ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Browser-Soar: a computational model of a highly interactive task
Full text PdfPdf (843 KB)
Source Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems archive
Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems table of contents
Monterey, California, United States
Pages: 165 - 172  
Year of Publication: 1992
ISBN:0-89791-513-5
Authors
Sponsor
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 7,   Downloads (12 Months): 27,   Citation Count: 19
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/142750.142782
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Browser-Soar models the perceptual, cognitive, and motor operators of a user searching for information in an on-line help browser. The model accounts for 90% of the browsing behavior observed in ten episodes. This result suggests that much of browsing behavior is a routine cognitive task, describably by GOMS, and extends the boundary of tasks to which GOMS applies to include highly interactive tasks. Further, it also suggests that GOMS analyses can be used to evaluate text-editors and other computer applications, and to help focus design effort.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
Gray, W.D., John, B.E., and Atwood, M.E. Project Ernestine: Validating GOMS for predicting and explaining real-world task performance. Human- Computer Interaction. In preparation.
3
 
4
John, B.E., Vera, A.H., and Newell, A. Towards Real-Time Gores. Carnegie Mellon University, School of Computer Science Technical Report. CMU-CS-90-195, 1990.
 
5
John, B.E. and Newell, A. Toward an engineering model of stimulus-response compatibility. In Stimulus-Response Compatibility: An Integrated Perspective, R. W. Proctor and T. G. Reeve, eds. North-Holland, New York, NY, 1989.
 
6
 
7
 
8
Olson, J.R. and Olson, G.M. The growth of cognitive modeling in human computer interaction since GOMS. Human Computer Interaction, 5, pp. 221-266, 1990.
 
9
Suchman, L.A. Plans and Situated Actions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1987
 
10
Wharton, C. Implications of the Differences Between Cognitive Architectures for Human-Computer Interaction. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Colorado. In preparation.

CITED BY  19

Collaborative Colleagues:
Virginia A. Peck: colleagues
Bonnie E. John: colleagues