ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
combinFormation: Mixed-initiative composition of image and text surrogates promotes information discovery
Full text PdfPdf (4.13 MB)
Source
ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS) archive
Volume 27 ,  Issue 1  (December 2008) table of contents
Article No. 5  
Year of Publication: 2008
ISSN:1046-8188
Authors
Andruid Kerne  Texas A&M University, College Station, TX
Eunyee Koh  Texas A&M University and Adobe Systems Inc., San Jose, CA
Steven M. Smith  Texas A&M University, College Station, TX
Andrew Webb  Texas A&M University, College Station, TX
Blake Dworaczyk  Texas A&M University, College Station, TX
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 18,   Downloads (12 Months): 236,   Citation Count: 2
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1416950.1416955
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

combinFormation is a mixed-initiative creativity support tool for searching, browsing, organizing, and integrating information. Images and text are connected to represent surrogates (enhanced bookmarks), optimizing the use of human cognitive facilities. Composition, an alternative to lists and spatial hypertext, is used to represent a collection of surrogates as a connected whole, using principles from art and design. This facilitates the creative process of information discovery, in which humans develop new ideas while finding and collecting information. To provoke the user to think about the large space of potentially relevant information resources, a generative agent proactively engages in collecting information resources, forming image and text surrogates, and composing them visually. The agent develops the collection and its visual representation over time, enabling the user to see ideas and relationships. To keep the human in control, we develop interactive mechanisms for authoring the composition and directing the agent. In a field study in an interdisciplinary course on The Design Process, over a hundred students alternated using combinFormation and Google+Word to collect prior work on information discovery invention assignments. The students that used combinFormation's mixed-initiative composition of image and text surrogates performed better.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
Baddeley, A. D. 1992. Is working memory working?, Quart. J. Exp. Psych. 44A, 1--31.
 
3
4
 
5
Belkin, N. 1982. ASK for Information Retrieval: Part I. Background and Theory. J. Documentat. 38, 2, 299--304.
6
 
7
 
8
Burke, M. 1999. Organization of Multimedia Resources: Principles and Practice of Information Retrieval. Gower Publishing Company, Hampshire, U.K.
9
10
 
11
12
13
 
14
Eisenstein, S. M. 1975. The Film Sense. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, New York, NY.
 
15
Finke, R., Ward, T., and Smith, S. M. 1992. Creative Cognition. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
16
17
 
18
Glenberg, A. M. 2002. The Indexical hypothesis: Meaning from language, world, and image. In Working with Words and Images. Ablex, Westport, CT.
 
19
Glenberg, A. M. and Langston, W. E. 1992. Comprehension of illustrated text: Pictures help to build mental models. J. Mem. Lang. 31, 2, 129--151.
 
20
Hearst, M. A. and Pederson, J. O. 1996. In Proceedings of ACM IR. 76--84.
21
 
22
Horvitz, E. Uncertainty, action, and interaction. In pursuit of mixed-initiative computing. In Intelligent Systems. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, CA.
 
23
Huynh, D., Mazzocchi, S., and Karger, D. 2005. Piggy Bank: Experience the semantic Web inside your Web browser. In Proceedings of the 2005 International Semantic Web Conference. 413--430.
 
24
Interface Ecology Lab. 2007. combinFormation. http://ecologylab.cs.tamu.edu/combin Formation/.
 
25
Jones, W., Dumais, S., and Bruce, H. 2002. Once found, what then?: A study of ‘keeping’ behaviors in personal use of Web information. In Proceedings of the ASIST Annual Meeting. Vol. 39. 391--402.
26
27
 
28
29
30
31
 
32
Kerne, A., Mistrot, J. M., Khandelwal, M., Sundaram, V., and Koh, E. 2004a. Using composition to re-present personal collections of hypersigns. In Proceedings of Computational Semiotics in Games and New Media (CoSIGN).
33
 
34
Kerne, A., Smith, S. M., Mistrot, J. M., Sundaram, V., and Khandelwal, M. 2004b. Mapping interest and design to facilitate creative process during mixed-initiative information composition. In Proceedings of Interaction: Systems, Practice and Theory, Creativity & Cognition Symposium. 1--25.
 
35
Kerne, A. and Sundaram, V. 2003. A recombinant information space. In Proceedings of the Computational Semiotics in Games and New Media (CoSIGN). 48--57.
 
36
Kerne, A., Toups, Z., Dworaczyk, B., and Khandelwal, M. 2008. Componentized XML-Java data binding framework connects software engineering with efficiency. Submitted to OOPSLA.
37
 
38
Koh, E. and Kerne, A. 2006. I keep collecting: College students build and utilize collections in spite of breakdowns. In Proceedings of European Conf on Digital Libraries (ECDL). 303--314.
 
39
Lippard, L., Ed. 1971. Dadas on Art. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
 
40
Maier, N. R. F. 1931. Reasoning in humans ü: The solution of a problem and its appearance in consciousness. J. Compar. Physiol. Psych. 12, 181--194.
 
41
42
43
44
 
45
Mayer, R. E. and Moreno, R. 2002. Aids to computer-based multimedia learning. Learn. Instruct. 12, 107--119.
 
46
McNee, S. M., Lam, S., Konstan, J. A., and Riedl, J. 2003. Interfaces for eliciting new user preferences in recommender systems. In Proceedings of User Modeling. 178--188.
 
47
Miller, G. A. 2006. WordNet. Princeton University Cognitive Science Laboratory, Princeton, NJ. http://wordnet.princeton.edu/.
48
49
 
50
Oxford English Dictionary. 1992. 2nd ed., on compact disk. Oxford University Press, Oxford, U.K.
 
51
Pirolli, P. and Card, S. K. 1999. Information foraging. Psychol. Rev. 106, 4, 643--675.
 
52
Porter, M. F. 1980. An algorithm for suffix stripping. Program, 14, 3, 130--137.
 
53
Rocchio, J. 1971. Relevance feedback in information retrieval. In The Smart Retrieval System-Experiments in Automatic Document Processing. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 313--323.
 
54
55
56
57
 
58
Simon, H. A. 1971. Designing organizations for an information-rich world. In Computer, Communications, and the Public Interest. Johns Hopkins Press, Baltimore, MD, 37--72.
 
59
Smith, S. M. 1994. Getting into and out of mental ruts: A theory of fixation, incubation, and insight. In R. J. Sternberg and J. Davidson, Eds. The Nature of Insight, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 121--149.
 
60
Shah, J. J., Smith, S. M., Vargas-Hernandez, N., Gerkens, R., and Wulan, M. 2003. Empirical studies of design ideation: Alignment of design experiments with laboratory experiments. In Proceedings of DETC 2003: ASME International Conference on Design Theory and Methodology.
 
61
Spies, W., Ed. 2006. Max Ernst: Life and Work: An Autobiographical Collage. Thames & Hudson, London, U.K.
 
62
Spooky, Dj That Subliminal Kid. 2004. Rhythm Science. Mediawork /MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
 
63
Sun Microsystems. 2006. Java. http://java.sun.com.
 
64
65
 
66
67
 
68
 
69
W3C. 2000. Document Object Model (DOM) Level 2 Core Specification. http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/REC-DOM-Level-2-Core-20001113/.
70


Collaborative Colleagues:
Andruid Kerne: colleagues
Eunyee Koh: colleagues
Steven M. Smith: colleagues
Andrew Webb: colleagues
Blake Dworaczyk: colleagues