|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ABSTRACT
Rank-width was defined by Oum and Seymour [2006] to investigate clique-width. They constructed an algorithm that either outputs a rank-decomposition of width at most f(k) for some function f or confirms that rank-width is larger than k in time O(|V|9log |V|) for an input graph G = (V,E) and a fixed k. We develop three separate algorithms of this kind with faster running time. We construct an O(|V|4)-time algorithm with f(k) = 3k + 1 by constructing a subroutine for the previous algorithm; we avoid generic algorithms minimizing submodular functions used by Oum and Seymour. Another one is an O(|V|3)-time algorithm with f(k) = 24k, achieved by giving a reduction from graphs to binary matroids; then we use an approximation algorithm for matroid branch-width by Hliněný [2005]. Finally we construct an O(|V|3)-time algorithm with f(k) = 3k − 1 by combining the ideas of the two previously cited papers. REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
INDEX TERMS
Primary Classification:
General Terms:
Keywords:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||