A collaborative and experiential learning model powered by real-world projects

ABSTRACT

Information Technology (IT) curricula's strong application component and its focus on user centeredness and team work require that students experience directly real-world projects for real users of IT solutions. Although the merit of this IT educational tenet is universally recognized, delivering collaborative and experiential learning has its challenges.

Reaching out to identify projects formulated by actual organizations adds significantly to course preparation. There is a certain level of risk involved with delivering a useful solution while, at the same time, enough room should be allowed for students to experiment with, be wrong about, review, and learn. Challenges pertaining to the real-world aspect of problem-based learning are compounded by managing student teams and assessing their work such that both individual and collective contributions are taken into account. Finally, the quality of the project releases is not the only measure of student learning. Students should be given meaningful opportunities to practice, improve, and demonstrate their communication and interpersonal skills.

In this paper we present our experience with two courses in which teams of students worked on real-world projects involving three external partners. We describe how each of the challenges listed above has impacted the course requirements, class instruction, team dynamics, assessment, and learning in these courses. Course assessment and survey data from students are linked to learning outcomes and point to areas where the collaborative and experiential learning model needs improvement.

REFERENCES

• 1: Anthony, W. S. 1973. Learning to discover rules by discovery. Journal of Educational Psychology, 64, 3 (June 1973), 325--328.
• 2: Williams C. Judith , Bettina Bair , Jürgen Börstler , Lethbridge C. Timothy , Ken Surendran, Client sponsored projects in software engineering courses, ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, v.35 n.1, p.401-402, January 2003
• 3: Barrows, H. S. and Tamblyn, R. M. 1980. Problem-based learning: An approach to medical education. Springer, New York.
• 4: Bruner, J. S. 1961. The art of discovery. Harvard Educational Review, 31, 1, 21--32.
• 5: Nicole Clark, Evaluating student teams developing unique industry projects, Proceedings of the 7th Australasian conference on Computing education, p.21-30, January 01, 2005, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
• 6: Nicole Clark , Pamela Davies , Rebecca Skeers, Self and peer assessment in software engineering projects, Proceedings of the 7th Australasian conference on Computing education, p.91-100, January 01, 2005, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
• 7: James B. Fenwick, Jr. , Barry L. Kurtz, Intra-curriculum software engineering education, ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, v.37 n.1, 2005
• 8: Sandra Gorka , Jacob R. Miller , Brandon J. Howe, Developing realistic capstone projects in conjunction with industry, Proceedings of the 8th ACM SIGITE conference on Information technology education, October 18-20, 2007, Destin, Florida, USA [doi>10.1145/1324302.1324309]
• 9: Paul S. Grisham , Herb Krasner , Dewayne E. Perry, Data Engineering education with real-world projects, ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, v.38 n.2, June 2006 [doi>10.1145/1138403.1138435]
• 10: Joint Task Force on IT Computing Curricula. 2008. Computing Curricula Information Technology Volume. Retrieved June 26, 2008 from http://campus.acm.org/public/comments/it-curriculum-draft-may-2008.pdf
• 11: Jonassen, D. 1991. Objectivism versus constructivism. Educational Technology Research and Development, 39, 3, 5--14.
• 12: Kolb, D. A. 1984. Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
• 13: Kirschner, P. K., Sweller, J., and Clark, R. E. 2006. Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work: An Analysis of the Failure of Constructivist, Discovery, Problem-Based, Experiential, and Inquiry-Based Teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41, 2, 75--86.
• 14: Noel LeJeune, Assessment of individuals on CS group projects, Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges, v.22 n.1, p.231-237, October 2006
• 15: Paul M. Leidig , Roger Ferguson , Jonathan Leidig, The use of community-based non-profit organizations in information systems capstone projects, ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, v.38 n.3, September 2006
• 16: Mayer, R. 2004. Should there be a three-strikes rule against pure discovery learning? The case for guided-methods of instruction. American Psychologist, 59, 1, 14--19.
• 17: Seymour Papert, Mindstorms: children, computers, and powerful ideas, Basic Books, Inc., New York, NY, 1980
• 18: Schmidt, H.G. 1983. Problem-based learning: Rationale and description. Medical Education, 17, 1, 11--16.
• 19: D. Smarkusky , R. Dempsey , J. Ludka , F. de Quillettes, Enhancing team knowledge: instruction vs. experience, ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, v.37 n.1, 2005
• 20: Harold H. Smith, III , Debra L. Smarkusky, Competency matrices for peer assessment of individuals in team projects, Proceedings of the 6th conference on Information technology education, October 20-22, 2005, Newark, NJ, USA [doi>10.1145/1095714.1095751]
• 21: Steffe, L. and Gale, J. 1995. Toward a theory of cognitive aptitude for learning from instruction. Journal of Educational Psychologist, 76, 347--376.
• 22: Sweller, J. 2003. Evolution of human cognitive architecture. In The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, B. Ross, Ed. Academic, San Diego, CA, 43, 215--266.
• 23: Joo Tan , John Phillips, Real-world project management in the academic environment, Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges, v.20 n.5, p.200-213, May 2005
• 24: Walvoord, B. E. and Anderson. 1998. V. J. Effective Grading: A tool for learning and assessment, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA.

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  K. Computing Milieux
  K.3 COMPUTERS AND EDUCATION
      K.3.1 Computer Uses in Education
          Subjects: Collaborative learning

Additional Classification:
  K. Computing Milieux
  K.3 COMPUTERS AND EDUCATION
      K.3.2 Computer and Information Science Education
          Subjects: Information systems education; Curriculum; Computer science education; Self-assessment

General Terms:
Design, Experimentation, Human Factors, Management, Measurement, Performance

Keywords:
guided instruction, interactive teaching, real-world team projects, self assessment and assessment of teamwork