|
ABSTRACT
Usability specialists were better than non-specialists at performing heuristic evaluation, and “double experts” with specific expertise in the kind of interface being evaluated performed even better. Major usability problems have a higher probability than minor problems of being found in a heuristic evaluation, but more minor problems are found in absolute numbers. Usability heuristics relating to exits and user errors were more difficult to apply than the rest, and additional measures should be taken to find problems relating to these heuristics. Usability problems that relate to missing interface elements that ought to be introduced were more difficult to find by heuristic evaluation in interfaces implemented as paper prototypes but were as easy as other problems to find in running systems.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
|
 |
2
|
|
| |
3
|
|
 |
4
|
|
| |
5
|
Engelbeck, G., and Roberts, T.L. The effect of several voicemenu characteristics on menu selection performance. Behaviour & Information Technology in press.
|
| |
6
|
Gould, J.D., and Boles, S.J. Speech filingmAn office system for principals. IBM Systems Journal 23, I (1984), 65-81.
|
 |
7
|
|
 |
8
|
Robin Jeffries , James R. Miller , Cathleen Wharton , Kathy Uyeda, User interface evaluation in the real world: a comparison of four techniques, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems: Reaching through technology, p.119-124, April 27-May 02, 1991, New Orleans, Louisiana, United States
[doi> 10.1145/108844.108862]
|
 |
9
|
Claire-Marie Karat , Robert Campbell , Tarra Fiegel, Comparison of empirical testing and walkthrough methods in user interface evaluation, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, p.397-404, May 03-07, 1992, Monterey, California, United States
[doi> 10.1145/142750.142873]
|
| |
10
|
|
 |
11
|
Clayton Lewis , Peter G. Polson , Cathleen Wharton , John Rieman, Testing a walkthrough methodology for theory-based design of walk-up-and-use interfaces, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems: Empowering people, p.235-242, April 01-05, 1990, Seattle, Washington, United States
[doi> 10.1145/97243.97279]
|
 |
12
|
|
| |
13
|
|
| |
14
|
|
| |
15
|
Nielsen, J. Applying heuristic evaluation to a highly domainspecific interface. Manuscript submitted for publication.
|
| |
16
|
|
 |
17
|
|
 |
18
|
|
 |
19
|
Cathleen Wharton , Janice Bradford , Robin Jeffries , Marita Franzke, Applying cognitive walkthroughs to more complex user interfaces: experiences, issues, and recommendations, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, p.381-388, May 03-07, 1992, Monterey, California, United States
[doi> 10.1145/142750.142864]
|
CITED BY 68
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jakob Nielsen , Rita M. Bush , Tom Dayton , Nancy E. Mond , Michael J. Muller , Robert W. Root, Teaching experienced developers to design graphical user interfaces, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, p.557-564, May 03-07, 1992, Monterey, California, United States
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jürgen Koenemann-Belliveau , John M. Carroll , Mary Beth Rosson , Mark K. Singley, Comparative usability evaluation: critical incidents and critical threads, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems: celebrating interdependence, p.245-251, April 24-28, 1994, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
|
|
|
C. Dennis Allen , Don Ballman , Vivienne Begg , Harold H. Miller-Jacobs , Michael Muller , Jakob Nielsen , Jared Spool, User involvement in the design process: why, when & how?, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, p.251-254, April 24-29, 1993, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
|
|
|
Claire-Marie Karat , Robert Campbell , Tarra Fiegel, Comparison of empirical testing and walkthrough methods in user interface evaluation, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, p.397-404, May 03-07, 1992, Monterey, California, United States
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Niels Ebbe Jacobsen , Morten Hertzum , Bonnie E. John, The evaluator effect in usability tests, CHI 98 conference summary on Human factors in computing systems, p.255-256, April 18-23, 1998, Los Angeles, California, United States
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cathleen Wharton , Janice Bradford , Robin Jeffries , Marita Franzke, Applying cognitive walkthroughs to more complex user interfaces: experiences, issues, and recommendations, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, p.381-388, May 03-07, 1992, Monterey, California, United States
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jakob Nielsen , Victoria L. Phillips, Estimating the relative usability of two interfaces: heuristic, formal, and empirical methods compared, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, p.214-221, April 24-29, 1993, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
|
|
|
|
|
|
John Rieman , Clayton Lewis , Richard M. Young , Peter G. Polson, Why is a raven like a writing desk?: lessons in interface consistency and analogical reasoning from two cognitive architectures, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems: celebrating interdependence, p.438-444, April 24-28, 1994, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
|
|
|
Richard Gong , David Kieras, A validation of the GOMS model methodology in the development of a specialized, commercial software application, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems: celebrating interdependence, p.351-357, April 24-28, 1994, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gilbert Cockton , Darryn Lavery , Alan Woolrych, Inspection-based evaluations, The human-computer interaction handbook: fundamentals, evolving technologies and emerging applications, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Mahwah, NJ, 2002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robert Mack , Jakob Nielsen, Usability inspection methods: report on a workshop held at CHI'92, Monterey, CA, May 3–4, 1992, ACM SIGCHI Bulletin, v.25 n.1, p.28-33, Jan. 1993
|
|
|
Thomas Költringer , Martin Tomitsch , Karin Kappel , Daniel Kalbeck , Thomas Grechenig, Implications for designing the user experience of DVD menus, CHI '05 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems, April 02-07, 2005, Portland, OR, USA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nina Khalayli , Silja Nyhus , Kari Hamnes , Tone Terum, Persona based rapid usability kick-off, CHI '07 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems, April 28-May 03, 2007, San Jose, CA, USA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Renan G. Cattelan , Cesar Teixeira , Rudinei Goularte , Maria Da Graça C. Pimentel, Watch-and-comment as a paradigm toward ubiquitous interactive video editing, ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications, and Applications (TOMCCAP), v.4 n.4, p.1-24, October 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Anders Bruun , Peter Gull , Lene Hofmeister , Jan Stage, Let your users do the testing: a comparison of three remote asynchronous usability testing methods, Proceedings of the 27th international conference on Human factors in computing systems, April 04-09, 2009, Boston, MA, USA
|
INDEX TERMS
Primary Classification:
H.
Information Systems
H.5
INFORMATION INTERFACES AND PRESENTATION (I.7)
H.5.2
User Interfaces (D.2.2, H.1.2, I.3.6)
Subjects:
Evaluation/methodology
Additional Classification:
H.
Information Systems
H.5
INFORMATION INTERFACES AND PRESENTATION (I.7)
H.5.2
User Interfaces (D.2.2, H.1.2, I.3.6)
Subjects:
Interaction styles (e.g., commands, menus, forms, direct manipulation);
Input devices and strategies (e.g., mouse, touchscreen)
General Terms:
Design,
Performance
Keywords:
discount usability engineering,
heuristic evaluation,
interface evaluation,
telephone-operated interfaces,
usability expertise,
usability problems
|