ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Supporting real-time applications in an Integrated Services Packet Network: architecture and mechanism
Full text PdfPdf (1.75 MB)
Source Applications, Technologies, Architectures, and Protocols for Computer Communication archive
Conference proceedings on Communications architectures & protocols table of contents
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Pages: 14 - 26  
Year of Publication: 1992
ISBN:0-89791-525-9
Also published in ...
Authors
Sponsor
SIGCOMM: ACM Special Interest Group on Data Communication
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 55,   Downloads (12 Months): 205,   Citation Count: 148
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/144179.144199
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

This paper considers the support of real-time applications in an Integrated Services Packet Network (ISPN). We first review the characteristics of real-time applications. We observe that, contrary to the popular view that real-time applications necessarily require a fixed delay bound, some real-time applications are more flexible and can adapt to current network conditions. We then propose an ISPN architecture that supports two distinct kinds of real-time service: guaranteed service, which is the traditional form of real-time service discussed in most of the literature and involves pre-computed worst-case delay bounds, and predicted service which uses the measure performance of the network in computing delay bounds. We then propose a packet scheduling mechanism that can support both of these real-time services as well as accommodate datagram traffic. We also discuss two other aspects of an overall ISPN architecture: the service interface and the admission control criteria.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
R. Chipalkatti, J. Kurose, and D. Towsley. Schedulin9 Policies/or Real-Time and Non-Real. Time Traffic in a Statistical Multiplewer, In Proceedings of GlobeCom '89, pp 774-783, 1989.
 
2
S. Casner private communication, 1992.
3
4
 
5
J. DeTreville and D. Sincoskie. A Distributed Experimental Communications System, In IEEE $SAC, Vol. 1, No. 6, pp 1070-1075, December 1983.
 
6
D. Ferrari. Distributed Delay Jitter Control in Packet- Switching Internetworks, preprint, 1991.
 
7
D. Ferrari and D. Verma. A Scheme for Real-Time Channel Establishment in Wide-Area Networks, In IEEE JSAC, Vol. 8, No. 4, pp 368-379, April 1990.
8
 
9
S. J. Golestani. Duration-Limited Statistical Multiplexing o/Delay Sensitive Traffic in Packet Networks, In Proceedings of INFOCOM '91, 1991.
 
10
 
11
R. Gu~rin, H. Ahmadi, and M. Naghshineh. Equivalent Capacity and Its Application to Bandwidth Allocation in High-Speed Networks, In iEEE JSAC, Vol. 9, No. 9, pp 968-981, September 1991.
12
 
13
J. Hyman, A. Lazar, and G. Pacifici. Real-Time Scheduling with Quality of Service Constraints, In IEEE JSAC, Vol. 9, No. 9, pp 1052-1063, September 1991.
 
14
V. Jacobson and S. Floyd private communication, 1991.
 
15
V. Jacobson private communication, 1991.
 
16
C. Kalmanek, H. Kanakia, and S. Keshav. Rate Controlled Servers for Very High-Speed Networks, In Proceedings of GlobeCom '90, pp 300.3.1-300.3.9, 1990.
17
 
18
S. Lu and P. R. Kumar. Distributed Scheduling Based on Due Dates and Buffer Priorities, In IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 36, pp 1406-1416, 1991.
 
19
A. Parekh and R. Gallager. A Generalized Processor Sharing Approach to Flow Control- The Single Node Case, In Technical Report LIDS-TR-2040, Laboratory for Information and Decision Systems, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1991.
 
20
A. Parekh. A Generalized Processor Sharing Approach to Flow Control in Integrated Services Networks, In Technical Report LIDS-TR-2089, Laboratory for Information and Decision Systems, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1992.
 
21
H. Schulzrinne, J. Kurose, and D. Towsley. Congestion Control .for Real-Time Traffic, In Proceedings of INFOCOM '90.
 
22
D. Verma, H. Zhang, and D. Ferrari. Delay Jitter Control /or Real-Time Communication in a Packet Switching Network, In Proceedings of TriCom '91, pp 35-43, 1991.
 
23
C. Weinstein and J. Forgie. Experience with Speech Communication in Packet Networks, In IEEE JSAC, Vol. 1, No. 6, pp 963-980, December 1983.
24
 
25
L. Zhang. A New Architecture/or Packet Switching Network Protocols, In Technical Report LCS-TR-455, Laboratory for Computer Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1989.
26
 
27
L. Zhang. A Comparison of Traffic Control Algorithms for High-Speed Networks, In 2rid Annual Workshop on Very High Speed Networks, 1991.

CITED BY  148

Collaborative Colleagues:
David D. Clark: colleagues
Scott Shenker: colleagues
Lixia Zhang: colleagues