ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Reliability and scaling issues in multicast communication
Full text PdfPdf (1.28 MB)
Source Applications, Technologies, Architectures, and Protocols for Computer Communication archive
Conference proceedings on Communications architectures & protocols table of contents
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Pages: 188 - 198  
Year of Publication: 1992
ISBN:0-89791-525-9
Also published in ...
Author
Sponsor
SIGCOMM: ACM Special Interest Group on Data Communication
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 15,   Downloads (12 Months): 41,   Citation Count: 5
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/144179.144275
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

The efficiency with which multicast communication can take place is largely determined by the network level support available for such communication. Two factors contribute to the complexity of supporting current multicast applications: the lack of reliable multicast transport mechanisms at the network level and the lack of network support for large scale multicast communication. In this paper, we examine the issues pertinent to eliminating these shortcomings. We first show that internet multicasting algorithms based on reverse path forwarding are inherently unreliable and present a source-tree-based reliable multicasting scheme. The new scheme makes use of simple inter-gateway protocols and works on top of previously developed distance vector and link state internet routing schemes. Next, to support large scale applications, we present a scheme for partial multicasting and introduce a new network level operation, called gather. The partial multicasting mechanism allows messages to be delivered to subsets of multicast destinations, while the gather operation aids gateways in selectively suppressing redundant messages, thus reducing the message complexity. Using simulations, we investigate the efficacy of our schemes in supporting a sample application based on multicast communication.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
2
 
3
E. J. Berglund and D. Cheriton, "Amaze: A Multiplayer Computer Game," IEEE Software 2, No. 3(May, 1985).
4
5
6
 
7
D. R. Cheriton and C. L. Williamson, "VMTP as the Transport Layer for High-Performance Distributed Systems,'' IEEE Communications Magazine, pp. 37-44 (June, 1989).
 
8
R. Cooper and K. P. Birman, "Supporting Large Scale Applications on Networks of Workstations," Proc. 2nd Workshop on Workstation Operating Systems, pp. 25-28 IEEE Computer Society Press, (Sept, 1989).
9
10
 
11
12
13
 
14
B.J. Dempsey, W. T. Strayer, and A. C. Weaver, "Issues in Providing a Reliable Multicast Facility," Technical Report, Research Institute for Computing and Information Systems, Clear Lake, (July, I990).
15
 
16
Protocol Engines Inc., XTP Protocol Definition Revision 3.4. July, 1989.
 
17
 
18
N. Komada, K. Kera, and T. Kubo, "An Autonomous Decentralized Control System for Factory Automation," IEEE Computer 17 (12)pp. 73-83 (December, 1984).
 
19
J.M. McQuillan, I. Richer, and E. C. Rosen, "The new routing algorithm for the ARPANET," IEEE Trans. Communications COM-28 pp. 711-719 (May 1980).
 
20
P.M. Merlin and A. Segall, "A Failsafe Distributed Routing Protocol," 1EEE Trans. Communications COM- 27, No. 9 pp. 1280-1287 (September, 1979).
 
21
J. Moy, "OSPF Version 2," Request for Comments.' RFC 1247, (July, 1991 ).
 
22
B. Rajagopalan and P. K. Mckinley, "A Token-Based Protocol for Reliable, Ordered Multicast Communication,'' Proc. IEEE 8th Reliable Dist. Systems. Symposium, pp. 84-93 (October, 1989).
 
23
B. Rajagopalan and M. Faiman, "A Responsive Distributed Algorithm for Shortest Path Routing within Autonomous Systems," J. of lnternetworking 2, No. 1 pp. 51-69 (March, 1991).
 
24
 
25
S. Ramakrishnan and B. Jain, "A Negative Acknowledgement with Periodic Polling Protocol for Multicast over LANs," IEEE INFOCOM '87, (April, 1987).
 
26
A. Segall and B. Awerbuch, "A Reliable Broadcast Protocol," IEEE Trans. Communications 31(7)pp. 896-901 (July, 1983).
 
27
A. Spector, "Distributed Transaction Processing and the Camelot System," Distributed Operating Systems: Theory and Practice, Springer Verlag, (1987).
 
28
D.W. Wall, "Mechanisms for Broadcast and Selective Broadcast," Technical Report No. 190, Dept. of EE and CS, Stanford University, (June, 1980).
 
29