ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Combinatorial dominance guarantees for problems with infeasible solutions
Full text PdfPdf (389 KB)
Source
ACM Transactions on Algorithms (TALG) archive
Volume 5 ,  Issue 1  (November 2008) table of contents
Article No. 8  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISSN:1549-6325
Authors
Daniel Berend  Ben-Gurion University, Beer Sheva, Israel
Steven S. Skiena  Stony Brook University, NY
Yochai Twitto  Ben-Gurion University, Beer Sheva, Israel
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 4,   Downloads (12 Months): 109,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1435375.1435383
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

The design and analysis of approximation algorithms for NP-hard problems is perhaps the most active research area in the theory of combinatorial algorithms. In this article, we study the notion of a combinatorial dominance guarantee as a way for assessing the performance of a given approximation algorithm. An f(n) dominance bound is a guarantee that the heuristic always returns a solution not worse than at least f(n) solutions. We give tight analysis of many heuristics, and establish novel and interesting dominance guarantees even for certain inapproximable problems and heuristic search algorithms. For example, we show that the maximal matching heuristic of VERTEX COVER offers a combinatorial dominance guarantee of 2n − (1.839 + o(1))n. We also give inapproximability results for most of the problems we discuss.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
Berend, D., Skiena, S., and Twitto, Y. 2006. Dominance certificates for combinatorial optimization problems. submitted.
 
5
Deineko, V., and Woeginger, G. 2000. A study of exponential neighborhoods for the traveling salesman problem and the quadratic assignment problem. Math. Prog., Ser. A 87, 519--542.
 
6
Glover, F., and Punnen, A. 1997. The travelling salesman problem: New solvable cases and linkages with the development of new approximation algorithms. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 48, 502--510.
 
7
 
8
Gutin, G., and Yeo, A. 2001. TSP tour domination and hamilton cycle decompositions of regular digraphs. Oper. Res. Lett. 28, 3, 107--111.
 
9
 
10
Gutin, G., Yeo, A., and Zverovich, A. 2002a. Exponential neighborhoods and domination analysis for the TSP. In The Traveling Salesman Problem and its Variations, G. Gutin and A. Punnen, Eds. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, Chapter 6, 223--256.
 
11
Gutin, G., Yeo, A., and Zverovich, A. 2002b. Traveling salesman should not be greedy: Domination analysis of greedy-type heuristics for the TSP. Disc. Appl. Math. 117, 1--3, 81--86.
 
12
13
 
14
 
15
Phan, V., Skiena, S., and Sumazin, P. 2003. A model for analyzing black-box optimization. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 2748. Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 424--438.
 
16
Punnen, A., Margot, F., and Kabadi, S. 2001. TSP heuristics: Domination analysis and complexity. Res. rep. 2001-06, Dept. of Mathematics, Univ. Kentucky, Mar.
 
17
Rublineckii, V. 1973. Estimates of the accuracy of procedures in the traveling salesman problem. Num. Math. Comput. Tech. (in Russian) 4, 18--23.
 
18
Sarvanov, V., and Doroshko, N. 1981a. The approximate solution of the traveling salesman problem by a local algorithm that searches neighborhoods of exponential cardinality in quadratic time. Softw.: Algor. Prog. (in Russian) 31, 8--11.
 
19
Sarvanov, V., and Doroshko, N. 1981b. The approximate solution of the traveling salesman problem by a local algorithm that searches neighborhoods of factorial cardinality in cubic time. Soft.: Algor. Prog. (in Russian) 31, 11--13.
 
20
Sperner, E. 1928. Ein satzber untermegen einer endlichen menge. Math. Zeitschr. 27, 285--286.
 
21
Valient, L. 1979. The complexity of computing the permanent. Theoret. Comput. Sci. 8, 189--201.
 
22
Zemel, E. 1981. Measuring the quality of approximate solutions to zero-one programming problems. Math. Oper. Res. 6, 319--332.

Collaborative Colleagues:
Daniel Berend: colleagues
Steven S. Skiena: colleagues
Yochai Twitto: colleagues