ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Evaluating video as a technology for informal communication
Full text PdfPdf (1.31 MB)
Source Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems archive
Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems table of contents
Monterey, California, United States
Pages: 37 - 48  
Year of Publication: 1992
ISBN:0-89791-513-5
Authors
Sponsor
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 41,   Downloads (12 Months): 201,   Citation Count: 59
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/142750.142755
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Collaborations in organizations thrive on communication that is informal because informal communication is frequent, interactive, and expressive. Informal communication is crucial for the coordination of work, learning an organization's culture, the perpetuation of the social relations that underlie collaboration, and, in general, any situation that requires communication to resolve ambiguity. Informal communication is traditionally mediated by physical proximity, but physical proximity cannot mediate in geographically distributed organizations. The research described here evaluates the adequacy of a version of a desktop video/audio conferencing system for supporting informal communication in a research and development laboratory. The evaluation took place during a trial in which the system was used by summer employees and their supervisor-mentors. While the system was used frequently, the most common uses and users' assessments suggest that it was used more like a telephone or electronic mail than like physically mediated face-to-face communication. However, some features of its use transcended traditional media and allowed users to gain awareness of their work environment. The paper concludes with a discussion of requirements for successful technology to support informal communication.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
Altman, S., Valenzi, E. & Hodgetts, R. (1985) Organizational behavior: Theory and practice. Orlando, Florida: Academic Press.
3
 
4
Bulick, S., Abel, M., Corey, D., Schmidt, J. & Coffin, S. (1989) The U.S.West Advanced Technologies prototype multi-media communications system. Globecom'89: Proceedings of the IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference. Dallas, Texas.
 
5
Cruz, G.C., Gomez, L.M., & Wilner, W.T. (1991) Tools to support conversational multimedia. In Globecom '91, Proceedings of the IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference, Phoenix, Arizona.
 
6
Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1984). Information richness: A new approach to managerial behavior and organization design. In B. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol, 6). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
 
7
 
8
Fish, R. S. (1989) CRUISER: A multimedia system for social browsing. Siggraph Video Review, Vol 45, No. 6 New York: Association for Computing Machinery
9
 
10
11
 
12
Johnson, S.C. Hierarchical clustering schemes. Psychometrika, 32, 241-254.
 
13
Kendon, A. & Ferber, A. (1973). A description of some human greetings. In R. Michael & J. Crook (Eds.), Comparative ecology and behavior of primates. London: Academic Press.
 
14
Kiesler, S., Siegel, J. & McGuire, T. (1984). Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication. American Psychologist, 39, 1123- 1134.
 
15
Knapp, Mark L.(1978). Social intercourse: From greeting to goodbye. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
 
16
Kraut, R.E., Fish, R.S., Root, R.W., & Chalfonte, B.L. (1990). Informal communication in organizations: Form, function, and technology. In S. Oskamp & S. Spacapan (Eds)., Human Reactions to Technology: The Claremont Symposium on Applied Social Psychology. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications. Pp 145-199.
 
17
Kruskal, J. (1964) Multidimensional scaling by optimizing goodness of fit to a nonmetric hypothesis. Psychometrika, 29, 1-27.
 
18
Kruskal, J., Young, F. & Seery, J. (1977) How to use KYST- 2A, a very flexible program to do multidimensional scaling and unfolding. Unpublished paper, Bell Laboratories
 
19
Louie, G., Mantei, M., & Buxton, W.A.S. (1991) Making contact in a multi-media environment. HCI Consortium on CSCW, Ann Arbor, MI., February, 1991.
 
20
Mayer, M. (1977). The telephone and the uses of time. In I. de Sola Pool (Ed.) The social impact of the telephone. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press. Pp 225-245.
 
21
Monge, P. R., Rothman, L. W., Eisenberg, E. M., Miller, K. L. & Kirste, K. K. (1985). The dynamics of organizational proximity. Management Science 31, 1129-1141.
 
22
 
23
Perry, C. R. (1977) The British experience 1876- 1912: The impact of the telephone during the years of delay. In i. de Sola Pool (Ed.) The social impact of the telephone. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
 
24
Rockoff, Maxine (1975a). An overview of some technological/heath-care system implications of seven exploratory broad-band communication experiments. IEEE Transactions on Communications, COM-23, 20-30.
 
25
Rockoff, Maxine (1975b). The social implications of health care communication systems. IEEE Transactions on Communications, COM-23 (10), 1085-1088.
26
 
27
Shepard, R. N. (1962) The analysis of proximities: Multidimensional scaling with an unknown distance function. Psychometrika, 27,127-140, 219-246.
 
28
Short, J., Williams, E., & Christie, B. (1976) The social psychology of telecommunications. London: John Wiley & Sons.
 
29
Stohl, C. & Redding, W. C. (1987). Messages and message exchange processes. In J. Jablin, L. Putnam, K. Roberts, & L. Porter (Eds.), Handbook of Organizational Communication. Newbury Park, CA" Sage Publications. Pp. 451-502.

CITED BY  59

Collaborative Colleagues:
Robert S. Fish: colleagues
Robert E. Kraut: colleagues
Robert W. Root: colleagues
Ronald E. Rice: colleagues