanical mice in human computer interaction. Human Factors, 35(3), 1993, 431--458.
• 27: Watanabe, K, Yasumura, M. 2003. Realizable User Interface: The information realization by using cursor. http://www.persistent.org/VisualHapticsWeb.html
• 28: Aileen Worden , Nef Walker , Krishna Bharat , Scott Hudson, Making computers easier for older adults to use: area cursors and sticky icons, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, p.266-271, March 22-27, 1997, Atlanta, Georgia, United States [doi>10.1145/258549.258724]
• 29: Richard Zanibbi , Kevin Novins , James Arvo , Katherine Zanibbi, Aiding manipulation of handwritten mathematical expressions through style-preserving morphs, No description on Graphics interface 2001, p.127-134, June 07-09, 2001, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  H. Information Systems
  H.5 INFORMATION INTERFACES AND PRESENTATION (I.7)
      H.5.2 User Interfaces (D.2.2, H.1.2, I.3.6)
          Subjects: Graphical user interfaces (GUI)

General Terms:
Design, Human Factors

Keywords:
control/display ratio, drawing, motor space manipulation, relative pointing device, sketching, soft constraints